Ed Berry, PhD, physics, CCM
They claim President Trump is “anti-science.”
President Trump is the most pro-science president for decades and the Democrats are the most anti-science party for a very long time. To make America great, we need smart people.
One big reason to reelect President Trump is to save and rebuild America’s science and sanity.
Let’s make the climate argument as simple as possible with an analogy.
A person’s death can have many effects – on family, on business, maybe even on politics. But no rational person would conclude the effects of a person’s death determine the cause of the person’s death.
Yet, that is how most humans think about climate change.
All climate alarmists think, incorrectly, that their claimed effects of climate change – shrinking glaciers, rising seas, loss of species, even ulcers – prove our human CO2 causes the climate change.
There are two kinds of climate scientists. The effects scientists claim climate change will kill us all in 100 years and it’s your fault. They are not climate experts. They lie to you.
The cause scientists conclude nature, not human CO2, causes climate change.
Climate alarmists are trapped inside the BORG.
In Star Trek, the BORG caught some unfortunate space travelers. Resistance is futile.
In America, the Climate BORG caught the climate alarmists. Sleepy Joe is asleep in the Climate BORG. If America elects him, the BORG will change the voting rules, the laws, and the demographics to be sure they rule America forever. If the Climate BORG wins, it will control you.
There is a fork in the road ahead.
The Trump road will build up America. The Biden road will tear down America.
Choose your road. What matters is the world you will live in if we don’t reelect President Trump.
Here’s one big problem.
Seventy percent of American voters and 100 percent of young voters believe the Democrats are correct on climate … because Republicans have done nothing to courter that belief.
Combine that with Republicans’ second problem. In the last four years, the number of young, liberal, socialist voters has increased while older conservative Trump voters have died off.
Republicans have a demographics problem that money alone won’t solve.
How to solve this one big problem.
The belief in liberal socialism is connected one-on-one with the belief in the climate myth. Destroy the climate myth and you will change enough votes to reelect President Trump on this issue alone.
All climate alarmist claims are based on the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) core theory that says:
Human CO2 caused all the CO2 increase since 1750, or above 280 ppm, while natural CO2 emissions stayed constant.
We can use IPCC’s own data to prove IPCC’s core theory is wrong.
The physics argument uses IPCC’s carbon cycles. Carbon cycles show how carbon flows between the four major carbon reservoirs: land, atmosphere, surface ocean, and deep ocean. There is a human carbon cycle and a natural carbon cycle.
IPCC assumes human carbon obeys different physics than natural carbon. Of course, this is impossible because human and natural CO2 molecules are identical. IPCC uses dumb scientists.
Therefore, IPCC needs, but does not know it needs, a “demon” in the atmosphere that can separate human CO2 molecules from natural CO2 molecules. Their climate argument looks like this:
The circles represent the carbon cycles. IPCC’s demon finds human CO2 molecules and sends them to a fictitious human carbon cycle that is different from IPCC’s natural carbon cycle.
Viola, IPCC claims human carbon stays in the atmosphere much longer than natural carbon stays in the atmosphere and climate alarmists claim human CO2 causes a climate crisis.
But IPCC proves itself wrong because it disobeys the physics Equivalence Principle, which says when we cannot measure a difference between two things, these two things are identical. Human and natural CO2 molecules are identical. Therefore, they will follow the same physics.
Therefore, IPCC’s core theory is false. Checkmate!
Also, all peer-reviewed scientific papers that assume IPCC’s core theory is true, are now invalid and cannot be used to support IPCC’s core theory.
No human CO2 stays in the atmosphere forever. Human CO2 flows out of the atmosphere like natural CO2 flows out of the atmosphere. There is no climate emergency and no climate crisis.
How this problem began.
Teachers and professors lied to themselves and to their students. Major media lied to everyone. President Trump’s science advisors lied to the President. Republicans, as a group, let it happen.
They brainwashed the young people on climate using the outlawed “Joe Camel” tactics of “Let’s all smoke together.”
President Trump is among the very few who figured out there is something wrong with IPCC’s climate claims. He nailed it but he doesn’t know it. We need to reelect this president.
