Murry Salby Archives - edberry.com

What is really behind the increase in atmospheric CO2?

November 13, 2018 November 18, 2018 / 7 Comments / Climate Physics

Murry Salby: Atmospheric Carbon, 18 July 2016

November 21, 2016 November 24, 2018 / 12 Comments / Climate Physics

Note: below is the first time an associate of Peter Glick (of the National Academy of Sciences) took time to comment on this site. Here, Keith Pickering makes the same argument as the UN IPCC. My rebuttal here is not as good as my 2018 rebuttals to this IPCC argument. As I show simply in …

Murry Salby: Atmospheric Carbon, 18 July 2016 Read More »

Murry Salby: CO2 follows Integral of Temperature

November 24, 2015 April 24, 2018 / 7 Comments / Climate Physics

April 18, 2013 Presentation of Prof. Murry Salby in Hamburg, Germany, with the title: Relationship between Greenhouse Gases and Global Temperature.

Murry Salby: CO2 does not cause climate change

September 7, 2014 April 24, 2018 / Leave a Comment / Climate Physics

Professor Murry Salby: Our CO2 does not cause climate change

Murry Salby destroys Global Warming claims

September 3, 2014 February 23, 2017 / Leave a Comment / Climate Physics

Nature, not human CO2, causes global warming.

Raymond Børeng on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Keep up the excellent work and maybe this paper will ad some more information https://watervaporandwarming.blogspot.com/2019/11/abstract-during-time-periodwhen-water.html?fbclid=IwAR08x9jb5YQB79AgyQmh2JYWPFSk7IJ2k0vto-2xUmUdgLXj-yuFetkrNcM Nice weekend” Jan 17, 08:09

YODA on Why human CO2 does not change climate: “It appears from this article that human CO2 is quite different from nature's CO2. If human CO2 is 4% and…” Jan 17, 02:33

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear Allan , My Preprint #1 discusses the "mass balance argument " in its section 4.1. It concludes this argument…” Jan 16, 11:42

Jacques-Marie Moranne on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Hi Alan, I do not need it to falsify CAGW either : I completely agree with you on this point.…” Jan 16, 11:05

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, Thank you for your question. As you know, the Physics model allows individual calculation of all…” Jan 16, 07:31

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, Maybe I can ask you a question here. Let's consider a scenario where we add a particular isotope of…” Jan 16, 03:57

Hermann Harde on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Some comments on Simon Aegerter's note from January 7: What we can learn from the paper of Gruber et al.…” Jan 15, 11:10

Brian on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “@then there’s physics: “the decay of C14 might reasonably represent the residence time of a molecule, but it doesn’t properly…” Jan 15, 10:41

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, How can you think I confuse residence time and adjustment time when I quote IPCC's definitions…” Jan 15, 08:58

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, Well, it seems to me that you are confusing residence and adjustment times (or assuming they're the same, which…” Jan 15, 07:28

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, Here is the link to Preprint #1: https://edberry.com/blog/climate/climate-physics/contradictions-to-ipccs-climate-change-theory/ You can also find it by clicking "All"…” Jan 15, 07:02

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, Maybe you can point me to your previous pre-print. I can't seem to find it.” Jan 15, 03:06

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, Section 4.2 of THIS post shows the calculation of the human carbon cycle. Yes, it shows…” Jan 14, 14:45

Stephen P Anderson on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Why don't you ask him if he's taken into account all the seaweed in the ocean?” Jan 14, 14:43

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, Can I clarify what you're implying in section 4.2? Are you simply suggesting that only 14.7% of the CO2…” Jan 14, 14:35

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, If you want to learn physics, let me be your teacher. First, "IPCC natural carbon cycle"…” Jan 14, 14:07

Michael Beattie on Why human CO2 does not change climate: “Never mind I have reread his post. He has his ins and outs back to front. Since we are talking…” Jan 14, 13:24

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, If you're using the bomb test data, then you're almost certainly confusing residence time and adjustment time. It's well…” Jan 14, 13:14

Michael Beattie on Why human CO2 does not change climate: “From Doug Lightfoot post Totals: Out annually = 219 GtC; In annually = 224 GtC; difference = 5 GtC Human…” Jan 14, 12:58

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear "then there's physics", Every hypothesis must be anchored to data. The IPCC natural carbon cycle data is the best…” Jan 14, 12:50

Murry Salby

Sign up for my free climate emails.