IPCC’s Climate Change Assumption is False
By Ed Berry to be added
Below is a copy of Unbekoming’s article open for your comments. Click this link to read Unbekoming’s original post and its comments: https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/dr-edwin-berry-nature-controls-climate
By Edwin X Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM They tell us to “Follow the Science.” What science? This advice itself contradicts the scientific method. Like when Jane brought a puppy to her Kindergarten class, and Nancy asked, “Is it a girl puppy or a boy puppy?” And Johnny replied, “Let’s vote on it!” All
by Ed Berry, PhD On September 7, 2018, I introduced the Climate Equivalence Principle (CEP) at the climate conference in Porto, Portugal. Above is my Slide #10. CEP says that because we cannot distinguish between human and natural-derived carbon atoms or CO2 molecules, they are identical and flow through the carbon cycle at the same rates. CEP
by Terry Oldberg I am attempting to correct an error in Wikipedia’s article on Earth’s climate system as it is currently written. Unfortunately, Wikipedia will not let me update its article. The error is to mistake an “abstract” event of the future for Earth’s climate system for a “concrete” event of the future for this
Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Here are seven proofs that human CO2 does not control the CO2 level. My published papers describe these proofs, but this summary may help people understand these proofs. Tell me what you think of these seven proofs in your comments. You may download a PDF of this post here.
Science of Climate Change is making its publications available at no cost. Here is a full copy that you may read and download. These posts are relevant to this post: The CO2 Coalition Is Wrong Because Its Physics Is Wrong (edberry.com) The Impact Of Human Co2 On Atmospheric Co2 – Summary (edberry.com)
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics On January 22, 2021, Elon Musk tweeted about climate change, “Am awarding $100 M towards a prize for best carbon capture technology.” Elon assumes, as most people do, that the following United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) theories are true: Human carbon dioxide emissions have caused all the
By Ed Berry, PhD, Physics In March 2022, the Los Angeles Times published an editorial that was 100% misinformation about what it called climate “misinformation.” Climate change alarmism is not based on science. It is based on money, politics, brainwashing, groupthink, and conditioned reflex as Pavlov did with his dogs. Far too many people, including
Courtesy of Elon Musk, some things we should know to think logically. Fundamental Attribution Error. When someone is late, it’s because they’re lazy. But if you’re late, it was the traffic. Self-Serving Bias. Attributing your successes to your skill and your screw ups to bad luck. In-Group Favoritism. Tendency to favor those in our group over those who are
by Ed Berry, PhD The journal, Science of Climate Change, published my landmark scientific paper on December 14, 2021. My paper, and papers by Murry Salby and Hermann Harde, are checkmate proof that natural CO2, not human CO2, causes most of the increase in atmospheric CO2. Physics proves our CO2 does not change our climate.
Monday, September 13, 2021by Dr. Ed Berry The world’s most costly scientific error is the false belief that human CO2 causes all the increase in atmospheric CO2. The truth is that nature causes most of the increase. The truth changes everything they have told you about climate change. My new scientific paper describes this widely promoted scientific
Below are the first two sections of the Introduction to my definitive paper on why IPCC’s core hypothesis is invalid. All the math and physics are done, but I am expanding the Introduction because too many people with PhD degrees still get confused. They don’t understand the basics of science because they have little or
Ed Berry “Trump pulls out of the UN Paris Climate Agreement” vs “More than 11,000 scientists from around the world declare a ‘climate emergency’” In a moment, I will to show you a simple proof that President Trump is a better climate scientist than all 11,000 climate science imposters who claim we have a “climate
[Updated 8/26/2020 – Ed] On July 4, 2019, the International Journal of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences published my scientific paper, “Human CO2 Emissions have little Effect on Atmospheric CO2.“ Because it is easy to read even for non-scientists, I encourage you to download the free PDF of my paper here. My paper’s 9000 plus words
by Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics, CCM On January 8, I left home at 4:10 am and arrived at the Glacier International Airport at 4:40 am. Delta Airlines flew me to Salt Lake City and then to Phoenix, Arizona. After unwinding at my hotel, I took a taxi to the Phoenix Convention Center and the American
Micheal Crichton describes the fundamental political problem of climate change: it is a religion promoted by nutcases who dismiss facts, logic, and science that contradicts their environmental belief. I have taken the liberty to bold some of his sentences to make his message more clear. – Ed by Michael Crichton Caltech Michelin Lecture January 17, 2003
Human CO2 does not cause climate change. Below is the image of the 4’x 8′ poster I will use for my presentation to the American Meteorological Society on January 8, 2019. Scroll down to see larger views. For explanations, please read my preprint. Better yet, if your group would like to host my public presentation, you may
by Mark J. Perry, AEI (excerpt) As part of my series of posts this week to recognize the green holy day called Earth Day, here’s what Michael Crichton had to say about “scientific consensus” back in 2003 when he gave a lecture at the California Institute of Technology titled “Aliens Cause Global Warming” (emphasis mine):
by Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics The American Meteorological Society (AMS) published my paper: “Contradictions to IPCC’s Climate Change Theory” AMS published my original abstract here with a link at the bottom of the page where you can download my full paper in 2-column pdf format. I will present my paper at the AMS annual meeting