by Dr. Ed Berry Al Gore framed the climate debate. He said, human carbon dioxide emissions increase atmospheric carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gases traps heat like a blanket that keeps you warm at night. It was that simple, he told us. People believe big Al’s story. Simplicity sells. But simple […]
by Edwin Berry, PhD, Atmospheric Physics, also published in NewsWithViews Over 4000 people, including hundreds of scientists, read my article “Why our CO2 emissions do not increase Atmosphere CO2“. As I write this, there are 126 comments. One well-respected scientist wrote to me: Your article is (in my opinion) the BEST commentary yet that I’ve seen on this topic.
by Edwin Berry, PhD, Atmospheric Physics – also published in NewsWithViews The genius of Al Gore Give Al Gore an A for marketing and an F for science. But, hey, we all know the sale is in the marketing. The genius of Al Gore was to make his invalid myth simple: Our CO2 emissions increase Atmosphere
Note: Keith Pickering – an associate of Peter Glick of the National Academy of Sciences – makes the same argument as the UN IPCC. My rebuttal below is not as good as my later rebuttals but this July 2016 rebuttal was the beginning of my quest to find a better rebuttal… which my 2021 paper
by Dr. Ed Berry (Daily Inter Lake, Feb 5) Robert Petersen (Daily Inter Lake, Jan 31) writes “Look east at the glaciers that are no longer there,” to support his belief our CO2 causes global warming. He does not understand cause and effect. He assumes the almost linear decrease in Glacier Park glaciers since 1830 means
A short, total rebuttal to climate alarmism by Dr. Ed Berry, PhD, Physics (Daily Inter Lake and NewsWithViews) Aztec priests told people they must cut out their beating hearts to bring better climate for their crops. The people believed them. Today’s climate priests tell people they must cut out their CO2 emissions and pay penances to other nations,
Murry Salby April 18, 2013 Presentation of Prof. Murry Salby in Hamburg, Germany, with the title: Relationship between Greenhouse Gases and Global Temperature. Salby concludes the IPCC’s claim that carbon isotope ratios to prove burning of fossil fuels caused the increase in atmospheric CO2 is false. His reasons are (a) human emissions are only 5/150 of
by Dr. Ed Berry It used to be environmentalism was a good thing. Then they made it synonymous with the climate change religion. Now it is no longer a good thing. It’s a very bad thing because it’s a harmful lie. Oh. I called it a “religion.” Well, Ivar Giaever also called climate change alarmism
by Richard J. Petschauer (January 18, 2011) 1. Background Climate science is certainly not settled considering how poorly the models handle latent heat transfer. This is a process involving heat loss on the surface from evaporation that is moved to a corresponding heat gain when condensation occurs during cloud formation, causing added heat to be
by Tom V. Segalstad, CO2Science In a paper recently published in the international peer-reviewed journal Energy & Fuels, Dr. Robert H. Essenhigh (2009), Professor of Energy Conversion at The Ohio State University, addresses the residence time (RT) of anthropogenic CO2 in the air. He finds that the RT for bulk atmospheric CO2, the molecule 12CO2,
by Dr. Ed Berry Tom Quirk shows natural variability of the climate is the prime cause of increasing CO2, not the emissions of CO2 from the use of fossil fuels. See: Energy & Environment, 20, 1-2, Jan 2009, pp 105-121 The IPCC core hypothesis is that human CO2 causes all the increase in atmospheric CO2
