Valerie (on the trapeze) and I are sailing US 7485 a minute after the start of one of 5 races where we won the US National Championship in Austin, Texas, in 1975.
Ed Berry, PhD, Physics
As of September 1, 2020, Republican leaders in Washington admit they are losing. They say so in their emails. While Trump has closed on Biden’s lead, a Republican victory is far from assured.
The latest poll has Democrats LEADING, meaning that if the Election were held today, we’d LOSE our Senate Majority. – Mitch McConnell, September 5, 2020.
New reports have emerged revealing that Democrats are majorly outraising conservatives by MILLIONS — making the possibility of a liberal takeover of our states EXTREMELY LIKELY. – Trump’s State Majorities, September 5, 2020.
A liberal takeover isn’t inevitable – but it becomes more likely every day… If Schumer takes control of the Senate, he and Nancy Pelosi will have the Majorities they need to implement radical policies like The Green New Deal, socialized health care and open borders – oh and they’ll pay for all of it by taxing YOU. – Newt Gingrich, September 5, 2020
If Republicans lose in November, they will take down the hopes and dreams of good people in all free countries of the world. And you can kiss your economic and intellectual freedom goodbye.
Plus, the Democrat-socialist world is sure to bring much higher taxes, gun confiscations, and forced vaccinations. Your best hope then is to elect Republicans for governor and all other political offices.
I support President Trump and all Republicans. However, I think they may lose in 2020, unless they challenge the Climate Change Fraud.
“But Republicans will win on law and order.” – No, because Democrats see their lawlessness as a just means to achieve their end.
“But Republicans will win on economy and morality.” – No, because Democrats now have more rabid votes for socialism.
“But Republicans will win because they are enthusiastic.” – No, because enthusiasm does not vote. People vote.
How Republicans lost the demographic war.
In 2016, Trump won Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin by a combined 77,000 votes.
Every day since America elected President Trump, another 10,000 students, brainwashed to vote Democrat, became eligible to vote. Meanwhile, millions of older Trump voters have died.
That demographic change gives the Democrats 15 million new voters in 2020. Distribute these 15 million new voters among the states according to a state’s electoral votes and Democrats can win every key state in the 2020 election.
Republicans ignored the climate issue.
Republicans thought the polls where climate took tenth place meant they could ignore the climate issue. Republicans thereby allowed the Democrats to use climate change to get more votes.
Republicans let the Democrats control education. This let the Democrats indoctrinate the Generation Z’s (those born after 1996) to believe (unscientifically) that human CO2 causes dangerous climate change. “Z” is for Zombies.
The Democrats used climate change to scare the Gen Z’s into voting Democrat to save the Planet. When you scare people into a belief, that belief controls how they think, how they act, and how they vote.
No one told the Gen Z’s that human CO2 is NOT the primary cause of CO2 increase. Recent polls of the Gen Z’s show the Democrat’s success. An overwhelming 83 percent of the Gen Z’s believe human CO2 causes dangerous climate change. Only 15 percent have no opinion. And 2 percent reject the Democrat’s version of climate change.
Congratulations Republicans. You let the Democrats get 83 percent of the Gen Z vote and you get only 2 percent.
Because Republicans ignored the climate issue, more Republicans now believe the Democrats are correct about climate. In 2020, a full 73 percent of America’s voters now believe the Democrats on climate change. The “squishy” Republicans think they must compromise with the Democrats on climate.
You can’t compromise on truth. That is how to lose the election. Republicans will get more votes if they stand firm for climate truth.
The Republican refusal to take a strong position on climate truth is why the Democrats won the House in 2018 and why they could win the presidency, senate, and house in 2020.
The Democrat’s “climate science” is a house of cards built on a foundation of sand.
The IPCC (United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) formalizes the Democrat’s “core theory” of climate change. They claim:
The level of natural CO2 in the atmosphere has remained at 280 ppm. Therefore, they conclude human CO2 caused all the CO2 increase above 280 ppm.
That “core theory” is the Democrat’s “climate science” foundation of sand.
True science now proves the Democrat’s “climate science” foundation is wrong. This means everything the Democrats claim about climate is wrong because everything they claim is based upon their foundation.
The Democrat’s house of cards has collapsed. To understand why, we must understand the scientific method.
Voters do not understand the scientific method. The Democrats never taught the Gen Z’s the scientific method. The voters think, incorrectly, that the side that has the most published papers and the most government, media, and professional support wins. But votes do not determine truth.
Albert Einstein described the scientific method. He said many experiments may prove him right, but it takes only one experiment to prove him wrong. That means it takes only one proof that a scientific theory is wrong to overpower all the evidence used to claim the theory is true.
Preprint #3 topples the IPCC-Democrat core theory of climate change.
