Ed Berry
For truth and freedom, Kid.
(Read the devastating review “Tim Sheehy violates Naval Honor Code” by Mick Ringsak, a Vietnam veteran who lives in Butte, Montana.)
ferently than I do. That’s OK. That’s why we vote. That’s politics. No problemo.
I grade Tim Sheehy and Ryan Zinke as Evil.
Sheehy and Zinke earn my Evil grades because of the following:
- Sheehy and Zinke support Montana’s deliberate loss of Held v Montana.
- This loss was the most deliberate evil event I have ever seen in politics.
- This loss was child abuse because it allows climate indoctrination of kids.
- This loss was evil because it helped WEF take over America.
- This loss was evil because it depended upon censorship of climate truth.
- This loss censored the climate truth that Trump needs for his energy plan.
- This loss censored the climate truth that Montana needs for its energy plan.
- Sheehy and Zinke censored me and reject climate truth.
- Sheehy and Zinke are evil because they are puppets of the evil Party Boss.
- If we put them in Congress, they will continue to censor climate truth.
I tried to help Montana defeat Held v Montana, but the evil Party Boss censored me forced AG Knudsen to purposely throw Held v Montana.
I have seen the hidden face of evil in Montana’s Republican Party. I will vote for Tester and Tranel because OK is better than Evil.
America is an individualistic country.
Third, sending bad guys who are puppets of an evil puppet master to Congress will make America worse, not better.
Facts on Held v Montana
Held v Montana, brought by Our Children’s Trust of Oregon, was billed as the first-ever constitutional climate science trial in America.
On June 12, 2023, just before the trial began, Montana Assistant Attorney General Michael Russell stipulated,
“for the purposes of trial, there is a scientific consensus that earth is warming as a direct result of human GHG emissions, primarily from the burning of fossil fuels.”
The HvM trial, which ended on June 20, 2023, will go down in history as the trial where Montana Republicans censored climate truth. This may be the biggest Republican cave-in to Democrats in history.
We must vote the evil out of Montana’s Republican Party.
Sheehy and Rep Zinke, Gov Gianforte, and AG Knudsen are RATS (Republicans Against Truth).
Party Boss told Knudsen to lose Held v Montana. He complied, inflicting more damage on Republicans than any Democrat has ever done. Party Boss told RATS to support Knudsen’s loss. They complied.
Party Boss told RATS to have the State of Montana attack and censor me because I teach climate truth that would have defeated HvM. They complied.
Party Boss serves the World Economic Forum that needed Montana to lose HvM so they can make us slaves who will own nothing, eat insects, and be happy, by 2030.
Sheehy’s a Trojan horse who can’t remember who he is. Zinke lies to Trump.
Our greatest enemy is not each other. The battle between Rs and Ds is a distraction.
Our greatest enemy is the World Economic Forum and its associated deep state, and rich dudes like Bill Gates who is buying up US farmland to reduce our future food supply.
WEF wants to own the world. They are rich. They are smart. They are organized.
If we were smart, we would fight our common enemy rather than split the Republican Party.
WEF must keep voters delusional about climate. People who believe their carbon emissions threaten the planet will approve government laws and taxes that will enslave them. Covid fraud is connected to climate fraud but that is another story.
WEF says they will control America by 2030, making us just one Senate term from being WEF slaves who will “own nothing, go nowhere, eat insects, and be happy.”
WEF needs to elect its people to Congress, so they can help WEF achieve its 2030 goals.
How to identify WEF candidates.
WEF Republicans are those who
- Support AG Knudsen’s purposeful loss of Held v Montana.
- Censor climate truth.
- Refused to be a party to my Amicis Brief on HvM.
Yesterday, I listed six traitor Republicans who check all three boxes.
These Montana WEFs are Senator Daines, Senate candidate Sheehy, Rep Zinke, Rep candidate Downing, Gov Gianforte, and AG Knudsen.
Good people are open to hearing climate truth even if they don’t believe it. Good people don’t censor climate truth.
If Montana had defeated HvM, it would have stopped WEF’s plan for America.
So, WEF made sure Knudsen purposely lost Held v Montana.
The media will not report what happened inside Knudsen’s office but his blatant non-defense of HvM cannot be hidden.
Montana is an easy WEF target. With a few WEF influencers, WEF can use money or threats to control elected officials.
