Ferenc Miskolczi Archives

Ferenc Miskolczi: The Greenhouse Effect

January 23, 2016 October 19, 2017 / Leave a Comment / Climate Physics

Download Miskolczi 2015: “The Greenhouse Effect and the Infrared Radiative Structure of the Earth’s Atmosphere“

Ferenc Miskolczi: The stable stationary value of the Earth’s IR optical thickness

April 29, 2013 October 19, 2017 / Leave a Comment / Climate Physics

[embeddoc url=”http://edberry.com/SiteDocs/2013/04/EGU2011-13622_presentationS.pptx” viewer=”microsoft”]

The stable stationary value of the Earth’s global average atmospheric infrared optical thickness

August 18, 2011 October 19, 2017 / Leave a Comment / Climate Physics

by Ferenc Miskolczi Presented by Miklos Zagoni EGU2011 Vienna Download PDF Conclusions According to the simple-minded or ‘classic’ view of the greenhouse effect the global average greenhouse temperature change may be estimated by the direct application of the Beer-Lambert law moderated by local or regional scale weather phenomena (R. Pierrehumbert, A. Lacis, R. Spencer, R. …

The stable stationary value of the Earth’s global average atmospheric infrared optical thickness Read More »

CO2 Cannot Cause Global Warming

February 17, 2011 October 19, 2017 / 32 Comments / Climate Physics

Ferenc Miskolczi’s Saturated Greenhouse Effect Theory by Miklos Zagoni, SPPI, December 18, 2009 The Earth’s atmosphere differs in essence from that of Venus and Mars. Our atmosphere is not totally cloud-covered, as is Venus: globally, about 40% of the sky is always clear. Also we have huge ocean surfaces that serve as a practically unlimited …

CO2 Cannot Cause Global Warming Read More »

Ferenc Miskolczi’s Saturated Greenhouse Effect Theory: References

February 5, 2011 October 19, 2017 / Leave a Comment / Climate Physics

Miskolszi (2007): Greenhouse effect in semi-transparent planetary atmospheres. IDŐJÁRÁS, Vol. 111, No. 1, January–March 2007, pp. 1–40. PDF Miklos Zagoni (December 18, 2009): Ferenc Miskolczi’s Saturated Greenhouse Effect Theory: CO2 cannot cause any more global warming. SPPI Original Paper. Miskolczi (2010): The stable stationary value of the earth’s global average atmospheric Planck-weighted Greenhouse-gas optical thickness. PDF Discussion with Miklos Zagoni (2011) ClimateClash.com. Miskolczi …

Ferenc Miskolczi’s Saturated Greenhouse Effect Theory: References Read More »

Ferenc Miskolczi Greenhouse Effect References

January 30, 2011 October 19, 2017 / 2 Comments / Climate Physics

Ferenc Miskolczi Greenhouse Effect References Read More »

NASA silenced Ferenc Miskolczi on his GHG research

January 30, 2011 October 19, 2017 / Leave a Comment / Climate Physics

by Dr Miklos Zagoni, Physicist, Budapest, Hungary, 31 Dec, 2009 In 2004, Dr. Ferenc Miskolczi published a paper “The greenhouse effect and the spectral decomposition of the clear-sky terrestrial radiation“, in the Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service (Vol. 108, No. 4, October–December 2004, pp. 209–251.). The co-author of the article was his boss at NASA (Martin Mlynczak). …

NASA silenced Ferenc Miskolczi on his GHG research Read More »

Raymond Børeng on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Keep up the excellent work and maybe this paper will ad some more information https://watervaporandwarming.blogspot.com/2019/11/abstract-during-time-periodwhen-water.html?fbclid=IwAR08x9jb5YQB79AgyQmh2JYWPFSk7IJ2k0vto-2xUmUdgLXj-yuFetkrNcM Nice weekend” Jan 17, 08:09

YODA on Why human CO2 does not change climate: “It appears from this article that human CO2 is quite different from nature's CO2. If human CO2 is 4% and…” Jan 17, 02:33

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear Allan , My Preprint #1 discusses the "mass balance argument " in its section 4.1. It concludes this argument…” Jan 16, 11:42

Jacques-Marie Moranne on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Hi Alan, I do not need it to falsify CAGW either : I completely agree with you on this point.…” Jan 16, 11:05

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, Thank you for your question. As you know, the Physics model allows individual calculation of all…” Jan 16, 07:31

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, Maybe I can ask you a question here. Let's consider a scenario where we add a particular isotope of…” Jan 16, 03:57

Hermann Harde on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Some comments on Simon Aegerter's note from January 7: What we can learn from the paper of Gruber et al.…” Jan 15, 11:10

Brian on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “@then there’s physics: “the decay of C14 might reasonably represent the residence time of a molecule, but it doesn’t properly…” Jan 15, 10:41

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, How can you think I confuse residence time and adjustment time when I quote IPCC's definitions…” Jan 15, 08:58

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, Well, it seems to me that you are confusing residence and adjustment times (or assuming they're the same, which…” Jan 15, 07:28

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, Here is the link to Preprint #1: https://edberry.com/blog/climate/climate-physics/contradictions-to-ipccs-climate-change-theory/ You can also find it by clicking "All"…” Jan 15, 07:02

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, Maybe you can point me to your previous pre-print. I can't seem to find it.” Jan 15, 03:06

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, Section 4.2 of THIS post shows the calculation of the human carbon cycle. Yes, it shows…” Jan 14, 14:45

Stephen P Anderson on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Why don't you ask him if he's taken into account all the seaweed in the ocean?” Jan 14, 14:43

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, Can I clarify what you're implying in section 4.2? Are you simply suggesting that only 14.7% of the CO2…” Jan 14, 14:35

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear “then there’s physics”, If you want to learn physics, let me be your teacher. First, "IPCC natural carbon cycle"…” Jan 14, 14:07

Michael Beattie on Why human CO2 does not change climate: “Never mind I have reread his post. He has his ins and outs back to front. Since we are talking…” Jan 14, 13:24

...and Then There's Physics on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Ed, If you're using the bomb test data, then you're almost certainly confusing residence time and adjustment time. It's well…” Jan 14, 13:14

Michael Beattie on Why human CO2 does not change climate: “From Doug Lightfoot post Totals: Out annually = 219 GtC; In annually = 224 GtC; difference = 5 GtC Human…” Jan 14, 12:58

Dr. Ed on PREPRINT #2: The Physics Model Carbon Cycle for Human CO2: “Dear "then there's physics", Every hypothesis must be anchored to data. The IPCC natural carbon cycle data is the best…” Jan 14, 12:50

Ferenc Miskolczi

Sign up for my free climate emails.