by Dr. Ed Berry Republicans and Democrats will always have different opinions on partisan issues. We get that. We can live with that. Jim Webb, 2016 Democratic presidential candidate correctly said, The other party is not the enemy. They are the opposition. In our democracy we are lucky to have an opposition, to have honest […]
by Dr. Ed Berry, PhD Physics, also posted in NewsWithViews A new Inquisition. Four hundred years ago, from 1610 to 1633, the Roman Catholic Church thought it knew more about the solar system than Galileo Galilei. So it subjected Galileo to an Inquisition. Now, in 2015, Pope Francis thinks he knows more about climate science than thousands of educated climate
by Dr. Ed Berry 97 percent of the people who claim our carbon dioxide emissions cause climate change haven’t a clue as to what they are talking about. They might as well claim the most important medical remedy is to use leaches to suck blood. Yes, they are that far away from physical reality. They also
Right-wing radicals love conspiracies. They believe the federal government is poisoning them with Chemtrails and Smart Dust. They believe Montana’s CSKT Water Compact is an Agenda 21 government conspiracy to put them into crowded housing units in California. They forget that the California liberals can’t stand them and would rather have them stay in Montana. Right-wing radicals are
Montana Professor Steve Running is not a Nobel Laureate
New analyses prove temperature drives CO2 change. CO2 does not drive temperature.
The Daily Inter Lake published this letter here. by Dr. Ed Berry Jerry Elwood (in a Jan. 4 Daily Inter Lake guest opinion) claims his case for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is based upon “unequivocal and easily accessible scientific evidence.” Let’s review his claim. Elwood claims the scientific case for catastrophic man-caused global warming is
“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and
by Steve Goreham, The Washington Times Earlier this month, a New York Times article by Andy Revkin voiced concern over a gap between “the consensus” of climate scientists and public acceptance of the theory of human-caused global warming. Revkin pointed to a study published in April by Dr. John Cook and other researchers, which claimed that
“…I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin [Trenberth] and I will keep them out somehow, even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!” —Phil Jones, Director of the Climatic Research Unit, July 8, 2004 by Steve Goreham, Master Resource Climatism, the belief that man-made greenhouse gases are
by Dr. Ed Berry A lot of good people got taken in by bad science recently. This is to set the record straight. On May 17 and 19, some people predicted the recent solar flare may cause earthquakes in northeast USA and a tsunami in the North Atlantic Ocean. One also said the asteroid 2013
by Marita Noon In honor of Margaret Thatcher’s memory, favorite quotes from the Iron Lady have popped up everywhere. This one came across my Facebook newsfeed: “Global warming ‘provides a marvelous excuse for worldwide, supra-national socialism.’” The hundreds of comments the quote received covered a variety of sentiments from hostility to adoration. A couple accused
by Klaus-Eckart Puls and Sebastian Lüning (translated, edited by P Gosselin, No Tricks Zone) Currently this 2012/13 winter in Germany and over large parts of Europe we’ve been finding lots of cold, snow and ice – the fifth winter of this type in a row. Who can still recall the prognoses and claims of some alarmists
We, the undersigned scientists, maintain that the case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated. Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a decade now. After controlling for population growth and property values, there has been no increase in damages from severe
Lest you think the climate alarmist leaders focus on true science, here is a leaked 2010 email thread where the late Steven Schneider, Paul Ehrlich and others reveal what they think of those who do not follow their global warming religion. – Ed ————————————————————————– —– Forwarded Message —– From: “Stephen H Schneider” <shs@STANFORD.EDU> To: SECTION63@LSW.NAS.EDU
by Michael Trigoboff, Ph.D., Computer Science Dep’t, Portland Community College Philosophers Michael R. Nelson and Kathleen Dean Moore seem to think that everyone who disagrees with them on scientific issues related to global warming is evil. I am more of a scientist then either of them and I disagree with them, but not because I’m evil. I’m skeptical
Published by Financial Post (and also here since I am a signer – Ed) Policy actions that aim to reduce CO2 emissions are unlikely to influence future climate. Policies need to focus on preparation for, and adaptation to, all dangerous climatic events, however caused. Open Letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations H.E. Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary-General,
Open Letter to the United States Senate You have recently received a letter from the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), purporting to convey a “consensus” of the scientific community that immediate and drastic action is needed to avert a climatic catastrophe. We do not seek to make the scientific arguments here (we
Regarding the National Policy Statement on Climate Change of the APS Council: As physicists who are familiar with the science issues, and as current and past members of the American Physical Society, we the undersigned urge the Council to revise its current statement* on climate change as follows, so as to more accurately represent the