WEF is after you, but I am in its way.
Since I am the only person in Montana who teaches and defends climate truth, what Trump says about himself also applies to me.
That’s why Montana censored me, blacklisted me, and tried (but failed) to destroy my climate business. By contrast, California contracted with me to do its largest wind energy survey and its key long-range drought prediction, and never harassed me.
There are many ways I could have helped Montana save a lot of money, but Rep Zinke, Gov Gianforte, and AG Knudsen chose to follow the climate eco-freaks and censor me. They don’t understand professions. Would they choose an eco-freak to cure a heart attack?
WEF Republicans say elect Sheehy to the US Senate so he can help Trump. Their lie is that Daines and Zinke are WEF’s who do not support Trump, and Sheehy is their Trojan Horse who supports climate fiction rather than Trump.
What I do know is that Sheehy censors me, censors climate truth, and supports Knudsen’s loss of Held v Montana.
WEF Republicans are using the madness of crowds to try to elect Tim Sheehy as US Senator. They may succeed.
Here’s more:
Costs of climate fiction
Climate fiction costs America more than America pays for its national defense. If we remove climate alarmism, we could eliminate America’s annual deficit. What’s that worth?
Is it worth the six traitors taking an hour of their time to talk to me about climate change? Obviously, it is, but the six traitors will not talk to me for one second.
No rational Republican can support Montana’s deliberate loss of Held v Montana.
Losing Held v Montana was not like your favorite football team playing hard but losing a game. It is like your favorite football team sitting on the grass drinking beer as its opponent scores as many goals as they can. It’s outrageous.
AG Knudsen put up no defense and stipulated that he agrees with all the plaintiffs’ climate claims. That is not a defense.
Only enemies of America can support Knudsen’s purposeful loss. Knudsen harmed children, harmed America, and harmed your future.
The six traitors are RATS (Republicans Against Truth).
Censorship hurts everybody.
Vance and Walz agree that censorship is the biggest enemy of Democracy.
The six traitors actively promote censorship.
A Daines’ recent letter picks on Harris and Walz for their support of climate alarmism but omits that he himself is a greater climate alarmist than they are.
Daines supports Knudsen’s purposeful loss of Held v Montana. He supports an action that caused far more harm to Republicans than Harris and Walz have ever done.
In November 2022, Zinke told me he would invite me to speak to Congress about climate change. In July 2023, Zinke changed his mind and told me he did not support my position on climate change.
Sheehy won’t talk to me for one second about climate.
Sheehy is a Trojan Horse who will help WEF destroy America.
We don’t know the real Tim Sheehy. But the madness of crowds may get him elected.
We can’t trust Sheehy to represent Montana Republicans because Daines and Zinke choose him and unethically used Trump to block Matt Rosendale from running for Senate. What do Daines and Zinke have against free primary elections?
We know the government gave Sheehy’s company a big grant to put out forest fires on the assumption that putting out forest fires reduces CO2 in the atmosphere, which it does not do. Sheehy paid himself $500,000 per year out of this grant.
Government contracts do not allow one to pay oneself this much money. Therefore, Sheehy owes somebody a big favor. Sheehy has profited immensely by representing climate fiction and he’s not going to change his liberal stripes.
Something is really fishy about Tim Sheehy.
The three former military candidates
Zinke, Downing, and Sheehy are Montana’s three candidates for Congress. They served in the military, which is nice, but this does not mean they are conservatives. Democrats serve in the military too. There are military generals and admirals who are climate alarmists.
Rather the best indication of their political orientation is they refused to be a party to my Amicus Brief for the Held v Montana climate lawsuit. They support Knudsen’s purposeful loss of Held v Montana.
Who’s better to represent Montana?
The MTGOP promotes the false idea that anyone who puts an R after their name is good.
An honest Democrat is better than a lying traitor Republican.
Tester is an honest Democrat who has roots in Montana. He has significant seniority in the Senate which is valuable to Montana. Senator Tester is a known senator.
Sheehy is an unknown and a big risk. Since I no longer trust Daines and Zinke, I cannot trust Sheehy.
Dear Ed:
Thank you for relentlessly standing up against the forces of evil!
Co2 is the fuel of life. That is all that you need to know! it has expended 98% of its heat trapping ability.
