World’s Simplest Argument that proves
human CO2 does not change the climate
Meteorologists, scientists explain why there is No Climate Emergency
Original by Katie Spence – The Epoch Times, Sep 14, 2023
This post uses and simplifies the part related to Ed Berry. For the whole Epoch Times article, click here.
To read my papers and references, please go here: Berry Vs Andrews On Theory (1) (edberry.com)
The ‘Climate Emergency’
Edwin Berry, a theoretical physicist and certified consulting meteorologist, said IPCC’s core theory is that natural CO2 has stayed constant at 280 ppm since 1750 and that human CO2 is responsible for the 140-ppm increase.
This IPCC theory makes human CO2 responsible for 33 percent of today’s total CO2 level.
Here’s the problem with that IPCC theory.
The public perception of carbon dioxide is that it goes into the atmosphere and stays there. They think it just accumulates. But it doesn’t. At a constant level, the outflow equals the inflow.
A constant level of 140 ppm requires a continual CO2 inflow of 40 ppm per year because, according to the IPCC, CO2 has a turnover time of 3.5 years.
Divide 140 ppm by 3.5 years to get 40 ppm per year.
A level of 280 ppm requires 80 ppm of inflow. So, IPCC’s claimed human CO2 level of 140 ppm requires 40 ppm per year of inflow, which is 33% of the total CO2 inflow.
But even IPCC says human CO2 inflow is about 5% to 7% of the total CO2 inflow.
So, because human CO2 inflow of 5% to 7% of the total inflow cannot support IPCC’s claimed 140 ppm level, the IPCC instead claims human CO2 has a turnover time of hundreds to thousands of years.
The IPCC is saying something is different about human CO2 keeps it from flowing out of the atmosphere as fast as natural CO2.
IPCC scientists should have asked the simple question: ‘Is a human carbon dioxide molecule identical to a natural carbon dioxide molecule? And the answer is yes.
Since human and natural CO2 molecules are identical, their turnover times are identical, or 3.5 years. So, the whole idea that human CO2 turnover time is hundreds or thousands of years is impossible.
This means nature—not humans—caused the increase in CO2. And consequently, attempts to decrease human CO2 are pointless.
The belief that human CO2 drives the CO2 increase may be the biggest public delusion and most costly fraud in history.
In science, the scientific method says you can’t prove that a theory is 100 percent true — only that the data supports it. But you can prove it’s false. IPCC proposed a theory, and if we can prove it’s wrong, we win. I proved their theory is wrong.
I took my research a step further and calculated the human carbon cycle using IPCC’s own carbon cycle data.
The prediction from the same model doesn’t show humans producing 140 ppm. It comes out closer to 30 ppm. Which means the IPCC is wrong.
Using the IPCC’s data, nature is responsible for about 390 ppm of CO2, and humans are only responsible for about 30 ppm—not 140 ppm.
Now, someone could ask, ‘Well, is the IPCC data correct?’ My answer is, ‘I don’t know.’ But I don’t have to know because IPCC has used this very data to deceive the world. I want to show that their logic is incorrect using their data.
The IPCC was not set up as a scientific organization.
IPCC doesn’t engage in skepticism of its theories and, therefore, the scientific method that governs all science.
IPCC was set up as a political organization to specifically convince the public that carbon dioxide was causing problems.
There’s no climate emergency.
All my research and correspondence from colleagues trying to disprove my theories are available to the public.