The 2024 Election is between Good and Evil
Edwin X Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM
The Bible (Hosea 8:4) describes Montana’s 2024 primary election:
They set up kings without my consent; they choose princes without my approval. With their silver and gold, they make idols for themselves to their own destruction.
Hosea 8:4 New International Version 4
A cabal of evil Montana Republicans – that includes Senator Daines, wannabe Senator Sheehy, Congressman Zinke, Governor Gianforte, and Attorney General Knudsen – choose Tim Sheehy for Senator without our approval. With their money and power, they make idols for themselves to their own destruction.
These evil Republicans are helping the World Economic Forum (WEF) take over Montana, America, and our lives by 2030. These evil Republicans are helping to steal Montana’s freedom and turn good Montanans into slaves. By their works we will know them.
On June 4, 2024, Montana Republicans will nominate their candidates for US Senate, Congress, Governor, and Attorney General. Few voters know they will be choosing between good and evil.
If Republicans nominate the cabal candidates, we can kiss Montana’s freedom and economy goodbye.
Our only way to save our freedom is to vote for Brad Johnson for US Senate, Mary Todd for Congress, and Tanner Smith for Governor. Read more about them below and in The Freedom Candidates.
I have seen the face of evil.
My professional work in climate physics and my effort to bring climate truth to the people and our elected leaders has let me see things few ever get to see. I know people who are helping the World Economic Forum (WEF) to take over Montana. Daines, Sheehy, Zinke, Gianforte, and Knudsen are among them. The Montana GOP President supports them.
They all continue to support Knudsen and his intentional loss of Held v Montana and the damage his loss caused to Montana’s children… proving they are evil.
I write this to warn you. Every preacher, pastor, priest, and rabbi, scientist, public servant, and all who care about truth and freedom must warn Montana voters before June 4, or these voters may vote for their own slavery.
The World Economic Forum plans to make us slaves.
The World Economic Forum (and Bill Gates) wants to cull 80 percent of the world’s population and take ownership of our land and property, so we will, in their words, own nothing, go nowhere, eat bugs, and “be happy” submissive, quiet socialists. Their planned “great reset” now in progress plans to put America under socialism.
WEF uses the climate myth to feed its political power. If we kill the climate myth, we will kill the World Economic Forum.
The climate myth is the pseudoscientific claim that our CO2 emissions change the climate. Read more about why the climate cultists are scientifically wrong here: WEF Climate, Amicus Brief, Epoch Times, Berry Papers.
Montana AG Knudsen purposely lost the Held v Montana climate lawsuit.
AG Knudsen could have easily defeated Held v Montana, but he purposely acted to destroy Montana. He only needed to defend climate truth, which is easy. He had three years to prepare his defense, but he gave away the trial in the first few minutes on June 12, 2023. Knudsen’s trial attorney stipulated the Montana defense agrees with the Plaintiffs’ climate and damage claims. Game over. WEF won.
Knudsen’s trial attorneys did not challenge any Plaintiff expert witness. They had no expert witnesses in climate or law. They laid down a legal red carpet to let the Plaintiffs easily win Held v Montana. Knudsen is not that stupid. Knudsen is evil. He secretly takes orders from evil people.
A good trial attorney and good climate expert witnesses would easily have proved the plaintiffs’ experts were scientifically wrong. Had Montana defeated Held v Montana, Montana would have saved America and seriously harmed the World Economic Forum.
In May 2022, I explained by email to Knudsen’s assistant AG how to easily defeat Held v Montana. Knudsen’s assistant AG liked my suggestions and began to sign me up as an expert witness. However, at the Kalispell Pachyderm meeting on Friday, June 3, 2022, I mentioned that I was helping Knudsen win Held v Montana to the wrong person. That person could not control his visible anger over what I told him. He rushed out the room when the meeting ended. When I returned to my office, I found that Knudsen had blocked his assistant AG from communicating with me.
To assure Montana lost Held v Montana, AG Knudsen blacklisted me long before May 2022. After May 2022, Knudsen blacklisted the climate experts I recommended to defeat Held v Montana.