Sorry, Ed, but I cannot support Tester. He is like a broken clock…no, actually he is NEVER correct. He is a died in the wool Leftist Democrat who stabbed Trump in the back and voted TWICE to impeach him and is as much a WEF puppet as you claim Sheehy is. Trump has endorsed Sheehy.
There are larger issues at stake by helping the Democrats keep control of the Senate, although defeating the Climate Change Scams and Scammers are still at the top of the list. But if we lose the Senate and lose control of the country to the Democats, the Climate Change Scammers will be ramming their agenda down our throats full speed ahead along with the entire WEF agenda….that is too high a price to pay over MAYBE getting Tester to oppose their agenda, but don’t count on it.
https://news.yahoo.com/news/eyes-montana-sen-tester-last-030000979.html
“I would certainly say that Jon Tester is the most vulnerable Democrat out there in the country,” said Chuck Denowh, a Republican consultant in Montana who worked on the 2020 campaigns of Montana Sen. Steve Daines and Rep. Matt Rosendale.
“Tester’s strategy is to distance himself [from the Biden-Harris administration and their disastrous record] and pretend to be something that he hasn’t been for the last six years, but I think the voters here get it.”….He has voted WITH Biden and the Democrats more than 90% of the time, so he is as much to blame for the current disaster as they are.
Dear TEWS,
I understand. There are good arguments each way.
But the disaster of Montana losing Held v Montana changed everything. It revealed the Republicans who side with Democrats on this critical lawsuit.
My argument is based on Sheehy’s, Daines’, and Zinke’s unnecessary censorship of everything related to climate truth, and their support of AG Knudsen’s WEF-directed, purposeful loss of Held v Montana.
Why would Daines, Sheehy, and Zinke approve this loss and censor me? It has been very easy for any of them to call me and ask to talk.
I attended a Zinke fundraiser a few months ago to talk to him. He refused to talk, and he made it clear that he did not want me there.
Now, add the fact that climate truth can save America its whole annual deficit, so every true Republican should be interested in how to save this money.
Trump would have a better chance to win if Republicans would support climate truth. So, Sheehy’s refusal to support climate truth, or even to talk about it, indicates he does not really support Trump.
That’s just too much conspiracy for me to sweep under the rug. So, I conclude that Sheehy is a bigger danger to America and Montana than Tester.
It is a conundrum. Tester MIGHT help push back on Green Scams, but he would help the Democrats keep the Senate and thwart ALL of Trump’s agenda and probably vote for more impeachments.
Sheehy might possibly vote against Trump’s climate policy or he might still be pulled over to support it, but at least he would help the Republicans take the Senate and where they could implement Trump’s agenda, which includes rolling back ALL of the Green Scams. That looks like the bigger prize, but we all know both parties are just two heads of the Uniparty snake, and NONE of them can be trusted.
Why not abstain and vote for neither Tester or Sheehy?
Republicans have pretty much caved to the premise that man has caused the climate to change. Anytime a journalist brings it up, Republicans have no argument. At least Trump did not support the Paris accord. The problem is Big Climate and the media attack anyone who opposes the premise. If their hypothesis was strong, they wouldn’t need to attack. I always ask, give me one shred of evidence that CO2 causes temperature and not the other way around? Crickets. Most Republicans and Democrats are two sides of the same coin. Trump isn’t one of those coins. We have very few like him.
Ed Berry is an amazing atmospheric scientist and climate change educator, competitive athlete and sailor and very important expert witness in legal battles over terrible climate change dogma and policies.
It is surprising to see that the political and legal systems in Montana are as messed up as in other states and the Federal Government.
For the sake of America’s future, may the truth and excellence that Ed Berry fights for prevail!
Dear Bob,
You ask, why not abstain and vote for neither Tester or Sheehy?
Because I am a doer, not a by stander.
I know more about Sheehy and Zinke than most people do because of my significant involvement in trying to defend Held v Montana.
I witnessed how Party Boss forced Knudsen to purposely lose Held v Montana, and how Party Boss now controls Daines, Sheehy, and Zinke.
I supported Zinke since 2011 and helped him get elected. In November 2022, Zinke said he would invite me to talk to Congress about climate.
But Party Boss stopped Zinke from inviting me and Zinke will no longer talk to me. Zinke is now a puppet.
Knudsen rolled a bomb into the patriot’s tent. Daines, Sheehy, and Zinke support that action.
