Below is a copy of Unbekoming’s article open for your comments. Click this link to read Unbekoming’s original post and its comments: https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/dr-edwin-berry-nature-controls-climate
by Howard C. Hayden, Prof. Emeritus of Physics, UConn Letters@aps.org Traditionally, climatology has made good use of chemistry, economics (records of food production), art (paintings of people skating on the Thames), history, astronomy, biology (leaf stomata, leaves, seeds), paleontology, archaeology, literature, limnology, oceanography, cave drawings, depictions of a veldt-like Sahara in Egyptian tombstones, and practically
Ferenc Miskolczi Foreign Associate Member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Budapest, Hungary https://doi.org/10.53234/SCC202304/05 www.scienceofclimatechange.org History Ferenc Miskolczi first published his research on this subject in 1989. His following publications (2004, 2007, 2010, 2011, 2014, 2021) led to his 2023 landmark publication shown here. Ferenc Miskolczi is the first scientist to show how water vapor
By his friends and colleagues MURRY SALBY PASSED AWAY EARLIER THIS YEAR Dear Colleagues and Friends of Murry Salby, You all know the excellent scientific work of Prof. Murry Salby published in his books, hundreds of papers and conference contributions and also presented in several videos. But some of you might not be aware that Murry
David Wojick commented on Ed’s paper on Climate Depot No doubt the IPCC is wrong but there are skeptical climate scientists that do not accept Ed Berry’s argument, including me. In my case it is not the calculations, but the conclusion that is the problem. Given the huge natural CO2 flux it is indeed true
W.A. van Wijngaarden and Will Happer calculated the CO2 climate sensitivity – or the temperature increase when CO2 doubles – is 2.2 K for a fixed relative humidity. This means global warming caused by increased CO2 is insignificant. This shows CO2 does not cause climate change. See the green line in their Figure 4, also
Chuck Wiese is the best meteorologist I know. Last year, he retired from flying the big jets for Delta Airlines. – Ed by Chuck Wiese, Meteorologist With the continued and terrible politicization of atmospheric science and climate, I thought I would take a look at the true cause of this historic Pacific Northwest heat
By Ed Berry, PhD, Atmospheric Physics, CCM IPCC’s invalid theory Get over it. You are not causing global warming. Those who tell you otherwise are lying to you. Here is new, powerful evidence that the climate alarmists are wrong. They flunk science. They have caused the greatest scam in human history. The United Nations IPCC
by Camille Veyres, Porto Conference 2018 Summary: (1) The amount of carbon dioxide in the air in a consequence of the surface temperatures of the intertropical zone where most of the outgassing takes place; it is a consequence (an integral over time) of past temperatures, and hence cannot cause the temperatures; 6% of the CO2
by Dr. Ed Berry Here’s the untold story behind my first scientific publication where you may find the story more interesting than the publication itself. It’s a story about how what we may think is so, is not so. It’s a story that attracted a lot of attention because it showed a logic error in simple physics made
by Prof. Don J. Easterbrook, Global Research, November, 2008 INTRODUCTION Despite no global warming in 10 years and recording setting cold in 2007-2008, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC) and computer modelers who believe that CO2 is the cause of global warming still predict the Earth is in store for catastrophic warming in this century. IPCC
by Bryce Johnson Abstract [latexpage] The interactions of the fossil-fuel source of carbon dioxide with the atmosphere as well as in the total biosphere are analyzed. The time dependence of resulting carbon levels and temperatures in all components of the biosphere are determined under a full range of possible insertion and depletion rates to and
by Dr. Ed Berry Tom Quirk shows natural variability of the climate is the prime cause of increasing CO2, not the emissions of CO2 from the use of fossil fuels. See: Energy & Environment, 20, 1-2, Jan 2009, pp 105-121 The IPCC core hypothesis is that human CO2 causes all the increase in atmospheric CO2
