Climate Politics

Liz Wheeler: 10 Reasons Not To Believe Climate Alarmists

ByDr. Ed October 10, 2020February 25, 2021 February 25, 2021

Post Views: 816

One Comment

Stephen Paul Anderson says:

October 22, 2020 at 4:49 pm

Enjoyed your book, Climate Miracle, immensely Dr. Ed. We need more brave physicists to step forward and tell the truth.

Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Dr. Ed on Preprint #3C: Carbon cycle model shows nature controls CO2 level: “Dear Renate, You are correct, my hypothesis (2) is the basis of my model, as I state. This is the…” May 5, 02:14
Renate on Preprint #3C: Carbon cycle model shows nature controls CO2 level: “Dr. Ed, The one hypothesis that the entire model rests on: “outflow is proportional to level” (2) on page 9/10…” May 5, 00:00
Hannah on The 45 Communist Goals (1963): “These things are being done systematically. We the People must see that these goals are never met. This is more…” May 4, 20:02
Dr. Ed on A Climate Resolution for your group: “Dear DMA, thank you for your comment. In response, I applied.” May 2, 17:53
DMA on A Climate Resolution for your group: “Dr Ed Biden fired all the climate advisors. Will you please consider applying for one of those openings? https://junkscience.com/2021/04/your-immediate-help-requested-nominate-members-for-epas-independent-science-advisory-boards/ If…” Apr 30, 11:04
Renate Decker on Preprint #3C: Carbon cycle model shows nature controls CO2 level: “Dr. Ed, The one hypothesis that the entire model rests on: “outflow is proportional to level” (2) on page 9/10…” Apr 28, 10:09
Kalispell Gazette on On Friday, in Kalispell, I will tell you new and surprising things about climate: “This is very good post here. Thanks for taking the time to post such precious information.” Apr 27, 04:50
Råde Ingvarsson on Slight, beneficial warming from more carbon dioxide!: “Although I like your creativity, I’m afraid I’d have to call this hypothesis of yours ridiculous at best, and uneducated…” Apr 24, 23:34
CD Marshall on Slight, beneficial warming from more carbon dioxide!: “My thoughts on the dip. Satellites are only detecting one part of the spectrum from disrupted light through a gas…” Apr 22, 18:45
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, I am not a “shill” for anybody or anything. You on the other hand …? As for my…” Apr 10, 10:20
DAVID ANDREWS on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Richard I guess being a shill for the coal industry that employed you has made you sensitive. Dave” Apr 10, 06:40
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, I answered your long ( and erroneous) diatribe which you addressed to Ed and me. For the benefit…” Apr 10, 02:25
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, Your long (and erroneous) diatribe addressed to Ed and me yet again ignores all you have been told…” Apr 10, 01:22
David Andrews on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Ed and Richard, So Ed and I are both able to reproduce something like Richard’s Figure 1 with Mauna Loa…” Apr 9, 21:05
Richard S Courtney on PREPRINT #1: Human CO2 has little effect on atmospheric CO2: “Don, Berry’s Figure 5 (above) is about the IPCC’s Bern Model which Berry says is wrong. So, What explains the…” Apr 8, 23:19
Dr. Ed on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Richard, I agree with your comment. David Andrews is having a difficult time moving from basic physics to atmospheric…” Apr 8, 11:10
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Ed, Thanks for your posting of the graph which “supports [my] Figure 1. I do appreciate your effort. However,…” Apr 8, 10:42
Dr. Ed on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Dave, To respond to your continued nagging of Richard over his Figure 1, please see the plot that I…” Apr 8, 10:25
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Ed, I have received an email comment on my last response to David Andrews. I copy it to here…” Apr 8, 03:30
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews: You say to me, “True, data is unimportant in your world. You said it, I didn’t.” I SAID…” Apr 8, 00:30