“This establishes once and for all, at least as far as Montana law is concerned, climate science is decidedly not settled.” – Attorney Quentin Rhoades Barhaugh v. Montana: Petition for Original Jurisdiction The Petition is based on its claims (highlighted) that human carbon emissions cause bad things to happen. They quote flaming alarmists for their […]
by Tom V. Segalstad (1998) A number of lifetimes and timescales are being used in both scientific and policy context to describe the behavior of heat-absorbing gases in the atmosphere. These concepts are very important for the discussion on whether anthropogenic CO2 will be accumulated in the atmosphere and exert an additional global “Greenhouse Effect”
People in several USA states and in New Zealand, Australia, Norway, Sweden, Germany, and France have indicated an interest in having a Climate Resolution that will be the foundation of their group’s political actions related to climate change. Therefore, I drafted this resolution for you who wish to make a climate resolution for your group.
Compare Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 with the figure below that I (Ed) plotted using IPCC-approved data with monthly resolution with the bonus that the data extend to 2015. The plot shows that Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 is correct. The annual change in the Mauna Loa data is calculated by subtracting the data for 12-months prior
Note: The described excellent calculations by Happer and Wijngaarden are independent from the question of how much nature or humans caused the increase in carbon dioxide. – Ed by David Wojick, Ph.D. Precision research by physicists William Happer and Willem van Wijngaarden has determined that the current levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and water vapor
The Glacier Country Pachyderm club invited me to speak at its luncheon on Friday, November 20. Their meeting is in the Red Lion Ball Room, 20 North Main Street, Kalispell, Montana. Please arrive about 10 minutes before noon. You will not be surprised that I will talk about climate. You will be surprised at what
How climate change panic costs us trillions, hurts the poor, and fails to fix the planet by Bjorn Lomborg (Basic Books: 2020) Reviewed by Thomas P. Sheahen Danish Economist Bjorn Lomborg is already well known for eight other books at the intersection of economics and public policy. “The Skeptical Environmentalist,” published in 2001 established him
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics No one told the President … And the invaders took over the kingdom. The New York Times reported on October 23, “The debate wasn’t normal by the standards of nearly all of American history… because one of the nominees — the sitting president — told one lie after another. He
This is an imaginary climate debate between Trump and Biden. PS: This is the first chapter in my book. I include more here that even I would use in a debate. My goal is to show a typical political candidate a larger view of a climate debate. Then the debater can choose what is needed
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics Dear Americans and Citizens of Free World Countries, President Trump is the leader of climate truth in the free world. If Trump goes down in the November election, it will be the end of climate truth in the free world. I am writing this on September 27, 2020, 37 days
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics, AMS CCM #180 Here is the brief email discussion where the Executive Director of the American Meteorological Society told an AMS director to not publish a short article I wrote at the AMS invitation. To: Edwin Berry <ed@edberry.com>Subject: Call for Articles: Fall 2020 CCM Newsletter Dear Edwin, This is a
Valerie (on the trapeze) and I are sailing US 7485 a minute after the start of one of 5 races where we won the US National Championship in Austin, Texas, in 1975. Ed Berry, PhD, Physics As of September 1, 2020, Republican leaders in Washington admit they are losing. They say so in their emails.
(Edit and send this to your local newspaper. 284 words to climate sanity. – Ed) All climate alarmism is based upon the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) invalid core theory of climate change: human CO2 emissions caused all the increase in atmospheric CO2 above 280 ppm and since 1750. Here’s why IPCC’s
Ed Berry, PhD, physics, CCM They claim President Trump is “anti-science.” President Trump is the most pro-science president for decades and the Democrats are the most anti-science party for a very long time. To make America great, we need smart people. One big reason to reelect President Trump is to save and rebuild America’s science
By Ed Berry, PhD, Atmospheric Physics, CCM IPCC’s invalid theory Get over it. You are not causing global warming. Those who tell you otherwise are lying to you. Here is new, powerful evidence that the climate alarmists are wrong. They flunk science. They have caused the greatest scam in human history. The United Nations IPCC
Below are the first two sections of the Introduction to my definitive paper on why IPCC’s core hypothesis is invalid. All the math and physics are done, but I am expanding the Introduction because too many people with PhD degrees still get confused. They don’t understand the basics of science because they have little or
by Dr. Ed Berry, PhD, Physics Climate Update Last October, I got an idea on how to calculate the human carbon cycle. My calculation puts climate alarmists in checkmate. Here’s how it works. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published its data for its assumed natural and human carbon cycles. A carbon
by Dr. Ed Berry Abstract The above-ground atomic bomb tests in the 1950s and 1960s almost doubled the level of 14C, in the form of CO2, in the atmosphere. The D14C data show how the 14CO2 returned to its natural level after the termination of the bomb tests in 1963. A simple physics model accurately
Two new replies to this letter added on January 30, 2020 by Ed Berry The Daily Inter Lake, Kalispell, Montana, published my opinion letter today here. I post it below. The international meeting in Madrid that was supposed to finalize the rules for the Paris agreement on climate change should never have occurred. The idea