I have been an expert witness in several climate-related lawsuits, mostly in California, and I have a perfect win record. I was the lead expert witness for the defense in a highly publicized murder trial brought by the California AG. Our expert team met before the trial to plan and practice our defense. I was on the witness stand for five days as the two AG attorneys tried to break my testimony. I won, they lost, and the jury concluded the accused was innocent.
I am one of the few scientists who knows how to win lawsuits and also one of the few scientists who has published papers that prove our CO2 does not change the climate.
Knudsen’s purposeful loss of Held v Montana gives the World Economic Forum a legal pathway to checkmate Montana’s economy, energy production, and education. His loss gives Democrats free reign to indoctrinate Montana’s kids in the climate myth and global government, which is child abuse.
Knudsen appealed the lower court’s decision to the Montana Supreme Court. Even if the Montana Supreme Court overturns the lower court’s decision on the basis of legal technicalities, Montana Republicans will still have lost the critical courtroom debate for science truth needed to stop the World Economic Forum.
In June 2022, I warned that Knudsen would lose Held v Montana because he censored the scientists who would have defeated Held v Montana.
In May 2022, at his home in Bozeman, I suggested to Governor Gianforte that he do his own defense of Held v Montana. He was very interested. He told me he would have his attorney call me, but that never happened. At a later meeting in Kalispell, I asked him why he did not do his own defense. He told me AG Knudsen should do the defense for all defendants. It appears someone got to Governor Gianforte.
Governor Gianforte and AG Knudsen made sure Montana lost the Held v Montana climate lawsuit by not defending it.
In July 2022, I proposed to a Kalispell Republican angel group that they fund an Intervention to Held v Montana. I estimated it would cost about $300,000 for the attorney and expert witnesses and their travel. The money was not a problem, but they declined. Montana will pay much more than $300,000 to the Plaintiffs’ attorneys when the Montana Supreme Court upholds the district court’s decision.
On June 20, 2023, District Court Judge Seeley gave the Plaintiffs the win Held v Montana.
Senator Daines wrote almost immediately on X:
Activist judges, even here in MT, are helping far-Left environmentalists push their green hallucination down the throats of Americans. Shutting down energy projects that support an all-of-the-above energy portfolio is setting America on a dangerous path. We must reverse course.
Tim Sheehy, wannabe US Senator, showed he cannot think for himself when he parroted Daines on X:
The latest example of a liberal activist judge trying to legislate radical Green New Deal disastrous policies from the bench. We must fight back and take a strong stand against the climate cult and their job-killing agenda.
Daines and Sheehy spout off before they get the facts. Judge Seeley is not an “activist judge.” Judge Seeley made the correct decision based on the data presented. I watched the whole trial. Montana lost because AG Knudsen did not defend Held v Montana.
In May 2024, Senator Daines sent a letter to Montana Republicans supporting AG Knudsen’s reelection. Daines wrote Knudsen is “on the front lines, fighting for our freedoms and defending our way of life.”
Senator Daines lies to cover for Knudsen’s purposeful loss of Held v Montana. Knudsen did not fight for our freedom or defend our way of life. Knudsen purposely acted to destroy our freedom and our way of life.
What’s the scoop on climate?
Climate alarmism is based on the false assumption human CO2 stays in the atmosphere much longer than natural CO2. But that is impossible because human and natural CO2 molecules are identical. Natural and human CO2 have the same half-life in the atmosphere, which according to the IPCC, is about 2.5 years.
These facts easily compute that natural CO2 is now about 400 ppm and human CO2 is about 20 ppm. This means human CO2 is negligible and cannot have any measurable effect on climate change. It also means carbon taxes or carbon capture are useless because they cannot stop mother nature from increasing the CO2 level.
The myth of “human-caused climate change” is the most destructive myth in human history. It destroys minds as well as national economies.
Mary Todd vs Ryan Zinke
There is no question that retired Navy Seal Commander Zinke, behind a gun or not, is a physical force to be reckoned with. But he is neither smart enough to learn about climate truth nor brave enough to defend climate truth. Zinke supports the climate myth of the World Economic Forum.
Mary Todd is much smarter than Zinke. She has dealt with more government problems than Zinke. She has suffered more due to government actions and inactions than Zinke. Mary Todd will make a better member of Congress than Zinke.
