What is really behind the increase in atmospheric CO2?
https://youtu.be/rohF6K2avtY
The science of the people who want to be FREE
The science of the people who want to be FREE
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Thank you Dr. Ed for posting this video. I was so glad to see this and your response to Kohler 2017. I am hopeful that the non-physical universe it describes is finally being exposed. I view the censoring of Harde as one of the worst instances of ideological climatism.
Is it this You are refering to:
“Scrutinizing the carbon cycle and CO2residence time in the atmosphere”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818117301364
Dear Marcus,
You properly reference the link to Kohler et al (2017). My preprint shows why Kohler et al. are seriously wrong in their comment and Harde (2017) and why Harde is correct.
The document (https://mlsxmq.wixsite.com/salby-macquarie/page-1f) Salby references in relation to his employment woes was new to me. I had only seen the short account he had given to Jo Nova. This was a truly outrageous set of actions by Macquaire U. to cash in on the Global Warming hysteria and prevent him from publishing his findings that would undermine that cash cow. I certainly hope we all can work on getting this nonsense ended.
Dr. Ed
In his presentation Salby points out the purported 82 year offset of trapped air age compared to the surrounding ice’s age in ice cores. This should be verifiable by checking for the 1960s C14 spike in the 1880’s ice layers. Do you know if anyone has done that work?
As I think about the process of getting from snow fall to ice core I find it boggling that some think there is an accurate preservation of atmospheric samples with finely defined ages.
Dear DMA,
In my Preprint, I write:
“Segalstad (1998), Ball (2008, 2013, 2018), and Salby (2014) present evidence that the CO2 level before 1750 was much higher than 280 ppm.”
References:
Ball, T., 2008: Pre-industrial CO2 levels were about the same as today. How and why we are told otherwise. http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=2258.
Ball, T., 2013: Why and how the IPCC demonized CO2 with manufactured information. WattsUpWithThat. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/11/13/why-and-how-the-ipcc-demonized-co2-with-manufactured-information/.
Ball, T., 2018: What do ice-core bubbles really tell us? WattsUpWithThat. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/01/20/what-do-the-ice-core-bubbles-really-tell-us/.
Salby, Murry, 2014: CO2 follows the Integral of Temperature, video. http://edberry.com/blog/climate-physics/agw-hypothesis/murry-salby-co2-follows-integral-of-temperature/.
Segalstad, T. V. 1998: Carbon cycle modelling and the residence time of natural and anthropogenic atmospheric CO2: on the construction of the “Greenhouse Effect Global Warming” dogma. In: Bate, R. (Ed.): Global warming: the continuing debate. ESEF, Cambridge, U.K. [ISBN 0952773422]: 184-219. Available at: http://www.co2web.info/ESEF3VO2.pdf
Other references…(Note references you decide validity.)
True C02 Record Buried Under Gore:
http://21sci-tech.com/Articles%202007/True_CO2_Record.pdf
180 Years accurate CO2 – Gasanalysis of Air by Chemical Methods (Short version):
http://www.pensee-unique.fr/001_180_years_accurate_Co2_Chemical_Methods.pdf
Full version:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1260/095830507780682147
Evidence of variability of atmospheric CO2 concentration during the 20th century (2008):
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.395.3217&rep=rep1&type=pdf
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1260/095830507780682147
CD,
Very good references! Thanks.
Ed, given that most of the increase in CO2 levels to the current 410 PPM is due to natural causes, have you done any research or aware of any research, which might predict when our CO2 levels will start to decline? It will be a real game changer when CO2 levels start to decline even though man’s emissions continue!
WHY CANT THIS INFORMATION GET TO THOSE IN PARLIAMENT / CONGRESS ??? ARE THEY ALL CORRUPT OR STUPID?
With a few exceptions.. yes.
But perhaps the public is a silent accessory.
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” -Edmund Burke
do nothing and nothing happens