by Joseph Campbell (1904 – 1987) Selections We are all agents in the structuring of other peoples’ lives. Eternity is now. Time is our experience. Later, we will ask: “Who composed this plot?” The adventure matches the readiness of the hero. Follow your bliss and doors will open for you where they would open for […]
by Bill Gray, Professor Emeritus, Colorado State University (AMS Fellow, Charney Award recipient, and over 50-year member) June 2011, about climate change. Originally posted: On The Hijacking of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) – Watts Up With That? [ I knew Bill Gray well even before I was a Program Manager for the National Science Foundation
The climate change delusion is a real-life rerun of this Twilight Zone story. Do you remember the Twilight Zone story where the distributor of a fortune made the recipients wear grotesque masks until the clock struck midnight? … When they took their masks off, they found their faces became the same as their masks. The
by Edwin X Berry On December 14, 2021, Science of Climate Change published my scientific paper: The impact of human CO2 on atmospheric CO2 – SCC (klimarealistene.com) The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assumes natural CO2 stayed constant at 280 ppm after 1750 and human CO2 dominated the CO2 increase. This paper proves this IPCC
W.A. van Wijngaarden and Will Happer calculated the CO2 climate sensitivity – or the temperature increase when CO2 doubles – is 2.2 K for a fixed relative humidity. This means global warming caused by increased CO2 is insignificant. This shows CO2 does not cause climate change. See the green line in their Figure 4, also
We have two excellent professional papers on climate change to review and compare. The first is by William A. van Wijngaarden and Will Happer. They calculate the CO2 climate sensitivity – the increase in temperature when CO2 doubles – is 2.2 K for a fixed relative humidity. The second is by David Coe, Walter Fabinski,
Monday, September 13, 2021by Dr. Ed Berry The world’s most costly scientific error is the false belief that human CO2 causes all the increase in atmospheric CO2. The truth is that nature causes most of the increase. The truth changes everything they have told you about climate change. My new scientific paper describes this widely promoted scientific
My publication The Impact of human CO2 on atmospheric CO2 – edberry.com supersedes my Preprint #3 below. Download Excel file here. Comments by scientists: Dr. Richard Courtney wrote in his email to global-warming-realists@googlegroups.com on November 21, 2019: Dear Ed, I again provided my 2008 paper as an attachment to an email earlier today. Its conclusion
Chuck Wiese is the best meteorologist I know. Last year, he retired from flying the big jets for Delta Airlines. – Ed by Chuck Wiese, Meteorologist With the continued and terrible politicization of atmospheric science and climate, I thought I would take a look at the true cause of this historic Pacific Northwest heat
“This establishes once and for all, at least as far as Montana law is concerned, climate science is decidedly not settled.” – Attorney Quentin Rhoades Barhaugh v. Montana: Petition for Original Jurisdiction The Petition is based on its claims (highlighted) that human carbon emissions cause bad things to happen. They quote flaming alarmists for their
by Tom V. Segalstad (1998) A number of lifetimes and timescales are being used in both scientific and policy context to describe the behavior of heat-absorbing gases in the atmosphere. These concepts are very important for the discussion on whether anthropogenic CO2 will be accumulated in the atmosphere and exert an additional global “Greenhouse Effect”
People in several USA states and in New Zealand, Australia, Norway, Sweden, Germany, and France have indicated an interest in having a Climate Resolution that will be the foundation of their group’s political actions related to climate change. Therefore, I drafted this resolution for you who wish to make a climate resolution for your group.
by Richard S. Courtney New plot to compare with Figure 1 Compare Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 with the figure below that I (Ed) plotted using IPCC-approved data with monthly resolution with the bonus that the data extend to 2015. The plot shows that Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 is correct. The annual change in the Mauna
Americans prepare for War by Patrick Byrne and associates Introduction by Dr. Ed Berry There are two kinds of people: those who defend truth and those who reject truth. Those who go along with lies so they do not “rock the boat” reject truth. Truth is the foundation of our freedom. If we reject truth,
Note: The described excellent calculations by Happer and Wijngaarden are independent from the question of how much nature or humans caused the increase in carbon dioxide. – Ed by David Wojick, Ph.D. Precision research by physicists William Happer and Willem van Wijngaarden has determined that the current levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and water vapor
How climate change panic costs us trillions, hurts the poor, and fails to fix the planet by Bjorn Lomborg (Basic Books: 2020) Reviewed by Thomas P. Sheahen Danish Economist Bjorn Lomborg is already well known for eight other books at the intersection of economics and public policy. “The Skeptical Environmentalist,” published in 2001 established him
by Frankema | 15 Oct 2020 | COVID-19, Politics Reiner Fuellmich is an experienced lawyer who is one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee. On July 10, 2020, he began taking testimonies from scientists, doctors and experts to gather information on the Corona crisis. He says at the beginning of his video: “This corona crisis must, according to
The newly acquired knowledge I have about a new book from Dr. Ed Berry is almost more than I can bear. As an octogenarian I am nearly overwhelmed with the discovery that truth is once again in season. And now the world will gain, along with me, a reinforcement of values lost, of twisted information
Climate Miracle Copyright Dedication Table of Contents Foreword Introduction Chapter 1 – A Critical Climate Debate 1.1 There are two kinds of climate scientists 1.2 Ice core data underrepresent actual CO2 1.3 Effects do not prove their cause 1.4 Human CO2 does not stick in the atmosphere 1.5 Sum of human CO2 proves nature caused
