Why Climate Freedom X

Edwin X Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics, CCM

“It’s about Climate Truth and your Freedom, Kid.”

You need a freedom alternative to the big kid on the block because the big kid is going to make you a slave. We are the alternative.

(By the way, I am updating this text as you read it. I am not finished yet, but you can watch this as we progress.)

The Lighthiser v Trump climate lawsuit is the biggest threat to Trump’s climate plans for America and the free world.

When the Lighthiser v Trump judge hammers the last bang of the trial, all Trump’s chances to argue for climate truth and freedom will end, maybe permanently.

The court will then decide, based upon the evidence presented in court, whether our human CO2 emission do or do not cause dangerous climate change.

If the CO2 Coalition, the big kid on the block, defends LvT, the plaintiffs will win because the defense will not present sufficient evidence that the plaintiffs’ climate claims were wrong.

Here’s how we differ from the CO2 Coalition:

First, we know how to defeat a climate lawsuit. They don’t.

They think they can win by waxing poetic about how climate works. But that will lose the defense.

We understand the only way to defeat the plaintiffs is to prove their core hypotheses are wrong.

We summarize the plaintiffs’ hypotheses as H(1), H(2), H(3) and H(4):

1. Human CO2 emissions cause the CO2 increase.
2. This CO2 increase causes global warming.
3. This global warming causes bad stuff to happen.
4. The bad stuff in H(3) proves H(1) and H(2) are true.

The best and only way to defeat LvT is to prove in court that these four hypotheses are false.

Climate Freedom X is the only climate group whose scientists who have proved all four hypotheses are false.

By contrast, the CO2 Coalition scientists AGREE with the plaintiffs that H(1) and H(2) are true and that H(3) causes global warming. They use the “Casey at the Bat” strategy. They take the first two strikes and hope they hit a home run on the third pitch. We all know what happened to Casey.

The plaintiffs unknowingly add H(4) in their arguments. We attack this a pure circular reasoning.

The CO2 Coalition scientists disagree with the plaintiffs’ claims on some of their claimed bad stuff, but they won’t be able to prove the child plaintiffs suffered no damage.

We can defeat Lighthiser v Trump. They can’t.

The CO2 Coalition scientists have disqualified themselves from being expert witnesses. Their DOE report and the CO2 Coalition publications show the CO2 Coalition agrees with H(1) and H(2) are true. The plaintiffs’ expert trial attorneys are already pouring over the DOE report and the CO2 Coalition website. They will eat the DOE’s and the CO2 Coalition’s science experts alive in the trial.

The CO2 Coalition has already disqualified themselves by promoting junk science.

The CO2 Coalition published a special document **** that promotes their junk science. They won’t even acknowledge their junk science errors. Their errors should not be accepted by any university.

Quote koonin, DOE, CO2C on H(1) and H(2).

Also, the open discussions of the DOE report revealed that two members of the DOE team believe the Earth is 6000 years old. Normally, that might not matter. But this trial has hundreds of billions, maybe trillions, of dollars at stake in the outcome. If Spencer and Christy are defense experts, the plaintiffs’ trial attorneys will use Spencer’s and Christy’s belief in a 6000-year-old Earth to challenge their scientific credibility.

The trial will end up in the US Supreme Court, just like Held v Montan ended up in the Montana Supreme Court. But the supreme court will not overturn the trial court’s decision because the decision will be based on the climate arguments presented in the trial.

We have defeated a major weather-related lawsuit. They have not.

I led the scientific defense team that defeated the California Attorney General’s team in their high-profile murder charge against Joe Hunt. Our defense used weather data and human physiology in to prove the plaintiffs’ assumptions were wrong. After five days on the witness stand, I convinced the jury that Joe Hunt was innocent of the murder charge. Microsoft awarded me with the People’s Choice Award in its Windows World Open Software Contest for the model I used in the trial.

Our defense against the California AG is a model for the best method to defeat LvT. Using that method, I can show the defense attorney how to defeat LvT. This information is critical because there are no expert defense attorneys for a climate lawsuit.

We understand systems models. They don’t.

We follow the standard

We follow the Climate Equivalence Principle. They don’t.

We follow the Climate Partition Principle. They don’t

We follow straight-forward simple climate truth. They don’t.

Trump is on course to chose the CO2 Coalition scientists to be his defense because he chose them to be the DOE climate group.

President Trump is organizing his defense of Lighthiser v Trump… and Trump does not have a clue that WEF has already organized a defense for him that is certain to lose LvT.

It’s not Trump’s’ business to know these things. WEF knows that. So, Trump is a sitting duck.

Trump is making a serious science mistake like the COVID mistake he made in his first term. He is relying on scientists connected with the government to make decisions for him.

Unless Trump gets realistic very soon, he will lose LvT. Then the LvT plaintiffs will quickly overturn Trump’s three Executive Orders on Energy and Climate and his executive order on golden science. The Democrats will deflate Trump’s power and devastate the whole free world. America will elect a Democrat president in 2028.

