by Ed Berry Anthropic’s Claude checked my carbon flow calculations I asked Claude to check my Excel worksheet, which contains all the calculations in my published papers. Here’s what Claude produced in about 20 seconds: I’ll run the audit-xls skill to check this workbook for errors.Read instructionsThe user said “audit this [sheet or workbook]” — […]
Below is a copy of Unbekoming’s article open for your comments. Click this link to read Unbekoming’s original post and its comments: https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/dr-edwin-berry-nature-controls-climate
By Edwin X Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM They tell us to “Follow the Science.” What science? This advice itself contradicts the scientific method. Like when Jane brought a puppy to her Kindergarten class, and Nancy asked, “Is it a girl puppy or a boy puppy?” And Johnny replied, “Let’s vote on it!” All
by Ed Berry, PhD On September 7, 2018, I introduced the Climate Equivalence Principle (CEP) at the climate conference in Porto, Portugal. Above is my Slide #10. CEP says that because we cannot distinguish between human and natural-derived carbon atoms or CO2 molecules, they are identical and flow through the carbon cycle at the same rates. CEP
Murry Salby – at Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany, 10 October 2018 At 24 minutes, Salby notes the C13 level does not track with the CO2 level and is out of phase with the smaller CO2 fluctuations that are dependent of surface temperature.
Ned Nikolov and Karl Zeller Main Conclusions Our analysis revealed that the solar forcing (i.e., Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) and albedo changes) measured by CERES explain 100% of the observed global warming trend and 83% of the interannual GSAT variability over the past 24 years (Figure 9), including the extreme 2023 heat anomaly (Figure 10).
Maybe the shortest proof that human CO2 does not change the climate. As part of my reply to Glenn Tamblyn’s comment below, here are Sections 3.3 and 6.1 in Berry (2019). 3.3 Physics Model derivation A system describes a subset of nature. A system includes levels and flows between levels. Levels set flows and flows
Chuck Wiese, Meteorologist I often get asked by climate hysterics that if the increase in atmospheric CO2 isn’t responsible for the global warming of the last forty years of record in the satellite data, then what could have caused it? They point at total solar irradiance and indicate any changes are far too small to
by Howard C. Hayden, Prof. Emeritus of Physics, UConn Letters@aps.org Traditionally, climatology has made good use of chemistry, economics (records of food production), art (paintings of people skating on the Thames), history, astronomy, biology (leaf stomata, leaves, seeds), paleontology, archaeology, literature, limnology, oceanography, cave drawings, depictions of a veldt-like Sahara in Egyptian tombstones, and practically
by Terry Oldberg I am attempting to correct an error in Wikipedia’s article on Earth’s climate system as it is currently written. Unfortunately, Wikipedia will not let me update its article. The error is to mistake an “abstract” event of the future for Earth’s climate system for a “concrete” event of the future for this
World’s Simplest Argument that proves human CO2 does not change the climate Meteorologists, scientists explain why there is No Climate Emergency Original by Katie Spence – The Epoch Times, Sep 14, 2023 This post uses and simplifies the part related to Ed Berry. For the whole Epoch Times article, click here. To read my papers
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Here are seven proofs that human CO2 does not control the CO2 level. My published papers describe these proofs, but this summary may help people understand these proofs. Tell me what you think of these seven proofs in your comments. You may download a PDF of this post here.
Ferenc Miskolczi Foreign Associate Member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Budapest, Hungary https://doi.org/10.53234/SCC202304/05 www.scienceofclimatechange.org New PDF Viewer History Ferenc Miskolczi first published his research on this subject in 1989. His following publications (2004, 2007, 2010, 2011, 2014, 2021) led to his 2023 landmark publication shown here. Ferenc Miskolczi is the first scientist to show
A critical debate in climate-change physics IPCC Assumption (1) states that human carbon emissions cause all the increase in CO2 since 1750. CO2 Coalition says Assumption (1) is true. Berry says Assumption (1) is false. See all SCC papers here: Science of climate change Berry (2023) https://doi.org/10.53234/scc202301/21 Andrews (2023) https://doi.org/10.53234/scc202301/20 Andrews (2023a) debate https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/Andrews-2023-More-Clear-Thinking-II.pdf Berry
Chuck Wiese, Meteorologist As in all the other five climate assessments from OCCRI, this one is no different and doubles down on collective stupidity as the authors are not the least bit inquisitive as to the validation of any of their claims or offering any proof that the legislative actions on climate taken up by
Science of Climate Change is making its publications available at no cost. Here is a full copy that you may read and download. These posts are relevant to this post: The CO2 Coalition Is Wrong Because Its Physics Is Wrong (edberry.com) The Impact Of Human Co2 On Atmospheric Co2 – Summary (edberry.com)
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Click here to read Ed Berry’s 2023 paper and debate. Copyright (c) 2022 by Edwin X Berry. Permission granted to republish with link to Berry (2021). Download pdf. Introduction Climate change: myth or reality. This summary of Berry (2021) shows the main points without the math. 1. How CO2
NASA’s “The Causes of Climate Change” parrots the UN IPCC: In its Fifth Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a group of 1,300 independent scientific experts from countries all over the world under the auspices of the United Nations, concluded there’s a more than 95 percent probability that human activities over the past
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics On January 22, 2021, Elon Musk tweeted about climate change, “Am awarding $100 M towards a prize for best carbon capture technology.” Elon assumes, as most people do, that the following United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) theories are true: Human carbon dioxide emissions have caused all the
