IPCC’s Climate Change Assumption is False
By Ed Berry to be added
Below is a copy of Unbekoming’s article open for your comments. Click this link to read Unbekoming’s original post and its comments: https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/dr-edwin-berry-nature-controls-climate
By Edwin X Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM They tell us to “Follow the Science.” What science? This advice itself contradicts the scientific method. Like when Jane brought a puppy to her Kindergarten class, and Nancy asked, “Is it a girl puppy or a boy puppy?” And Johnny replied, “Let’s vote on it!” All
by Dr. Ed Berry In what may be the most significant takeover of conservative climate leadership in America, the CO2 Coalition and the Heartland Institute chose a former Greenpeace professional to help lead them. The CO2 Coalition and the Heartland Institute stupidly gave control of their organizations to Patrick Moore, a far-left Trojan Horse, who
by Ed Berry, PhD On September 7, 2018, I introduced the Climate Equivalence Principle (CEP) at the climate conference in Porto, Portugal. Above is my Slide #10. CEP says that because we cannot distinguish between human and natural-derived carbon atoms or CO2 molecules, they are identical and flow through the carbon cycle at the same rates. CEP
Held v Montana Montana is where Our Children’s Trust won its Held v Montana climate lawsuit in June 2023 and thereby set a precedent for winning LvT. Montana is where Our Children’s Trust filed its Lighthiser v Trump climate lawsuit and chose its preferred federal judge. Montana is where the World Economic Forum (WEF) is
Murry Salby – at Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany, 10 October 2018 At 24 minutes, Salby notes the C13 level does not track with the CO2 level and is out of phase with the smaller CO2 fluctuations that are dependent of surface temperature.
Ned Nikolov and Karl Zeller Main Conclusions Our analysis revealed that the solar forcing (i.e., Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) and albedo changes) measured by CERES explain 100% of the observed global warming trend and 83% of the interannual GSAT variability over the past 24 years (Figure 9), including the extreme 2023 heat anomaly (Figure 10).
Maybe the shortest proof that human CO2 does not change the climate. As part of my reply to Glenn Tamblyn’s comment below, here are Sections 3.3 and 6.1 in Berry (2019). 3.3 Physics Model derivation A system describes a subset of nature. A system includes levels and flows between levels. Levels set flows and flows
If they read it, this Amicus Brief will overturn Held v Montana February 13, 2024 Amicus Parties Alphabetized Legislators Voting Break Down for HB 971: https://apps.montanafreepress.org/capitol-tracker-2023/bills/hb-971/ Voting Break Down for SB 557: https://apps.montanafreepress.org/capitol-tracker-2023/bills/sb-557/ Alphabetized Non-Government parties Noted for choosing to NOT be Parties to this Amicus Brief:
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Koutsoyiannis et al. (2023) prove that increase in global temperature causes the increase in atmospheric CO2, and not vice-versa. That is a significant proof. Koutsoyiannis et al. also proves Theory (1) is false. IPCC Theory (1) says the natural CO2 level remained constant at 280 ppm and human CO2
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Here are seven proofs that human CO2 does not control the CO2 level. My published papers describe these proofs, but this summary may help people understand these proofs. Tell me what you think of these seven proofs in your comments. You may download a PDF of this post here.
On March 21, 2018, the US District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division granted William Happer, Steven Koonin, and Richard Lindzen “leave to submit presentation in response to the court’s tutorial questions.” Somehow, through the magic of law, they were able to file their 26-page document on March 19, 2018. We reproduce the
A critical debate in climate-change physics IPCC Assumption (1) states that human carbon emissions cause all the increase in CO2 since 1750. CO2 Coalition says Assumption (1) is true. Berry says Assumption (1) is false. See all SCC papers here: Science of climate change Berry (2023) https://doi.org/10.53234/scc202301/21 Press down arrow to download PDF Andrews (2023)
Science of Climate Change is making its publications available at no cost. Here is a full copy that you may read and download. These posts are relevant to this post: The CO2 Coalition Is Wrong Because Its Physics Is Wrong (edberry.com) The Impact Of Human Co2 On Atmospheric Co2 – Summary (edberry.com)
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Click here to read Ed Berry’s 2023 paper and debate. Copyright (c) 2022 by Edwin X Berry. Permission granted to republish with link to Berry (2021). Download pdf. Introduction Climate change: myth or reality. This summary of Berry (2021) shows the main points without the math. 1. How CO2
NASA’s “The Causes of Climate Change” parrots the UN IPCC: In its Fifth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of 1,300 independent scientific experts from countries all over the world under the auspices of the United Nations, concluded there’s a more than 95 percent probability that human activities over the past
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics On January 22, 2021, Elon Musk tweeted about climate change, “Am awarding $100 M towards a prize for best carbon capture technology.” Elon assumes, as most people do, that the following United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) theories are true: Human carbon dioxide emissions have caused all the
By Ed Berry, PhD, Physics In March 2022, the Los Angeles Times published an editorial that was 100% misinformation about what it called climate “misinformation.” Climate change alarmism is not based on science. It is based on money, politics, brainwashing, groupthink, and conditioned reflex as Pavlov did with his dogs. Far too many people, including