by Edwin X Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM H(1) is the hypothesis that human CO2 emissions cause all the CO2 increase. H(1) is the core assumption of all climate alarmism, laws, taxes, grants, and incentives. I and other scientists have published peer-reviewed papers that prove H(1) is false. The CO2 Coalition and DOE report scientists […]
by Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM Trump needs a climate team that has published proof that human CO2 is insignificant. The good scientists who have published proofs that human CO2 is insignificant, I call “my team.” My team is the only team that can defeat the Lighthiser v Trump climate lawsuit. By contrast, the
by Edwin X Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM DOE’s action to remove the Endangerment Finding is a good move. But If Trump uses the DOE team as expert witnesses to defend Lighthiser v Trump, he will lose LvT, which will overturn Trump’s EO’s on energy and climate, and return a new Endangerment Finding. To defeat
I highlighted the parts I think are critical. The whole lawsuit depends upon climate assumptions.
Montana and 18 States filed to do an Intervention that is doomed to fail. The only, way to defeat this lawsuit is to prove its climate assumtions are wrong. Knudsen censored Dr. Ed Berry and refused to talk to Berry’s climate team who would have EASILY defeated Held v Montana. The LvT lawsuit is not
