Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM On August 14, 2023, Montana Republicans lost the Held v Montana (HvM) climate lawsuit, as I said they would since June 2022, based upon how AG Knudsen was failing to prepare to defend HvM. The judge did not make a biased decision, as AG Knudsen now clams. The judge […]
Ferenc Miskolczi Foreign Associate Member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Budapest, Hungary https://doi.org/10.53234/SCC202304/05 www.scienceofclimatechange.org History Ferenc Miskolczi first published his research on this subject in 1989. His following publications (2004, 2007, 2010, 2011, 2014, 2021) led to his 2023 landmark publication shown here. Ferenc Miskolczi is the first scientist to show how water vapor
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Montana’s elected Republicans rearrange their deck chairs unaware their Titanic is about to hit an iceberg. Montana’s Republicans are about to lose the Held v Montana (HvM) climate lawsuit when its trial begins on June 12. Our Childrens’ Trust filed HvM and similar climate lawsuits in several states. They
On March 21, 2018, the US District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division granted William Happer, Steven Koonin, and Richard Lindzen “leave to submit presentation in response to the court’s tutorial questions.” Somehow, through the magic of law, they were able to file their 26-page document on March 19, 2018. We reproduce the
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM The IPCC claims these three (false) theories are true: Gregory Wrightstone, CO2 Coalition Replies by Ed Berry are in blue. Berry (2021) is a quite appealing theory, but also, I believe to be quite wrong. The rise of atmospheric CO2 levels is easily explained by increasing man-made emissions. I
A critical debate in climate-change physics IPCC Assumption (1) states that human carbon emissions cause all the increase in CO2 since 1750. CO2 Coalition says Assumption (1) is true. Berry says Assumption (1) is false. See all SCC papers here: Science of climate change Berry (2023) https://doi.org/10.53234/scc202301/21 Andrews (2023) https://doi.org/10.53234/scc202301/20 Andrews (2023a) debate https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/Andrews-2023-More-Clear-Thinking-II.pdf Berry
by Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics When Democrats win Held v Montana (HvM) here’s what will happen: At my own expense, I defeated this lawsuit in 2011 when it was a Petition in Montana’s Supreme Court. I thereby saved Montana billions of dollars and set a legal precedent that Montana courts cannot assume human CO2
Science of Climate Change is making its publications available at no cost. Here is a full copy that you may read and download. These posts are relevant to this post: The CO2 Coalition Is Wrong Because Its Physics Is Wrong (edberry.com) The Impact Of Human Co2 On Atmospheric Co2 – Summary (edberry.com)
By his friends and colleagues MURRY SALBY PASSED AWAY EARLIER THIS YEAR Dear Colleagues and Friends of Murry Salby, You all know the excellent scientific work of Prof. Murry Salby published in his books, hundreds of papers and conference contributions and also presented in several videos. But some of you might not be aware that Murry
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Click here to read Ed Berry’s 2023 paper and debate. Copyright (c) 2022 by Edwin X Berry. Permission granted to republish with link to Berry (2021). Download pdf. Introduction Climate change: myth or reality. This summary of Berry (2021) shows the main points without the math. 1. How CO2
NASA’s “The Causes of Climate Change” parrots the UN IPCC: In its Fifth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of 1,300 independent scientific experts from countries all over the world under the auspices of the United Nations, concluded there’s a more than 95 percent probability that human activities over the past
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics On January 22, 2021, Elon Musk tweeted about climate change, “Am awarding $100 M towards a prize for best carbon capture technology.” Elon assumes, as most people do, that the following United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) theories are true: Human carbon dioxide emissions have caused all the
by Howard “Cork” Hayden, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Physics, U Connecticut This is a short series about basic (all-inclusive) physics that pertains to climate change. My purpose is not to engage in detail about wind, rain, snow, storms, historical climatology,Milankovitch cycles, or any of the common topics discussed about climate. My purpose is to discuss
by Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM But for Montana’s far-right, April 22, 2022, would have been the last Earth Day that assumes human carbon dioxide causes dangerous climate change. Montana’s far-right “hate voters” are now losing a climate change lawsuit that will cost Montana a billion dollars per year thereafter. Our Children’s Trust (OCT)
By Ed Berry, PhD, Physics In March 2022, the Los Angeles Times published an editorial that was 100% misinformation about what it called climate “misinformation.” Climate change alarmism is not based on science. It is based on money, politics, brainwashing, groupthink, and conditioned reflex as Pavlov did with his dogs. Far too many people, including
Courtesy of Elon Musk, some things we should know to think logically. Fundamental Attribution Error. When someone is late, it’s because they’re lazy. But if you’re late, it was the traffic. Self-Serving Bias. Attributing your successes to your skill and your screw ups to bad luck. In-Group Favoritism. Tendency to favor those in our group over those who are
by Ed Berry, PhD The journal, Science of Climate Change, published my landmark scientific paper on December 14, 2021. My paper, and papers by Murry Salby and Hermann Harde, are checkmate proof that natural CO2, not human CO2, causes most of the increase in atmospheric CO2. Physics proves our CO2 does not change our climate.
David Wojick commented on Ed’s paper on Climate Depot No doubt the IPCC is wrong but there are skeptical climate scientists that do not accept Ed Berry’s argument, including me. In my case it is not the calculations, but the conclusion that is the problem. Given the huge natural CO2 flux it is indeed true
by Edwin X Berry On December 14, 2021, Science of Climate Change published my scientific paper: The impact of human CO2 on atmospheric CO2 – SCC (klimarealistene.com) The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assumes natural CO2 stayed constant at 280 ppm after 1750 and human CO2 dominated the CO2 increase. This paper proves this IPCC
W.A. van Wijngaarden and Will Happer calculated the CO2 climate sensitivity – or the temperature increase when CO2 doubles – is 2.2 K for a fixed relative humidity. This means global warming caused by increased CO2 is insignificant. This shows CO2 does not cause climate change. See the green line in their Figure 4, also