Mary Todd’s book – Hard Drive, A Family’s Fight Against Three Countries – is about who left her son, Dr. Shane Truman Todd, a young American engineer, hanging in his Singapore Apartment just a week before his scheduled return to the United States. Her book describes her fight with three countries to find the truth.
Mary Todd writes,
In June of 2012, my son’s life was unjustly taken. Shane died because he was unwilling to illegally trade American secrets. We are still waiting for justice. When I tell you that I am courageous, know that I have had to face the giants. When I tell you that I will give a voice to the voiceless, it’s because I, too, had my voice taken away. When I tell you I will listen to those who have been ignored, it’s because I, too, have been brushed off. When I tell you that I will look you in the eye and fight for your needs, no matter the cost or odds of success, know that I mean it. Because I, too, have been avoided and cast aside. Because of my experiences, I can assure you that my resolve and dedication to the security of this country and to the safety of your family will never waiver.
We are currently in a battle for our nation’s survival. A battle between those who love America and those who hate her. Those who hate her want to destroy it. Those who love America want to keep the American way of life and uphold our Constitution. This is a fight we must win.
Mary Todd attended my climate lecture in March 2024. Zinke was in town, but he refused my invitation to attend.
Zinke calls himself a “scientist” to justify his rejection of climate truth. He is not a scientist, and he has not taken one minute of his time in four years to talk to me about climate. But he spent hours listening to the pseudoscience claims of climate cultists.
Zinke believes our CO2 causes dangerous climate change. His solution to climate change is to negotiate an agreement with the Democrats on how to stop climate change. He has my book, Climate Miracle, but he has not read it.
Zinke did not support climate truth when he led the US Department of Interior. He chose James Reilly, a geologist who believes our CO2 changes the climate, to lead the US Geological Survey. He still uses Reilly as his “climate” consultant. Zinke told me he has no time to talk to me about climate. He told me to go through Reilly, who does not understand climate physics.
Zinke doesn’t know the difference between a geologist and a physicist, or between an ecologist and a physicist, and probably between a chiropractor and a brain surgeon.
Zinke will continue to waste our tax dollars on irrational attempts to stop climate change. He is part of the cabal that supports WEF and wants to elect Sheehy.
Brad Johnson v Tim Sheehy
Brad Johnson is a conservative and proven Montana leader. In 1982, he served as a campaign coordinator for the Montana Republican nominee for US Senate. His conservative values and strong faith guided him while he was serving as Montana’s conservative Secretary of State. Brad’s experiences and long tenure in Montana provide him with an in-depth understanding of the issues that matter most to Montanans.
Brad is known for his unwavering commitment to do the right thing for his constituents. His strong reputation for hard work and sincerity have never been questioned. Brad has earned respect even from his political opposition for always prioritizing the needs of his constituents.
Montana has never seen a campaign as fishy as the cabal’s campaign for Sheehy.
We don’t know the real Sheehy. The cabal writes his emails and produces his videos. He sends us dozens of emails every day. He has YouTube videos everywhere we go. He has never held a public office. He is not even from Montana. He is not a cowboy. His past record shows he is a liberal. He does not have a clue about what Montanans want or need.
In the fall of 2023, I attended a Pachyderm meeting to meet Sheehy personally. His talk was a long boring monotone. He held the mic too close to his mouth, overloading the mic, causing big pops from the speakers. When he finished his talk, he disappeared, vanished. He did not stay to meet Montana voters.
On May 5, 2024, the Montana Association of Rabbis and the Montana Jewish Project called on Sheehy to reject hatred, antisemitism, and bigotry. See their full letter here. Read more about Tim Sheehy here.
On the subject of bigotry alone, Democrat Tester will defeat Sheehy in the November election if Montanans nominate Sheehy.
Brad Johnson is the best candidate to defeat Tester.
Tanner Smith v Greg Gianforte
Tanner J. Smith, a true son of Montana, is running for Governor to champion the values and needs of his fellow Montanans. Born and raised in the heart of “God’s country,” Tanner’s roots run deep in this state he loves. As a devoted husband and father to five children, ages 10 to 23, Tanner embodies the spirit of community and family. His commitment to creating safe, thriving communities and schools is evident in his proactive involvement and leadership, from serving on the Somers/Lakeside District 29 school board to representing HD11 as a State Representative
In these roles, Tanner has been a steadfast advocate for the voice of the community, ensuring our constitutional rights are not just recognized but fiercely protected. As a second-generation business owner in Flathead, and now passing the torch to his sons making it a third-generation business, Tanner understands the challenges and rewards of sustaining a family business through tough times.
