Montana and 18 States filed to do an Intervention that is doomed to fail.
The only, way to defeat this lawsuit is to prove its climate assumtions are wrong.
Knudsen censored Dr. Ed Berry and refused to talk to Berry’s climate team who would have EASILY defeated Held v Montana.
The LvT lawsuit is not about claimed damages to the states. The plaintiffs lawsuit is about its claimed damages that will result from the EO’s. All the references are legal decisions which say nothing about the climate issue.
At the beginning of the Held v Montana trial, Assistant AG Michael Russell stipulated,
“… for the purposes of trial, there is a scientific consensus that earth is warming as a direct result of human GHG emissions, primarily from the burning of fossil fuels.”
AG Knudsen refused to defend Held v Montana proving AG Knudsen is a puppet of the World Economic Form. Knudsen made zero arguments, presented zero witnesses, and handed the plaintiffs’ attorneys a simple victory. It may have been the worst defense in legal history.
Judge Seeley properly ruled, on the evidence presented in court, that the Plaintiffs won.
AG Knudsen has no intention of defeating LvT. This Intervention, if approved, will fail just like Montana’s appeal of Held v Montana failed in Montana’s Supreme Court. It will distract any valid defenses that Trump may use.
Dr. Ed,
I plan to write to some scientists who may be of like mind to yours regarding H1. I would like to put into plain language what the “Montana Intervention” is attempting to accomplish. I gather from your text they are not helping to defeat the lawsuit. But are they actively intervening in favor of the plaintiffs or just unwittingly trying an ill-founded defense?