by Ed Berry Anthropic’s Claude checked my carbon flow calculations I asked Claude to check my Excel worksheet, which contains all the calculations in my published papers. Here’s what Claude produced in about 20 seconds: I’ll run the audit-xls skill to check this workbook for errors.Read instructionsThe user said “audit this [sheet or workbook]” — […]
Murry Salby – at Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany, 10 October 2018 At 24 minutes, Salby notes the C13 level does not track with the CO2 level and is out of phase with the smaller CO2 fluctuations that are dependent of surface temperature.
Maybe the shortest proof that human CO2 does not change the climate. As part of my reply to Glenn Tamblyn’s comment below, here are Sections 3.3 and 6.1 in Berry (2019). 3.3 Physics Model derivation A system describes a subset of nature. A system includes levels and flows between levels. Levels set flows and flows
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Here are seven proofs that human CO2 does not control the CO2 level. My published papers describe these proofs, but this summary may help people understand these proofs. Tell me what you think of these seven proofs in your comments. You may download a PDF of this post here.
Science of Climate Change is making its publications available at no cost. Here is a full copy that you may read and download. These posts are relevant to this post: The CO2 Coalition Is Wrong Because Its Physics Is Wrong (edberry.com) The Impact Of Human Co2 On Atmospheric Co2 – Summary (edberry.com)
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Click here to read Ed Berry’s 2023 paper and debate. Copyright (c) 2022 by Edwin X Berry. Permission granted to republish with link to Berry (2021). Download pdf. Introduction Climate change: myth or reality. This summary of Berry (2021) shows the main points without the math. 1. How CO2
by Edwin X Berry On December 14, 2021, Science of Climate Change published my scientific paper: The impact of human CO2 on atmospheric CO2 – SCC (klimarealistene.com) The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assumes natural CO2 stayed constant at 280 ppm after 1750 and human CO2 dominated the CO2 increase. This paper proves this IPCC
My publication The Impact of human CO2 on atmospheric CO2 – edberry.com supersedes my Preprint #3 below. Download Excel file here. Comments by scientists: Dr. Richard Courtney wrote in his email to global-warming-realists@googlegroups.com on November 21, 2019: Dear Ed, I again provided my 2008 paper as an attachment to an email earlier today. Its conclusion
by Tom V. Segalstad (1998) A number of lifetimes and timescales are being used in both scientific and policy context to describe the behavior of heat-absorbing gases in the atmosphere. These concepts are very important for the discussion on whether anthropogenic CO2 will be accumulated in the atmosphere and exert an additional global “Greenhouse Effect”
by Dr. Ed Berry Abstract The above-ground atomic bomb tests in the 1950s and 1960s almost doubled the level of 14C, in the form of CO2, in the atmosphere. The D14C data show how the 14CO2 returned to its natural level after the termination of the bomb tests in 1963. A simple physics model accurately
by Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics Climate Truth New calculations prove all human CO2 emitted since 1750 has added only 31 ppm (parts per million) of CO2 to the atmosphere, and natural CO2 has added 100 ppm. All human carbon has added only one percent to the carbon in Earth’s carbon cycle. Nature has added much
Note: The International Journal of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences published its online version of this paper on July 4, 2019, here. Edwin X Berry, Climate Physics LLC, Bigfork, Montana, USA Abstract The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) agrees human CO2 is only 5 percent and natural CO2 is 95 percent of the
Human CO2 has little effect on atmospheric CO2 Please see the published version of this paper here. Edwin X Berry, Ph.D., CCMClimate Physics LLC, Bigfork, Montana, USA “The formulation of a problem is often more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skill. To raise new questions, new
by Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics These 8 words are the death of climate change: It violates the Equivalence Principle, therefore it’s wrong. At its very core, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) violated a key principle of physics. Therefore, all IPCC climate claims and models are wrong. IPCC’s Big Idea (its fundamental
by Dr. Ed Berry Al Gore framed the climate debate. He said, human carbon dioxide emissions increase atmospheric carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gases trap heat like a blanket that keeps you warm at night. It was that simple, he told us. People believe Big Al’s story. Simplicity sells. But simple
by Edwin Berry, PhD, Atmospheric Physics, also published in NewsWithViews Over 4000 people, including hundreds of scientists, read my article “Why our CO2 emissions do not increase Atmosphere CO2“. As I write this, there are 126 comments. One well-respected scientist wrote to me: Your article is (in my opinion) the BEST commentary yet that I’ve seen on this topic.
Note: Keith Pickering – an associate of Peter Glick of the National Academy of Sciences – makes the same argument as the UN IPCC. My rebuttal below is not as good as my later rebuttals but this July 2016 rebuttal was the beginning of my quest to find a better rebuttal… which my 2021 paper
