Human CO2 has little effect on atmospheric CO2 Please see the published version of this paper here. Edwin X Berry, Ph.D., CCMClimate Physics LLC, Bigfork, Montana, USA “The formulation of a problem is often more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skill. To raise new questions, new […]
by Camille Veyres, Porto Conference 2018 Summary: (1) The amount of carbon dioxide in the air in a consequence of the surface temperatures of the intertropical zone where most of the outgassing takes place; it is a consequence (an integral over time) of past temperatures, and hence cannot cause the temperatures; 6% of the CO2
Global Green Airbag versus Global Greenhouse Claus U. Rieth, The Porto Climate Conference Basic Science of a Changing Climate – the topic of the Conference that took place at Porto University in Porto, Portugal on Sept, 07– 09, 2018. Attended by leading scientists in many domains, experts of engineering and critical thinkers of meteorology, oceanography,
by Dr. Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics NEWS Murry Salby was scheduled to speak on climate physics to faculty and students of the Helmut-Schmidt-University, Germany. But, the university president decided climate physics is too political. He would not allow Salby to speak without an opposing speaker. Murry Salby is the author of the excellent textbook, “Physics
These slides prove human CO2 emissions add only 18 ppm to CO2 in the atmosphere while nature adds 392 ppm. Therefore, everything the UN IPCC and its supporters have told you about climate change is WRONG! Human emissions do not change the climate. These are my Porto slides revised and expanded. Next, I will add video and text
For President Trump to continue his agenda, Republicans must control the Senate and Congress. But Republican candidates are in trouble inalmost every election for the Senate and Congress. Why? Something is missing in the Republican elections this yearand it may cause Republicans to lose the Senate and Congress. I believe what is missing is climate
Micheal Crichton describes the fundamental political problem of climate change: it is a religion promoted by nutcases who dismiss facts, logic, and science that contradicts their environmental belief. I have taken the liberty to bold some of his sentences to make his message more clear. – Ed by Michael Crichton Remarks to the Commonwealth Club,
by Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics On September 7, I will present a summary of my climate research to scientists at the international climate conference, “Basic Science of a Changing Climate,” at Porto University, Portugal. On September 11, I will present the same talk but slower to a public audience in Kalispell, Montana. Roger Roots, J.D., Ph.D.,
“The simple model shows how inflow affects level, how level affects outflow, and how balance occurs when outflow equals inflow. Nothing in the world outside the atmosphere changes these conclusions. But these conclusions change entirely the dominant worldview of how human emissions change the level of CO2 in our atmosphere.” by Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics, reposted
Please click on the title below to see my newer post on August 2, 2018, that has been reposted by others: Human CO2 emissions are not responsible for the increase in atmospheric CO2. So climate change is natural. by Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics This post proves the alarmist IPCC climate change claims are WRONG. You will
I presented a summary of this preprint at the “Basic Science of a Changing Climate” conference in Porto, Portugal, on September 7, 2018. – Ed Edwin X Berry, Ph.D., Physics Climate Physics LLC, 439 Grand Dr #147, Bigfork, Montana 59911, USA Copyright © 2018 by Edwin X Berry. This PREPRINT will be submitted to a
by Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics These 8 words are the death of climate change: It violates the Equivalence Principle, therefore it’s wrong. At its very core, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) violated a key principle of physics. Therefore, all IPCC climate claims and models are wrong. IPCC’s Big Idea (its fundamental
by Will Happer , Tribune News Service (TNS) Albert Einstein would almost certainly have been a global warming skeptic if he were alive today. Many distinguished, contemporary scientists are skeptics too. We are lucky that Einstein left a rich legacy of pithy quotes that reveal how he would probably relate to today’s cult of global
Basler Zeitung interviews Nils-Axel Mörner, The Global Warming Policy Forum Mr. Mörner, you have recently visited the Fiji islands in South Pacific several times in order to research changes on the coasts and sea levels. Why Fiji? Nils-Axel Mörner: I knew there would be a science conference in New York in June 2017 that focused on
by Edwin Berry, PhD, CCM By private email, a good physicist commented on my preprint, “Why human CO2 does not change climate.” Even if you are not a scientist, I think you will understand my reply. Dear ….., Thank you for your email. First, to answer your questions. You asked, Do you consider the clearing
by E.X Berry and K.W. Nielsen, 1966 In January 1966, four explorers flew the Desert Research Institute Beechcraft C-45 through Old Faithful Geyser and other geyser plumes in Yellowstone National Park, USA. (After Ed received his PhD degree in 1965, DRI Director Wendell Mordy made him the manager of DRI’s Airborne Research Facility. That’s why
by Dr. Ed Berry Al Gore framed the climate debate. He said, human carbon dioxide emissions increase atmospheric carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gases traps heat like a blanket that keeps you warm at night. It was that simple, he told us. People believe big Al’s story. Simplicity sells. But simple