President Trump tweeted correctly:
“Too many Universities and School Systems are about Radical Left Indoctrination, not Education. Therefore, I am telling the Treasury Department to re-examine their Tax-Exempt Status and/or Funding, which will be taken away if this Propaganda or Act Against Public Policy continues. Our children must be Educated, not Indoctrinated!”
Our radical left teachers and professors have been indoctrinating their students on climate and socialism for decades. That is why Republicans have a problem in 2020.
Elect Republican governors.
Governors appoint the Board of Regents for state universities. The Board of Regents approve the policies and the staff. Tell your Republican governor to appoint Regents who will stop the climate and socialist agendas in your universities. Montana universities reek with radical left indoctrination.
How you can help reelect President Trump.
Be a climate warrior and stop the climate fraud.
You can stop the climate fraud without having a physics PhD. You don’t need an MD degree to understand basic health and fitness.
Here’s our plan. I am gearing up to teach you online how to be a climate warrior.
While I am preparing to teach you, you can spread the word. Tell your friends and social media about this. Tell them to go to https://edberry.com and sign up on my email list to get notified.
I will teach you stuff that many PhD’s have never learned. With this simple stuff, you will slay them.
Working together, we will slay enough Democrat votes to save America.
More in my next letter.
Even hamburger flippers are climate scientist these days.
Burger King addresses climate change by changing cows’ diets
Michelle Chapman, The Associated Press, at 12:07 on July 14, 2020
Burger King is staging an intervention with its cows.
The chain has rebalanced the diet of some of the cows by adding lemon grass in a bid to limit bovine contributions to climate change. By tweaking their diet, Burger King said Tuesday that it believes it can reduce a cow’s daily methane emissions by about 33%.
Cows emit methane as a by-product of their digestion, and that has become a potential public relations hurdle for major burger chains.
Greenhouse gas emissions from the agriculture sector made up 9.9% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2018, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Of that amount, methane emissions from livestock (called enteric fermentation) comprised more than a quarter of the emissions from the agriculture sector.
With an over-the-top social media campaig n that teeters between vulgarity and science (sprinkled with more vulgarity), Burger King is banking on the heightened awareness of climate change and its responsibility to limit its own role.
According to a recent poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, about two out of three Americans say corporations have a responsibility to combat climate change. The gravitational pull of climate change is increasingly finding its way onto national political stage.
Potential customers are also cutting down on the amount of meat they consume, citing both environmental and dietary concerns. Burger King and rival McDonald’s have added meat alternatives to their menus.
Two years ago McDonald’s said it was taking steps to cut the greenhouse gases it emits. It tweaked the manner in which the beef in its Big Macs and Quarter Pounders was produced. The company said at the time that it expected the changes to prevent 150 million metric tons (165 million tons) of greenhouse gas emissions from being released into the atmosphere by 2030.
Burger King worked with scientists at the Autonomous University at the State of Mexico and at the University of California, Davis to test and develop its formula of adding 100 grams of lemongrass leaves to the cows’ daily diets. Preliminary tests indicate that the lemongrass leaves help the cows release less methane as they digest their food.
On Tuesday, Burger King introduced its Reduced Methane Emissions Beef Whopper, made with beef sourced from cows that emit reduced methane, in select restaurants in Miami, New York, Austin, Portland and Los Angeles, while supplies last.
I’m cutting down on Burger King burgers… to zero. Carl’s Jr. is better anyway, and they don’t pander to the climate crazies.
Cows eat *pounds* of grass or grain per day… adding a mere 100 grams of lemongrass leaves to their diet won’t have an appreciable effect. 150 million metric tons of methane sounds like an awful lot, doesn’t it? Except it’s not… it’s a drop in the bucket, considering that it’s over 10 years.
150 million metric tons is less than landfills produce in one year… we must close all landfills and force people to eat their own trash! That’s as much as wetlands produce in a single year… we must eradicate all wetlands! That’s as much as termites produce in 2 years… we must embark upon a worldwide and very expensive campaign to destroy all termites! That’s as much as the world’s oceans produce in 2 1/2 years… we must drain the oceans!
As usual, the climate crazies have no sense of scale.
Besides, barbed-wire grass (aka fevergrass, aka lemongrass) *relaxes* the abdominal muscles, allowing the *release* of gas…
“Lemongrass promotes good digestion and brings relief from diarrhea, bloating, nausea, stomach ache and gastroenteritis. It allows the abdominal muscles to relax and release gas.”