I gave Zinke and Sheehy months to accept my several invitations to spend an hour with me anytime anywhere to talk about climate. They refused to even reply to my invitations.
Somebody’s got to tell the people the truth.
I will take an incompetent over a traitor any day.
I understand your decision to not vote for Sheehy. However, I could never vote for a Democrat. Their agenda is diabolical. I would leave the Senate box blank. There are Republicans in my state who are similar to Sheehy, like our Governor Lee. It seems you have to have a lot of money to be a Governor in Tennessee. Lamar Alexander was a good Governor and Senator for a while, then in his later years he turned RINO and diabolical like Sheehy.
Dr. Berry,
I am hugely disappointed that you would vote for two Democrats in this election. Your reasoning is misguided. You are willing to keep in office a Senator who is as far left as they come, a supporter of the green new deal. Why? Because you feel that the Republicans are “RATS” on this one issue? Ok, they are wrong on the suit. I get that, but to vote for two people who would be wrong on every issue that would affect Montana and the country would not be wise. That’s tantamount to slicing off your nose to spite your face. You should rethink your stance.
Dear Immortal600,
By the way, are you the “real” Immortal600 or the fake?
Anyway, my decision goes beyond simple differences of opinions on climate change. I can live with differences of opinion.
My decision is based on the following:
1. Party Boss who assists WEF forced our AG to purposely lose HvM.
2. Party Boss also had the State of Montana censor and blacklist me personally to prevent me from helping Montana defeat HvM.
3. Party Boss forced Zinke to censor me personally and professionally.
4. Party Boss forced Daines, Sheehy, and Gianforte to support AG’s purposeful loss of HvM.
5. Now, they all support WEF’s goal of making us slaves by 2030.
6. Sheehy can’t even remember his own history and his real history does not look good. See Tim Sheehy violates Naval Honor Code.
7. WEF is my enemy, not my friend,
8. I can’t vote for anyone who censors me and purposely trashes the climate truth that I stand for.
7. This looks like a conspiracy to me, and I consider Sheehy and Zinke traitors.
8. I would rather live under a normal slimy Democrat than under a Republican who is a traitor who supports WEF.
The problem, Dr. Ed, the Senate is the key to Presidential appointments. We need Trump to win and take control of the Senate to replace Thomas and Alito when they retire. If they get replaced by two leftists we are toast.
Dear Stephan,
By their works, not words, we will know them. Sheehy and Zinke are leftists.
Sheehy’s company website before he decided to run for Senate, was all about leftist ideology.
Zinke has been a leftist science 2011 when he drove a Prius.
Sheehy and Zinke support the disastrous, purposeful loss of Held v Montana. That means they are leftists.
They support climate fiction and censor climate truth. That means they are leftists.
They do not deserve the “R” they claim to be. They are traitors and Trojan horses.
They refuse to recognize climate truth which we need to fight WEF.
They are agents of WEF.
Your argument that the group is more important than the individual is collectivism, which is the basis of communism, world government, and the World Economic Forum.
Our constitution is about the individual, not the collective.
Our schools teach collectivism supersedes individuality to indoctrinate students to support world government.
Collectivism also wants to erase history, like Montana’s purposeful loss of Held v Montana.
They say, “HvM is water over the bridge. Live with it.” That means living with perpetual fiction, and allowing that fiction to become the basis of future decisions.
My decision that Tester and Tranel are better for Montana than Sheehy and Zinke is based on facts, not opinion.
I think a common Democrat is preferable to a Republican traitor. I don’t trust that traitors will not cast the final vote to give WEF control of America.
Also, Daines and Zinke promoted Sheehy to block Matt Rosendale because Matt was in their way to let WEF control America. Why did they interfere, and get Trump to interfere, with Montana’s primary election?
It’s always about control. Daines and Zinke put their control above truth and justice. That’s why I don’t trust them to make favorable decisions about my future.
Hi Ed,
Like you I am sometimes disappointed in Republicans and almost always disappointed in Democrats. But my strategy differs from yours.
I will vote against (or fail to vote for) a Republican if it makes no difference in the outcome. Here in Oregon, it typically makes no difference, because Republicans have been shut out of statewide offices for decades. So I am free to vote for the best man or woman.
