Why Montana needs the Water Compact
by Dr. Ed Berry In late November 2014, before I studied the Compact, I opposed the Compact. But a good scientist…
The science of the people who want to be FREE
by Dr. Ed Berry In late November 2014, before I studied the Compact, I opposed the Compact. But a good scientist…
by Dr. Ed Berry The year is 2025, ten years after the Montana legislature acted on the CSKT Water Compact….
Please go to this link to read my 2020 candidate recommendations for Montana. Sorry for the wrong link in my…
by Dr. Ed Berry Here’s the untold story behind my first scientific publication where you may find the story more interesting than the…
by Dr. Ed Berry Compact opponents think, incorrectly, their every complaint against the Compact is a reason to reject the Compact….
by Colleen Coyle, former Senior Water Master, Montana Water Court On December 10, 2014, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes…
How old is the Earth?
Chemtrail Delusions vs Scientific Method
Expert Witness Projects since 2010 by Edwin X Berry, PhD, Certified Consulting Meteorologist (Download PDF) January – March 2010 Represented…
Add Soaring
The Secret of Climate Change
by Dr. Ed Berry The question is: “Is America worth saving?” Dinesh D’Souza’s “America: Imagine a World without Her” explains why…
A tribute to the U.S. military service personnel who gave their all for our freedom.
The Voting Principle defines moral voting and it prevails over the Mantras and over those who preach against it.
Accusers who say we have “sold out”, or “flip-flopped” by backing the winner of a Republican primary, are the ones who have “sold out” on moral principles.
Widely accepted moral teachings say when there are “two evils” in an election, we must reject third-party candidates who cannot possible win and vote for the candidate who will do the least evil and do the most good.
Those who say we should not vote for the “lesser of two evils” promote immoral actions and the greater evil.
Those who vote to achieve the most possible good from the options available act morally, logically, intelligently, and according to common sense.
The lesser evil Mantra conflicts with logic and with the principles of all major Christian religions. Conservatives must attack the logic and Christianity of radical rightwing leaders and the Mantras they promote, until the leaders’ followers wake up and realize they are being led astray by their false prophets.
Montana Professor Steve Running is not a Nobel Laureate
The Tea Party voting Mantra, “A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil” is invalid from the viewpoints of logic, science, religion, and philosophy. Therefore, the Mantra is a religion unto itself.
Republican leaders must realize the tea party Libertarians or rightwing third-party voters are not fundamentally a political party. They are a minority religion that believes in the Mantra.
A common Tea Party Voting Mantra is:
“A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil”
Montana’s tea party Libertarians use it as their personal “feely-good” justification to not vote for the “lesser evil” Republican candidate while knowing full well the result of their actions will help elect the “greater evil” Democrat candidate.
Pirelli, an amazing walk on Christ The Redeemer