Climate Freedom Map
Join Dr. Edwin X Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM, to help promote the climate truth
that human emissions do not change the climate.
Here’s why climate truth is important to our lives, our economy, and our freedom.
The climate scam is based on three invalid assumptions
Assumption 01
Human CO2 causes all of the CO2 increase above 280 ppm.
They say human CO2 is 33% of total CO2 in the air, but IPCC’s own data show human CO2 is less than 8%.
They say human CO2 flows out of the air much slower than natural CO2 but that is impossible because their molecules are identical.
Carbon-14 data show human CO2 is less than 2% of atmospheric CO2.
Assumption 02
The CO2 increase causes higher global temperature.
Data show temperature changes occur about 12 months before CO2 changes.
IPCC’s temperature calculation exceeds the Stephan-Boltzman temperature calculation.
IPCC neglects that cloud cover (albedo) increases as the ocean surface warms, which in turn controls the temperature.
Only 1% increase in cloud cover reduces global temperature more than doubling CO2 increases temperature.
Assumption 03
A higher global temperature causes bad stuff to happen.
The Berkeley study and other studies show no correlation of global temperature or CO2 level with the claimed bad stuff.
IPCC argues insanely that because 03 is true therefore 01 and 02 are true.
But this argument is invalid because effects do not prove their cause.
Alarmists argue that their “consensus” proves they are right. But Aristotle proved 2400 years ago that consensus is irrelevant in science.
The climate scam costs America over $4 Trillion per year
Climate truth could eliminate income tax and the annual deficit of $3 Trillion per year.
04
Direct costs
USA agencies waste money, time, and talent to decarbonize the free world, to capture carbon which is plant food, to promote irrational green energy and net zero, and to indoctrinate its people to believe the climate myth.
05
Indirect costs
USA regulations force businesses to support green energy and its taxes.
Deficits increase inflation and distort the economy. USA stopped giving research grants and contracts for true climate physics research in 1992.
06
Social costs
USA indoctrinates students to believe the climate myth. This lowers their IQs and their ability to contribute to our economy and national defense. The climate myth indoctrination was the basis for the COVID myth.
The climate scam reverses the scientific method
What they think is proof is really proof that their claim is false.
07
The IPCC claims…
“Extensive scientific evidence” proves 01, 02, and 03 are true.
However, that claim contradicts the scientific method, which says it is impossible to prove an assumption is true.
The burden of proof is on the IPCC and the IPCC has failed to prove its case.
08
Scientific Method
The scientific method says it is impossible to prove an assumption is true, but only one false prediction proves an assumption is false.
Einstein said, “Many experiments may prove me right, but it takes only one to prove me wrong.”
PS: To better the human brain, AI must find the assumptions in invalid claims, and prove the assumptions are false.
09
Science History
Aristotle described the scientific method 2400 years ago.
Our schools and universities used to teach the scientific method.
This stopped in 1992 after President GHW Bush signed the UN IPCC Earth Charter and terminated research contracts for climate physicists.
How can America stop the climate scam?
Understand the simple arguments above and use them to defeat the climate scam.
10
Many Republican leaders believe the climate scam.
They censor and silence Dr. Ed and thereby endanger everyone’s lives, economy, and freedom.
11
Montana Republican leaders are traitors who help WEF.
They purposely lost Held v Montana and prevented Dr. Berry from defeating Held v Montana.
12
Help Dr. Ed fight WEF.
Dr. Ed, like President Trump, rejects the climate scam. But he needs your help so he can tell the world the truth about climate.
Dr. Berry,
I wish you’d start a yearly Climate Truth summit in Montana and have guest speakers and technical sessions. I’d come to that.
I challenged Grok on the cause of CO2 atmospheric increase bringing Berry’s study and Berry vs Andrews debate…here it is : https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1926280716045758739
Thank you Dr Berry, on behalf of my grandchildren.
May God continue to bless you 🙏
Max,
Even though I didn’t have a twitter/x account, I couldn’t resist creating one to see what Grok would say. To my question “What is the cause of the atmospheric CO2 rise over the last century”, Grok concluded
“Conclusion
The dominant cause of the CO2 increase is human activity, particularly fossil fuel burning, as evidenced by d14C dilution, emission records, and carbon budgets. Berry’s argument for natural dominance, while engaging with d14C data, is an outlier, as it conflicts with observed sink behavior and isotopic evidence. Natural sources like ocean outgassing play a role in the carbon cycle but are not the primary driver of the century-long rise.”
This is an amusing exercise, but not particularly useful. I know that skeptics mistrust authority, and presumably that includes, or should include, AI. Therefore I never appeal to authority in my arguments, just to common sense. What does your common sense tell you about the cause of CO2 rise, given that human emissions are about 2x the rate of CO2 rise. Doesn’t that tell you that natural processes are on balance removing some of carbon from the atmosphere that we put there, not adding it? Doesn’t the CO2 added to the oceans explain the lowering of their ph, the observed “ocean acidification”? Doesn’t the observed increase in biomass tell you that land reservoirs must be gaining carbon from somewhere, not supplying it to the atmosphere?
Ed,
I made the H(1) argument to Koonen when he published “Unsettled”. Never received a reply. Perhaps the authors will reply this time.