|

Claude approves my carbon cycle calculations

3 Comments

  1. Dr. Ed,

    I often invoke your carbon cycle model when debating the climate crazies. They’ll push a model using Excel that shows humans are the cause of all the CO2 increase since 1780. I’ll answer that this model isn’t correct because it doesn’t even use natural emissions as a source. How can you have a carbon cycle model that doesn’t include all the sources? Then I mention that your model is on Excel and it does include all the sources. Dr. Berry, both your carbon cycle model and the lapse rate falsify GHT.

  2. P.S.-Their human carbon model would work if they used the correct eTimes but they use different eTimes for human carbon and natural carbon.

  3. Dr Ed,

    Hello!

    I did the same thing to your work about a year ago and got the same conclusions using AI. I’m glad to see you finally pumped it through an AI system and let it take a objective crack at it.

    Furthermore, as this technology (AI) becomes more familiar to people I think we’re going to find out there’s a lot of other things besides just the “climate alarmism” phenomena that are going to turn out to be something other than they’ve been presented as by the institutions at large…

    TTFN
    Bonum

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *