Murry Salby – at Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany, 10 October 2018 At 24 minutes, Salby notes the C13 level does not track with the CO2 level and is out of phase with the smaller CO2 fluctuations that are dependent of surface temperature.
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics On February 3, I presented an explanation of climate change that easily proves human CO2 does not cause the increase in atmospheric CO2, and therefore does not cause climate change. I invite all who attended to comment here on my climate seminar of February 3. In addition, now we have
Maybe the shortest proof that human CO2 does not change the climate. As part of my reply to Glenn Tamblyn’s comment below, here are Sections 3.3 and 6.1 in Berry (2019). 3.3 Physics Model derivation A system describes a subset of nature. A system includes levels and flows between levels. Levels set flows and flows
If they read it, this Amicus Brief will overturn Held v Montana February 13, 2024 Amicus Parties Alphabetized Legislators Voting Break Down for HB 971: https://apps.montanafreepress.org/capitol-tracker-2023/bills/hb-971/ Voting Break Down for SB 557: https://apps.montanafreepress.org/capitol-tracker-2023/bills/sb-557/ Alphabetized Non-Government parties Noted for choosing to NOT be Parties to this Amicus Brief:
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Koutsoyiannis et al. (2023) prove that increase in global temperature causes the increase in atmospheric CO2, and not vice-versa. That is a significant proof. Koutsoyiannis et al. also proves Theory (1) is false. IPCC Theory (1) says the natural CO2 level remained constant at 280 ppm and human CO2
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Here are seven proofs that human CO2 does not control the CO2 level. My published papers describe these proofs, but this summary may help people understand these proofs. Tell me what you think of these seven proofs in your comments. You may download a PDF of this post here.
A critical debate in climate-change physics IPCC Hypothesis (1) says human carbon emissions cause all the CO2 increase since 1750. Andrews (U of Montana physics professor) says Hypothesis (1) is true. Berry says Hypothesis (1) is false. See all SCC papers here: Science of climate change Berry (2023) https://doi.org/10.53234/scc202301/21 Press down arrow to download PDF
Science of Climate Change is making its publications available at no cost. Here is a full copy that you may read and download. These posts are relevant to this post: The CO2 Coalition Is Wrong Because Its Physics Is Wrong (edberry.com) The Impact Of Human Co2 On Atmospheric Co2 – Summary (edberry.com)
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Click here to read Ed Berry’s 2023 paper and debate. Copyright (c) 2022 by Edwin X Berry. Permission granted to republish with link to Berry (2021). Download pdf. Introduction Climate change: myth or reality. This summary of Berry (2021) shows the main points without the math. 1. How CO2
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics On January 22, 2021, Elon Musk tweeted about climate change, “Am awarding $100 M towards a prize for best carbon capture technology.” Elon assumes, as most people do, that the following United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) theories are true: Human carbon dioxide emissions have caused all the
By Ed Berry, PhD, Physics In March 2022, the Los Angeles Times published an editorial that was 100% misinformation about what it called climate “misinformation.” Climate change alarmism is not based on science. It is based on money, politics, brainwashing, groupthink, and conditioned reflex as Pavlov did with his dogs. Far too many people, including
Health Physics published the paper on climate change by Kenneth Skrable, George Chabot, and Clayton French on January 8, 2022: World Atmospheric CO2, Its 14C Specific Activity, Non-fossil Component, Anthropogenic Fossil Component, and Emissions (1750–2018) Skrable et al. (2022) write (with symbols translated to language), These results negate claims that the CO2 increase since 1750 has
by Ed Berry, PhD The journal, Science of Climate Change, published my landmark scientific paper on December 14, 2021. My paper, and papers by Murry Salby and Hermann Harde, are checkmate proof that natural CO2, not human CO2, causes most of the increase in atmospheric CO2. Physics proves our CO2 does not change our climate.
by Edwin X Berry On December 14, 2021, Science of Climate Change published my scientific paper: The impact of human CO2 on atmospheric CO2 – SCC (klimarealistene.com) The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assumes natural CO2 stayed constant at 280 ppm after 1750 and human CO2 dominated the CO2 increase. This paper proves this IPCC
Monday, September 13, 2021by Dr. Ed Berry The world’s most costly scientific error is the false belief that human CO2 causes all the increase in atmospheric CO2. The truth is that nature causes most of the increase. The truth changes everything they have told you about climate change. My new scientific paper describes this widely promoted scientific
My publication The Impact of human CO2 on atmospheric CO2 – edberry.com supersedes my Preprint #3 below. Download Excel file here. Comments by scientists: Dr. Richard Courtney wrote in his email to global-warming-realists@googlegroups.com on November 21, 2019: Dear Ed, I again provided my 2008 paper as an attachment to an email earlier today. Its conclusion
by Tom V. Segalstad (1998) A number of lifetimes and timescales are being used in both scientific and policy context to describe the behavior of heat-absorbing gases in the atmosphere. These concepts are very important for the discussion on whether anthropogenic CO2 will be accumulated in the atmosphere and exert an additional global “Greenhouse Effect”
Compare Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 with the figure below that I (Ed) plotted using IPCC-approved data with monthly resolution with the bonus that the data extend to 2015. The plot shows that Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 is correct. The annual change in the Mauna Loa data is calculated by subtracting the data for 12-months prior