My Preprint #3 follows the scientific method to prove decisively that the IPCC-Democrat core theory of climate change is wrong. IPCC’s science error is not in some minute calculation. Their error is in fundamental science. Stuff they should have learned in college.
My Preprint #3 is on my website. Top climate scientists worldwide have thoroughly reviewed and approved it. No scientist has found any error in its proof the IPCC-Democrat core theory of climate change is invalid.
Here are some comments by scientists:
Ed’s paper “quantifies the anthropogenic and natural contributions to changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration without need for knowledge of rate constants for individual mechanisms. This is a breakthrough in understanding which [other scientists] including myself all failed to make.” – Dr. Richard Courtney
“A proper model must address all CO2 in the atmosphere at once, without discrimination. You do that magnificently from first principles.” – Dr. Gordon Fulks
“Ed does not make mathematical mistakes in solving his rate equations.” – Dr. William Happer
“Dear Ed, Congratulations – a wonderful piece of work.” – Dr. Nils-Axel Morner
What does the failure of IPCC’s core theory mean to politics?
The demise of IPCC’s core theory makes all IPCC’s climate reports, climate models, and thousands of peer-reviewed scientific papers invalid because all these incorrectly assume IPCC’s core theory is true to derive their conclusions. Garbage in, garbage out.
All laws and all court rulings that assumed IPCC’s core theory was true are invalid. California’s AB 32, for example, has no science to justify its existence.
IPCC’s so-called 97 percent consensus – if it ever existed – is over. Their whole climate game is over because they now have no valid operating core theory of climate change.
“Don’t melting glaciers, rising sea levels, more hurricanes, species dying, floods, droughts, etc., prove human CO2 causes climate change?” No, events do not prove their cause.
What is the cause of a head ache or a stomach ache? Obviously, an effect does prove what caused it. If effects proved their cause, doctors would not have to diagnose an effect to find the cause.
Climate treaties and climate laws are useless because they cannot control nature.
What is the truth about climate change?
Data show the natural CO2 level was much higher than 280 ppm before and after 1750. So, natural CO2 in the atmosphere did not remain at 280 ppm as the IPCC claims.
Calculations with IPCC’s own data show, as of 2020, natural CO2 caused 75 percent of the increase above 280 ppm and human CO2 caused 25 percent. That is a long way from IPCC’s claim that human CO2 caused ALL the increase. And it changes the whole climate picture.
IPCC-Democrats claim human CO2 stays in the atmosphere for thousands of years while natural CO2 flows freely out of the atmosphere. This IPCC-Democrat claim is as anti-science as anyone can get.
Human and natural CO2 molecules are identical. Therefore, human and natural CO2 obey the same natural laws. Human CO2 flows out of the atmosphere as natural CO2 flows out of the atmosphere. Human CO2 does not stay in the atmosphere for thousands of years. Human CO2 is not a threat to the planet.
(This conclusion is an application of the Equivalence Principle of physics. Einstein used the Equivalence Principle to derive his General Theory of Relativity.)
Calculations using IPCC’s own data show if all human CO2 emissions were to stop in 2020, the human-caused increase would fall from 33 ppm in 2020, to 10 ppm by 2100, and to 5 ppm by 2200.
What if the natural CO2 level had stayed constant at 280 ppm as Democrat’s claim?
Then human emissions would have increased the CO2 level from 280 ppm to only 313 ppm. Even the Democrats admit that 313 ppm is of no consequence to climate change. So, the Democrats have no case for climate change.
What have the Republicans missed?
Put simply, Democrats have convinced voters that “Democrats represent true science and Republicans represent anti-science.” That view is incorrect but that is the prevailing public perception.
Voters want to be on the side of “true science.” Republicans have not challenged the Democrats on climate science. Therefore, the Republicans let the Democrats win the science issue by default.
Republicans argue that economy is more important than climate, which is true. But that argument admits the Democrats are correct on science, e.g., “IPCC’s core theory is true.” So, it helps Democrats get more votes.
Similarly, the argument that “warm is better than cold” is also true. But it also admits the Democrats are correct on climate science. So, it helps Democrats get more votes.
The Democrat’s climate politics breeds socialism. Democrats have convinced voters that only socialism and a world government can save the planet from a climate disaster. They have convinced the voters that socialism is necessary to save the world from the Republican conservative monsters.
The Democrat platform and candidates put the climate issue at the top of their concerns. The Republican platform and candidates do not even mention the climate issue. In politics, if you don’t fight, you lose.
Democrat climate voters are not fazed by the “Black Lives Matter” riots. Dedicated Democrats believe the end justifies the means. And their end goal is socialism and world government.
And socialism it will be unless Republicans do something to stop this threat … FAST.
How Republicans can win.
Some Republican leaders say, “I think Trump will win by a landslide.” Therefore, they think they can ignore the climate issue.
