Ned Nikolov and Karl Zeller Main Conclusions Our analysis revealed that the solar forcing (i.e., Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) and albedo changes) measured by CERES explain 100% of the observed global warming trend and 83% of the interannual GSAT variability over the past 24 years (Figure 9), including the extreme 2023 heat anomaly (Figure 10). […]
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Koutsoyiannis et al. (2023) prove that increase in global temperature causes the increase in atmospheric CO2, and not vice-versa. That is a significant proof. Koutsoyiannis et al. also proves Theory (1) is false. IPCC Theory (1) says the natural CO2 level remained constant at 280 ppm and human CO2
On March 21, 2018, the US District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division granted William Happer, Steven Koonin, and Richard Lindzen “leave to submit presentation in response to the court’s tutorial questions.” Somehow, through the magic of law, they were able to file their 26-page document on March 19, 2018. We reproduce the
NASA’s “The Causes of Climate Change” parrots the UN IPCC: In its Fifth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of 1,300 independent scientific experts from countries all over the world under the auspices of the United Nations, concluded there’s a more than 95 percent probability that human activities over the past
Download Miskolczi 2015: “The Greenhouse Effect and the Infrared Radiative Structure of the Earth’s Atmosphere“
Murry Salby April 18, 2013 Presentation of Prof. Murry Salby in Hamburg, Germany, with the title: Relationship between Greenhouse Gases and Global Temperature. Salby concludes the IPCC’s claim that carbon isotope ratios to prove burning of fossil fuels caused the increase in atmospheric CO2 is false. His reasons are (a) human emissions are only 5/150 of
[embeddoc url=”http://edberry.com/SiteDocs/2013/04/EGU2011-13622_presentationS.pptx” viewer=”microsoft”]
If CO2 drives arctic temperature then the red temperature line should follow the blue CO2 line. Obviously, it does not. The red temperature line follows the green geomagnetic field line. So what’s all the fuss about our CO2 emissions? It’s long departed from science. Its power politics to take our money and our freedom. From
Ferenc Miskolczi’s Saturated Greenhouse Effect Theory by Miklos Zagoni, SPPI, December 18, 2009 The Earth’s atmosphere differs in essence from that of Venus and Mars. Our atmosphere is not totally cloud-covered, as is Venus: globally, about 40% of the sky is always clear. Also we have huge ocean surfaces that serve as a practically unlimited
by Dr Miklos Zagoni, Physicist, Budapest, Hungary, 31 Dec, 2009 In 2004, Dr. Ferenc Miskolczi published a paper “The greenhouse effect and the spectral decomposition of the clear-sky terrestrial radiation“, in the Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service (Vol. 108, No. 4, October–December 2004, pp. 209–251.). The co-author of the article was his boss at NASA (Martin Mlynczak).
by Richard J. Petschauer (January 18, 2011) 1. Background Climate science is certainly not settled considering how poorly the models handle latent heat transfer. This is a process involving heat loss on the surface from evaporation that is moved to a corresponding heat gain when condensation occurs during cloud formation, causing added heat to be
by Tom V. Segalstad, CO2Science In a paper recently published in the international peer-reviewed journal Energy & Fuels, Dr. Robert H. Essenhigh (2009), Professor of Energy Conversion at The Ohio State University, addresses the residence time (RT) of anthropogenic CO2 in the air. He finds that the RT for bulk atmospheric CO2, the molecule 12CO2,
by Dr. Ed Berry Tom Quirk shows natural variability of the climate is the prime cause of increasing CO2, not the emissions of CO2 from the use of fossil fuels. See: Energy & Environment, 20, 1-2, Jan 2009, pp 105-121 The IPCC core hypothesis is that human CO2 causes all the increase in atmospheric CO2