Part of my expertise is that I know exactly how to do that.

Why Montana?

The LvT attorneys filed in Montana and the action will be in Montana. The first LvT court action will be in Missoula, MT, on September 16 and 17, which is only a few weeks away. Missoula is only a two-hour drive for me.

Montana is where I can get support and hopefully publicity for our group.

Most scientists, like me, have expertise in one of these hypotheses. That’s why it takes a team to defeat a climate lawsuit.

We will never get publicity for our work in climate truth if we remain lone rangers. The only way to achieve our goal is to form a group that supports our efforts.

To date, there is no public group that supports climate truth. Therefore, the CO2 Coalition supports wild climate fiction without opposition, and our political leaders don’t know the difference. The CO2 Coalition argues that H(1) and H(2) are true, and they make only a very limited argument that H(3) is false. The plaintiffs’ attorneys will destroy the CO2 Coalition expert witnesses.

The DOE climate team and its climate report is a Trojan Horse designed put a losing defense team on Trump’s defense.

The DOE climate team, composed of members of the CO2 Coalition, is WEF’s preferred team to defend LvT because they will lose LvT.

Steve Koonin, a member of the CO2 Coalition, is an Obama man. The DOE report is the planned defense argument for Trump’s defense team. He is a big promoter of H(1).

The CO2 Coalition and the DOE climate team are doing exactly what the LvT attorneys would like them to do. The LvT attorneys are delineating every word of the DOE report and devising ways to make it support their offense.

This filing is a masterful diversion of focus. It makes the other AG’s think they are on Trump’s side when the truth is their action opposes Trump. Knudsen has no inerest or plan to defeat LvT. He has no phucking clue about how to defeat LvT and he does not care. He is filed this distraction because he is a WEF puppet.

Montana AG Knudsen, who purposely lost Held v Montana for WEF, filed an Intervention to LvT on July 8, 2025, with the AGs from 18 other states.

Because (a) WEF controls key Montana Republicans, (b) the plaintiffs’ attorneys are the same expert trial attorneys that won Held v Montana, and (c) so they could choose a favorable federal judge.

You may ask, why did the attorneys for Lighthiser v Trump file their lawsuit in a federal court in Montana?

The LvT plaintiffs are using the same experienced trial attorneys they used to win Held v Montana. They filed LvT in Montana with their chosen federal judge. There will be no opposition from high-level Montana elected officials because they are all bought and paid for.

Our task is urgent because if Trump loses LvT, our opportunity to promote climate truth to the world will expire.

To make that happen, we need to form a new group because there is no present scientific group that can help Trump win. We are getting nowhere with our emails to each other.

To avoid this disaster, Trump must immediately find a team of scientists who will defeat LvT.

Then the LvT plaintiffs will quickly overturn Trump’s three Executive Orders on Energy and Climate and his executive order on golden science. The Democrats will deflate Trump’s power and devastate the free world. And America will elect a Democrat president in 2028.

Unless Trump gets realistic very soon, he will lose LvT.

Trump is making a serious science mistake comparable to the COVID mistake he made in his first term. He is relying on scientists connected with the government and not really on his side to make decisions for him.

It’s not Trump’s’ business to know these things. WEF knows that. So, Trump is a sitting duck.

President Trump is organizing his defense of Lighthiser v Trump… but Trump does not have a clue that WEF has already organized a defense for him that is certain to lose LvT.

Held v Montana was a fraud trial that had no defense. Only a few insiders like me know what happened. The liberal press hides the truth because the key RINOs are working for WEF.

This Montana Republican told (not asked) Montana’s Attorney General Knudsen on Friday, June 3, 2022, between 1:00 pm and 2:00 pm, to delete me from his potential defense team because he knows I would have led Montana to prevail in Held v Montana, thereby upsetting WEF’s plans to control the world.

Montana Senator Daines lied when he claimed Montana lost because the judge was a liberal and therefore made the wrong decision. Wannabe Montana Senator Sheehy echoed the same lying claim. Montana Congressmen Zinke and Downing and Governor Gianforte support the same lying claim. Why? Because they are puppets of an influential Republican who works for the World Economic Forum and they all must stand together or their little secret will get out.

Montana lost Held v Montana because Montana purposely LOST the trial.

Now, nothing. I am not even set up yet to receive money for Climate Flow X, LLC. Later, I will request a small donation to cover my costs to provide this service.

What is the cost to join this group?

Please add a comment below that you want to be part of Climate Flow X. Tell me if you have talent and time to help with part of this new business. Tell me which of the three hypotheses is your focus.

If you support proofs that these three hypotheses are false, Climate Flow X is the place for you.

Comment below if you want to be part of Climate Flow X that will offer to LvT for President Trump.

Very soon, I will have a signup form on this page that will let you become a member of Climate Freedom X. The members will then be able to write to each other in the membership section.