by Edwin X Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM
To read rebuttal paper by Ed Berry, Click here
The Human Contribution to Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. CO2 Coaltion
Engelbeen F, Hannon R, Burton D (2024)
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/het6n
Human-Contribution-to-Atmospheric-CO2-digital-compressed.pdf
“Over the last 150 years, humans have emitted over 2,000 gigatons of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere, increasing the CO2 concentration by 50 percent from pre-Industrial Revolution levels.” – How the Planet Stores Our Excess Carbon Emissions – www.caltech.edu – Even Caltech is wrong!
About the Origin of CO2 in the Atmosphere: Some Annotations to a Study of the CO2 Coalition
Eike Roth
“The authors of [31] misinterpret some special features of the carbon cycle and sometimes they fall victim to heuristic traps. Therefore, they come to wrong conclusions, as will be shown in this reply.”
SCC-Roth-Origin-of-CO2-V5-1.pdf
Pitfalls in Global Warming and Climate Change Research: Flaws in Ice Core Reconstructions of Atmospheric CO2 – The Naked King of 280 ppm at the Industrial Revolution
Dai Ato
“This study mainly points to flaws that lead to the assumption of a mostly human-caused increase in CO2, in particular to the problems related to the methods used in the reconstruction from Antarctic ice cores and of the general consensus of 280 ppm CO2 at the onset of the Industrial Revolution.“
Atmospheric CO2: Exploring the Role of Sea Surface Temperatures and the Influence of Recent Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions
Bernard Robins
“The findings of the analyses suggest that an anthropogenic component is likely to be less than 10 % of the increase since the mid 1990s, with figures of up to around 6 % being estimated from data acquired since 1995.”
Hi Dr Ed,
keep up the good work. I hope President Trump is aware of your work, if not chase him up as he needs all the friends he can get.
we have the same problem in Australia.
Would it make sense for you to publish a library of relevant books that provide data supporting.Among the ones I prefer are: “UnSettled ?” by Steven E Koonin, “Global Warming: The Great Deception” by Guy K. Mitchell, Jr and “Inconvenient Facts” by Gregory Wrightstone.
Thank you Dr Ed.
I look foreword to part two.
Please note a lot of the links on your site no longer function.
Hi Ed,
Thanks for pointing us to https://scienceofclimatechange.org/ and all the work you do for us to publish the truth.
Be sure to send stuff to Trump through whitehouse.gov.
I was thinking of recommending you for Trumps climate czar! He needs one to counter all the sh*t Kerry spread around.
Hi Alex,
Thank you for noticing I omitted the link to SCC. Therefore, I just the link as you suggested.
Ed
Increase in human population and especially the increase in irrigation have resulted in an increase in water vapor of about 1.4 % per decade. Everyone paying attention is aware that water vapor is a ‘greenhouse gas’. This increase of water vapor is substantially more than possible from increase in average global temperature alone (feedback) and can explain all of the climate change attributable to humanity.
continue to be surprised at G Bush
gaffs.
hopefully Pres Trump can put a stop to this madness.
let the European community fund the parody known as United Nations.
is it public knowledge why some important UN offices are moving from NY to Africa?
I’m glad they’re leaving NY but wondering.
more a center of Marxism??
Dr. Ed…. You Assumed that Aristotle invented the scientific method but Socrates taught natural philosophy, which is the basis of empirical theory; that the physically possible is physically provable.
Plato taught that Kings and the philosophers who could guide the masses towards the enlightenment of the true forms. I think Plato’s philosophy was shaped by the murder of Socrates and his desire to establish a school to support his life style.
I can think of no other reason for modern society to forget the fact of the Scottish Enlightenment.
DMA
December 31, 2024 at 4:19 pm
This paper demonstrates lots of analysis and study. It enumerates several lines of thinking that can reasonably lead to the conclusion that most of the recent rise in atmospheric CO2 is human caused. I don’t think any of these can be considered proof. They all must, in my opinion, be viewed as evidence to be evaluated. What this paper lacks is proper discussion of alternate interpretations, data shortcomings, or an analysis of atmospheric CO2 flows such as Dr.Ed’s and Salby’s. I remain skeptical of their conclusion.
Edit
Reply
DMA
December 31, 2024 at 4:20 pm
On another line of thought: Here is a link to a video where Tom Shula falsifies the greenhouse effect hypothesis and shows a good analysis of the processes in the atmosphere that have produced the data that, even by the best, has been misinterpreted as evidence of that effect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtvRVNIEOMM
I would appreciate your thoughts on this work that seems to me to be valid and well reasoned. If it withstands review it should be the end of the CAGW hysteria.
—
David M. Albert, PLS
Edit