On top of that, methane’s absorption spectrum is swamped by water vapor:
“The ratio of the percentages of water to methane is such that the effects of CH4 are completely masked by H2O. The amount of CH4 must increase 100-fold to make it comparable to H2O.”
And to top it all off, methane breaks down very quickly when exposed to sunshine… OH- radicals break it down into CO2 and H2O.
“The hydroxyl (OH) radical, a molecule made up of one hydrogen atom, one oxygen atom with a free (or unpaired) electron, is one of the most reactive gases in the atmosphere and regularly breaks down other gases, effectively ending their lifetimes. In this way, OH is the main check on the concentration of methane”
As usual, the climate crazies have no scientific basis for their blather.
Mr Ed Berry, pHD
I totally agree with the need to re-elect President Trump.
I totally agree that Republicans, not having an answer to “global warming”, will face defeat.
I totally agree we must reach our Republican leaders to help them understand global warming – BUT I HAVE GOTTEN KICKED IN THE SHINS BY THEM; “You do not know how politics works – I have taken your name off my email list”
Mr Berry – may I humbly suggest you contact me about the fourth source of energy – Mr Robert Tuttle’s book – AND THE CAUSE OF THE GLOBAL WARMING THAT ENDED IN 2005, AND THE COASTING TILL 2020. WE ARE NOW COOLING OFF!!!!!
Using NOAA’s global [hot spot] temperature map it is very easy to see what caused the warming that occurred after 1980 until 2005.
Their latest map shows the hot spots are gone [except one in Siberia]. We are entering an ice age – THE PROOF IS THERE.
CAN YOU ADD THIS SCIENCE TO YOUR TEACHING PLAN???
TIME MAGAZINE’S latest has 45 pages of “ONE LAST CHANCE” to save the planet.
NEVER UNDERESTIMATE STUPIDITY. ALL WRONG !!!!!
I am a registered Chemical and Mechanical Engineer – not given to following people who are “never in doubt but often wrong” [ like my father]
I will be writing a new chapter on this source of energy next week, and will send you a draft – but only if you respond to this email.
I do not want to take energy away from re-electing Trump.
IPCC mandate of human caused warming.
Just what would you expect from an organization whose mandate is this?
1. Scope and Approach of the Assessment 1.1. Mandate of the Assessment
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established by World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) in 1988 to assess scientific, technical, and socioeconomic information that is relevant in understanding HUMAN-INDUCED [my emphases] climate change, its potential impacts, and options for mitigation and adaptation.
The rational voter is trapped between a rock and a hard place:
Opportunistic stupidity v.s. the feckless GOP.
Republicans had numerous opportunities to step up to the plate,
but they allowed all to pass. Climate, energy, and the EPA’s
Endangerment Finding are perhaps the most glaring example.
But it’s hardly unique. Now the GOP is confronted with bigger issues.
Too many arose from its anemic drive and legislative impotence.
The only hope of a long term solution is to gradually replace
entrenched Republicans with populist alternatives,
endorsed by the likes of Trump. Alabama may be a signal.
Until then, the GOP will continue its well established role –
waiting for the next left wing threat.
The problem that is faced is not proving the science it is being given the opportunity to prove it to the masses. Unfortunately, at present, the mainstream media, which is liberal/ left leaning, is firmly against allowing access to their programmes to educate on this subject as they say `mantra like` that “the science is settled” or “there is a consensus”… The only way the masses will get on board with rejecting the alarmist rubbish is to somehow gain access to the TV to discuss and debate !!!
If I may add it, ordinary citizens can participate in a facet of the global warming issue that doesn’t require any kind of climate science expertise, by questioning whether the accusation that skeptic climate scientists are on the payroll of Big Oil to spread lies actually has any viable evidence to back it up. The accusation appears in the literally days-old Minnesota v American Petroleum Institute, ExxonMobil lawsuit. I posit that when any objective examiner dives deeply enough into the accusation, no matter how it is approached, the accusation falls apart and always leads back to the same core clique of enviro-activists who’ve been pushing this worthless accusation for the last 20+ years. For more on that, please see my dissection of the MN v API case here: http://gelbspanfiles.com/?p=10334 (apologies in advance for all the additional reading there resulting from my links within my blog post)