1. I sent a link to Happers article to my CO2 consensus accepting friend. He was somewhat appalled by the last sentence. I haven't got around to asking him his advice for how to respond to unwarranted personal attacks. I have observed in my life that ignoring the attack is very often the best response and revenge is almost never productive.

    I do hope Trump appoints Will as science advisor-such a stark difference from Holdren.

  2. No published or accepted paper yet, Ed?

    Still censoring comments showing Happer is wrong?

    I've noticed that, sooner or later, all denier blogs censor information and censor people.

    It's the only way they can keep denying the science. Shameful.

  3. Ed has so little confidence in Happer's science that he refuses to publishing dissenting views.

    Then, out of the other side of his mouth, he'll complain that deniers are censored.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.