Tanner’s conservative values guide his commitment to safeguarding individual rights, especially concerning the well-being of our communities, schools, and places of worship. By casting your vote for Tanner, you’re supporting a candidate who vows to uphold the Constitution and advocate for the interests of Montana residents.
Tanner is willing to listen to me about climate truth.
Governor Gianforte calls himself a “scientist,” which he is not, to justify his rejection of my work on climate truth. He has not taken one minute of his time in four years to talk to me about climate. But he has spent hours listening to the pseudoscience claims of climate cultists.
What’s wrong with government?
Elon Musk explained why SpaceX developed its Dragon spacecraft in less than half the time that Boeing developed its Starliner spacecraft, and also at half the cost of Boeing. Musk said Boeing had “too many non-technical managers.”
Musk’s observation applies to our government. Montana and America are losing on economy and quality education because our government has too many non-technical and non-scientific managers who don’t even know who to call to get valid information on climate physics. So, they believe the eco-freaks.
Montana’s non-technical managers – Senator Daines, Congressman Zinke, Governor Gianforte, and their chosen wannabe Senator Sheehy – refuse to call a climate physicist to help them make climate decisions. They would not know to call ghostbusters to get rid of ghosts.
Vote for the freedom candidates, Brad Johnson, Mary Todd, and Tanner Smith because they know when to call a climate physicist.
Vote for freedom in 2024 to dump Daines in 2026.
If we elect our freedom candidates in 2024, we can dump Senator Daines in 2026.
I will support Dr. Al Olszewski for US Senate in 2026 if he runs. Dr. Al Olszewski strongly supports climate truth and our freedom. He would make an excellent Senator. But if the cabal wins in 2024, they will shut out Dr. Al in 2026.
Vote for freedom.
Vote for Brad Johnson for US Senate, Mary Todd for Congress, and Tanner Smith for Governor.
Thank you, Dr. Berry, for your excellent analysis of the difference between candidates, and why voting on June 4th is so important. I hope people care enough to listen to your warning, research on their own and spread the truth. Climate change is another hoax, similar to covid, to control and manipulate us. “When tyranny reigns, resistance is duty.”
Ed, you know I greatly respect you and your work. But you’ve made a classic mistake here.
Your assessments of sell-out power mongers Sheehy, Gianforte and Zinke are exactly right, and no freedom-loving conservative should even consider voting for any of them.
But respectfully sir, we conservatives — out of disgust and desperation — often embrace alternatives who, in their own ways, are just as bad or worse. We fail to apply the same standards to all candidates. Then we make up stories about how “great” these alternatives are — descriptions of people who essentially don’t exist. Ridiculous stories, taken out of thin air — like your comments about Brad Johnson. (As a careful, precise, evidence-based and analytical scientist Ed, this is out of character for you.) Anyone who has ever worked with Johnson (I did for 6 years) recognizes immediately that he is the exact opposite of the things you (and others) wishfully say about him.
I’ll vote for Mary Todd with no conflict of conscience, but Johnson, and the Smith-Pinocci team are totally unacceptable on both moral and philosophical grounds. We would rue the day if they were elected.
In situations like this, the BEST vote is a NO vote in a particular race. Leaving it blank. NO votes noticeably stand out as a rejection of all candidates in those contests. They are a true and principled protest, that if large enough, sends shock waves into the general election. A write-in could accomplish the same thing, but a non-vote might even be better, because it communicates our disgust for the Republican Party’s inability to put on the ballot, honorable men and women, who will put prideful ambition aside, defend the Constitution and obey a sovereign God. Let’s be smart, and not reflexively substitute one evil for another.
I’ll close by saying that I do understand people’s ballot security concerns about leaving races unmarked. Ideally, ballots should have a “none of the above” option for every race. If all candidate choices are simply unacceptable, i.e., if voting for any candidate in that race would constitute a personal endorsement of evil, then “none of the above” would fix that. A good bill for the next legislative session – but how many of our fine “conservative” Republican legislators do you suppose would support it?