But if the election is going to be close, I will consider the greater good and vote strategically. That may mean swallowing my anger at a particular Republican and voting for him/her, especially if it could make a huge difference, such as control of Congress or our legislature. Right now Republicans are in danger of losing all control of the Oregon legislature, such that Democrats can pass whatever tax measures they want. I cannot vote for that and will support my local Republican, even though I am not fond of him.
On the national level, we have a first term Republican Congresswoman who is running for reelection by straddling the fence on Global Warming and ‘renewable energy.’ She is playing the middle as hard as she can, despite several conversations with me. If her race were not close and the outcome possibly crucial for control of the House of Representatives, I might withhold support. I dislike the RINO strategy, because among other things, it does not work.
HOWEVER, I don’t want our next President (Donald Trump) to be impeached on his second day in office, because Democrats have regained the House. So, I avoid hurting her campaign. If she is reelected, I will again suggest that she pay attention to the real science and stop her pandering.
I do not know the political situation in Montana. So I should not comment beyond suggesting that everyone vote strategically, even if you do not like the idiot on your side.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/authors/donald-j-trump/?origin=serp_auto
https://live.worldbank.org/en/experts/i/ivanka-trump?origin=serp_auto
Dr. Berry,
I am the REAL one who wrote the comment above. I appreciate your response. I bought your book and tout it to others.
I concur Immortal. Dr. Ed’s explanation of climate physics is beautifully simple. If it were complex, like the IPCC’s climate model, we would have been gone a long time ago and the planet would be barren.
TEWS_Pilot,
After watching Megan Kelly’s interview of Tim Sheehy I understand more fully why Dr. Ed will not vote for him. He couldn’t give a straight answer to a question. It is difficult to believe this guy is a Naval Academy graduate and former Navy Seal. He is the best Montana Republicans could offer? Really? I still would not vote for Tester but I concur with Dr. Ed, I would not vote for Sheehy. He is a swamp creature.
Ed, the country is now divided. The ONLY choices left are EVIL or GOOD. Democrats and RINOs are EVIL. Republicans who still hold to the basic principles and MAGA Republicans in particular are the last hope to save the country. Whichever party controls Congress and the White House will set the ENTIRE agenda and either destroy the country or restore the Republic, including “Climate Change” legislation vs “Climate REALISM,” and if the Democrats win, they will go full throttle on EVIL and the GREEN SCAMS, including Tester and any other Democrat who knows his vote is covered by other Democrats, so he can pretend to be against “Climate Change” legislation knowing there are enough Democrats to void his vote.
Voting to allow the Republicans to control Congress and the White House is NOT “Collectivism,” is it SURVIVAL. It is choosing GOOD over EVIL. No candidate is perfect, but Democrats are in lockstep with EVIL. If you choose to vote for a Democrat over ONE ISSUE, then you are voting for the EVIL Party to set ALL of the agenda. That is your choice, but at least admit that you don’t care about all of the other issues that will determine the fate of the nation for the next several generations. If the Democrats maintain control of the government, we will never have another actual election, they will all be like in third world dictatorships with ONE PARTY RULE. The UNIPARTY will lock in their power forever with a voting block of over 20 MILLION new citizens imported and naturalized from all over the world. If you care about your children and grandchildren and everyone else’s, do NOT vote for ANY Democrats. Either vote Republican or please abstain.
Dear TEWS_Pilot,
Thank you for your comment. My rating of these four candidates is based on my personal experience. I don’t expect you to agree with me, but that is OK.
What I know is that I have seen the hidden face of evil in Montana’s Republican Party, and it is more evil than I would have ever imagined. This does not apply to the whole Republican Party in Montana.
I measure evil on facts and observations, not feelings. The purposeful loss of HvM was the biggest political evil I have seen. That is why I cannot vote for Sheehy or Zinke or Knudsen.
In my opinion, Sheehy and Zinke are Democrats, not Republicans.
In my 65 years I’ve witnessed the USA D.C. government become corrupt, lazy, greedy, and finally – evil. Because people like me let it happen. We sat on the sidelines rather than getting in the ring.
Trump is getting in the ring – again. I think we, the people who allowed D.C. to rot, owe Trump a little gratitude, and a little help, with our vote.
Good for you Dr Ed.
It’s your right and free choice.
You don’t need to justify to anyone.
Good for you Dr Ed.
It’s your right and free choice.
You don’t need to justify to anyone.
Correcting e-mail address on previous post