Such thinking on the part of leaders is irresponsible. What they “think” is not a valid basis for Republican policy because what they “think” may be wrong. No one knows how well President Trump will do in the 2020 election. He could, if the stars are properly aligned, win big time. He could also lose big time.
Here is what US Senator Mitch McConnell wrote:
With less than two months to go until Election Day, things aren’t looking good. Democrats are outraising Republicans in nearly a DOZEN battleground states, and, if that weren’t bad enough, they’re leading in the polls too, putting the future of our Republican Senate Majority in JEOPARDY.
Just 4 seats will determine control of the Senate, Fellow Conservative. Every contribution – no matter how big or small – will help us make sure that we protect these critical seats and DEFEND our conservative agenda.
– Mitch McConnell, September 7, 2020.
Does McConnell’s statement imply Republicans should ignore an issue that could win their elections?
More money is just one way to get more votes. But if voters are already decided, and there is no new issue to change their minds, more money will not carve out a win for Republicans. Republicans must do something else to change the polls. There is only one new issue that will get Republicans significantly more votes: Climate Truth.
To get significantly more votes, Republicans must change how the voters think about climate. If Republicans tell the people the truth about climate, they will win the 2020 elections, save the Republican Party, and save the world.
Republicans will not lose any votes by standing up for climate truth. They will likely gain 10 percent, which is enough to turn an election disaster into an overwhelming victory.
Voters want true science. Show voters you represent true science and you will get their votes.
No one has told President Trump he is correct on climate. No one! Why?
Isn’t it the responsibility of elected Republicans to tell the President?
President Trump tweeted on July 10, 2020:
“Too many Universities and School Systems are about Radical Left Indoctrination, not Education. Therefore, I am telling the Treasury Department to re-examine their Tax-Exempt Status and/or Funding, which will be taken away if this Propaganda or Act Against Public Policy continues. Our children must be Educated, not Indoctrinated!”
President Trump nailed it.
Scientists, teachers, and professors should have found IPCC’s fundamental scientific error. It is not that complicated. Instead, they lied to the public and indoctrinated their students on junk climate science.
Now, President Trump faces a problem like President Herbert Hoover faced in 1928 – a demographic change years in the making. President Hoover had no chance to beat FDR because of a demographic change. And when he lost, there was not another Republican president for 24 years.
The stakes are high in 2020.
If President Trump loses in 2020, it will end Republican control of the presidency and congress for a very long time. Maybe forever, because Democrats will flood America with immigrants to assure they control America forever, and they could hold a Constitutional Convention and change our Constitution to give them more power.
If Republicans lose the presidency and congress in 2020, they will be like Christians in China. Powerless and hunted.
Is that not reason enough to take a strong stand for climate truth?
President Trump must lead Republicans to declare the Democrat’s core theory of climate change is a scientific fraud of the highest order. That declaration will make the news. And it will open the door to explain why, in very simple term, why the Democrats are wrong about climate and science.
Climate truth makes President Trump the most pro-science president in recent history. The New York Times will not tell you that. So, Republicans must tell the people.
Who is going to tell President Trump he can win on the climate issue?
How Republicans can benefit from climate truth:
- Prove President Trump is correct on climate. (His advisors did not tell him this.)
- Show voters that Republicans support real science.
- Swing 10 percent of voters from Democrat to Republican before the election.
Democrats are guilty of climate malpractice. Republicans can demonstrate to the voters, the media, and the law that the Democrat represent anti-science and Republicans represent true science.
The Democrat climate claims as real as the Wizard of Oz. Republicans, like Toto, can pull back the curtain so everyone can see the Democrat’s fraudulent climate wizard.
Democrats wasted a half trillion America dollars on their false climate science.
The Democrat-IPCC climate fraud is the biggest fraud ever played upon the human population. The IPCC and its supporters have lost their scientific credibility. They failed the major climate science project in history.
They cost you money. They disrupt your economy. They damage your environment with their useless wind energy facilities. They block your access to low-cost reliable energy. They harm America’s national defense.
Perhaps most damaging of all, they distort your mind. They force you to believe your CO2 emissions damage the planet. They force you to do penance for your “environmental” sins. They force you to believe their alarmism – which is the polar-opposite of true science.
Republicans have two choices:
- They can ignore climate science and hope a November miracle will save them. Or,
- They can challenge the Democrats on climate and get at least 10 percent more votes.
If Republicans ignore climate science, they may lose the presidency, the senate, and the house.
If Republicans challenge the Democrats on climate FAST, they will get enough votes to assure they win.
If you want to preserve your American freedom, you had better fight smart now. Because if the Democrats win the presidency, the Senate, and the House in 2020, they are going to make the lives of conservatives living hell. They have openly promised as much.
Will Republicans be wimps or warriors?
What matters is not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog.