Ed Berry, PhD, Physics Climate change fanatics incorrectly believe government-paid scientists who advise the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are not influenced by the source of their money. On April 7, 2022, (Daily Inter Lake) Dorothy Bradley (D) and Bob Brown (R), claimed, “The world’s changing climate is the biggest issue.” […]
On Thursday, February 24, I drove from Bigfork to Helena – a 3.5-hour scenic drive each way – to participate in the mediation between me and Montana’s DOR. The mediation took 2 hours. The mediation judge was fair and not partial to DOR. We focused on accounting rules and data. I got everything I asked
Courtesy of Elon Musk, some things we should know to think logically. Fundamental Attribution Error. When someone is late, it’s because they’re lazy. But if you’re late, it was the traffic. Self-Serving Bias. Attributing your successes to your skill and your screw ups to bad luck. In-Group Favoritism. Tendency to favor those in our group over those who are
David Wojick commented on Ed’s paper on Climate Depot No doubt the IPCC is wrong but there are skeptical climate scientists that do not accept Ed Berry’s argument, including me. In my case it is not the calculations, but the conclusion that is the problem. Given the huge natural CO2 flux it is indeed true
by Bill Gray, Professor Emeritus, Colorado State University (AMS Fellow, Charney Award recipient, and over 50-year member) June 2011, about climate change. Originally posted: On The Hijacking of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) – Watts Up With That? [ I knew Bill Gray well even before I was a Program Manager for the National Science Foundation
The climate change delusion is a real-life rerun of this Twilight Zone story. Do you remember the Twilight Zone story where the distributor of a fortune made the recipients wear grotesque masks until the clock struck midnight? … When they took their masks off, they found their faces became the same as their masks. The
W.A. van Wijngaarden and Will Happer calculated the CO2 climate sensitivity – or the temperature increase when CO2 doubles – is 2.2 K for a fixed relative humidity. This means global warming caused by increased CO2 is insignificant. This shows CO2 does not cause climate change. See the green line in their Figure 4, also
Ed Berry Be thankful we can find the truth if we seek it, especially in climate change. Jane is an honest lady who tries her best to improve the world. She voted for a Democratic candidate in 2020 mainly because she is concerned that we are not doing enough to stop climate change. Although she
We have two excellent professional papers on climate change to review and compare. The first is by William A. van Wijngaarden and Will Happer. They calculate the CO2 climate sensitivity – the increase in temperature when CO2 doubles – is 2.2 K for a fixed relative humidity. The second is by David Coe, Walter Fabinski,
Chuck Wiese is the best meteorologist I know. Last year, he retired from flying the big jets for Delta Airlines. – Ed by Chuck Wiese, Meteorologist With the continued and terrible politicization of atmospheric science and climate, I thought I would take a look at the true cause of this historic Pacific Northwest heat
“This establishes once and for all, at least as far as Montana law is concerned, climate science is decidedly not settled.” – Attorney Quentin Rhoades Barhaugh v. Montana: Petition for Original Jurisdiction The Petition is based on its claims (highlighted) that human carbon emissions cause bad things to happen. They quote flaming alarmists for their
People in several USA states and in New Zealand, Australia, Norway, Sweden, Germany, and France have indicated an interest in having a Climate Resolution that will be the foundation of their group’s political actions related to climate change. Therefore, I drafted this resolution for you who wish to make a climate resolution for your group.
by Richard S. Courtney New plot to compare with Figure 1 Compare Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 with the figure below that I (Ed) plotted using IPCC-approved data with monthly resolution with the bonus that the data extend to 2015. The plot shows that Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 is correct. The annual change in the Mauna
Note: The described excellent calculations by Happer and Wijngaarden are independent from the question of how much nature or humans caused the increase in carbon dioxide. – Ed by David Wojick, Ph.D. Precision research by physicists William Happer and Willem van Wijngaarden has determined that the current levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and water vapor
How climate change panic costs us trillions, hurts the poor, and fails to fix the planet by Bjorn Lomborg (Basic Books: 2020) Reviewed by Thomas P. Sheahen Danish Economist Bjorn Lomborg is already well known for eight other books at the intersection of economics and public policy. “The Skeptical Environmentalist,” published in 2001 established him
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics No one told the President … And the invaders took over the kingdom. The New York Times reported on October 23, “The debate wasn’t normal by the standards of nearly all of American history… because one of the nominees — the sitting president — told one lie after another. He
This is an imaginary climate debate between Trump and Biden. PS: This is the first chapter in my book. I include more here that even I would use in a debate. My goal is to show a typical political candidate a larger view of a climate debate. Then the debater can choose what is needed
by Ed Berry, PhD, Physics, AMS CCM #180 Here is the brief email discussion where the Executive Director of the American Meteorological Society told an AMS director to not publish a short article I wrote at the AMS invitation. To: Edwin Berry <ed@edberry.com>Subject: Call for Articles: Fall 2020 CCM Newsletter Dear Edwin, This is a
Valerie (on the trapeze) and I are sailing US 7485 a minute after the start of one of 5 races where we won the US National Championship in Austin, Texas, in 1975. Ed Berry, PhD, Physics As of September 1, 2020, Republican leaders in Washington admit they are losing. They say so in their emails.
