Trump can stop New World Order attack on America

My prediction: To the surprise of most of Americans, Trump will continue as President … unless he gives up his executive authority to stop the fraudulent election. – Ed

“This may be the most important speech I’ve ever made.”


As President I have no higher duty than to defend the laws and the constitution of the United States. That is why I am determined to protect our election system, which is now under coordinated assault and siege.

Millions of votes were cast illegally in the swing states alone, and if that’s the case, the results of the individual swing states must be overturned, and overturned immediately.

The Democrats has this election rigged right from the beginning. They used the pandemic as an excuse to mail out tens of millions of ballots, which led to a big part of the fraud… and there is no one happier than China.

Dramatically eroding the integrity of our elections was the Democrats’ number one priority. For a simple reason: They wanted to steal the 2020 presidential election. All of the Democrat efforts to expand mail-in balloting laid the groundwork for the systematic and pervasive fraud that occurred in this election.

The only conceivable reason why you would block commonsense measures to verify legal eligibility for voting, is you are trying to encourage, enable, solicit or carry out fraud. It is important for Americans to understand that these destructive changes to our election laws were NOT a necessary response to the pandemic. The pandemic simply gave the Democrats an excuse to do what they were trying to do with many many years.

Thursday, November 19, 2020.

On September 12, 2018, President Trump signed Executive Order 13848, entitled:

“Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election”

Read it here and you will see the power that President Trump has to deal with this election fraud. The OMB summary is here.


The Hammer is the key to the coup. The Dems used it to change the election data.

Brannon Howse: November 4, 2020

Quotes from Brannon Howse report:

“THE HAMMER IS THE KEY TO THE COUP” — Admiral James A. “Ace” Lyons, On His Death Bed, Speaking To His Longtime Friend, Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney 

They stole a super-surveillance government tool for foreign surveillance and they turned it against America and are using it to steal the Presidential election of 2020. 

In February 2009, the Obama administration commandeered a powerful supercomputer system known as THE HAMMER. THE HAMMER includes an exploit application known as SCORECARD that is capable of hacking into elections and stealing the vote, according to CIA contractor-turned-whistleblower Dennis Montgomery, who designed and built THE HAMMER.

THE WHISTLEBLOWER TAPES, confidential audio recordings released by U.S. DIstrict Judge G. Murray Snow’s courtroom in November 2015, revealed that SCORECARD was deployed by the Obama team against Florida election computers to steal the 2012 presidential election on behalf of President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden.

SCORECARD is now being activated to steal the vote on behalf of Joe Biden once again. Biden utilized THE HAMMER and SCORECARD while running for Vice President in 2012. Votes are again being stolen on Joe Biden’s behalf as he runs for President of the United States in 2020.

This time, SCORECARD is stealing votes in Florida, Georgia, Texas, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, and Arizona, according to Montgomery.

SCORECARD steals elections by tampering with the computers at the transfer points of state election computer systems and outside third party election data vaults as votes are being transferred. The Obama White House had an encrypted VPN in order to access THE HAMMER at will.

Evidence of Democrat voter fraud is overwhelming.

Vigo County has voted correctly for the president since 1890 with 2 exceptions. In 2020, Vigo County gave Trump 56.2 percent and Biden 41.45 percent. For Vigo County to have voted 56 to 41 for Trump and Trump still loses the national election suggests voter fraud. The Dems forgot to butcher the Vigo election data.

In Pennsylvania, Trump was ahead until the Dems brought in new absentee votes that were 80 percent for Biden. Just enough to throw the election to Biden.

In Michigan, Trump was ahead until the Dems brought in new absentee votes that were 68 percent for Biden. Just enough to throw the election to Biden.

The difference in the Dem/Rep ratio for the absentee votes versus the non-absentee votes in Pennsylvania and Michigan suggests voter fraud.

In every case, the newly revealed “absentee” ballots were just enough to change a Trump win into a Biden win. It’s as if the Dems waited to see the real result of the election and then they “manufactured” the absentee votes to assure a Biden win without making it look like Biden won by too much.

Do you see those write-in votes in Pennsylvania? I was watching these voting numbers and I notices the write-in votes would gradually increase as expected. But then they would go back down. I wonder if those votes were moved to Biden.

Vigo County, Indiana

Vigo County, Indiana, has voted for the winning president in every election but two since 1890.

Vigo County gave Trump 56.2% and Biden 41.45%.

That is not close. In fact, that is evidence that the 2020 election may be a fraud. Here is the official data:

Burt Rutan wrote an article similar to this one.

By the way, if you want to bet on Trump’s eventual win, you can get great odds on Predict It.

Libertarian votes helped Biden

Had the Libertarians voted for Trump, then Trump would have won Pennsylvania, Nevada, Georgia, and Wisconsin according to NYT data and before the large fraudulent votes came in.


If Libertarians had voted for Trump, then Trump would have won Pennsylvania with 3,367,097 votes.



If the Libertarians had voted for Trump, then Trump would have won Nevada with 604,460 votes. If the Constitutionalists also voted for Trump, then Trump would have won with 607,038 votes


If Libertarians had voted for Trump, Trump would have won Georgia with 2,509,875 votes.


If Libertarians had voted for Trump, then Trump would have won Wisconsin with 1,648,277 votes.

I have written over and over again, about how third-party voters betray their own desires. Their works betray their acts. They vote irrationally and immorally. Of course, these Libertarians don’t get it. They just get pissed off.

In 2020, they outdid themselves. They destroyed President Trump and they cost themselves, America, and the free-world their freedom.

I will wrap up this post by copying the excellent post by Ray DiLorenzo in Paul Vallely’s Stand Up American newsletter.

There’s No Hiding It…It’s a Coup

Ray DiLorenzo

What we are witnessing from a front row seat, is nothing less than a carefully orchestrated coup d’état, the third coup attempt inflicted on President Trump. The first being the Russia conspiracy fiction, the second being the failed impeachment.  

The above quote, I believe, is no lie. Biden told the world a few years back that Seal Team Six conducted the raid on bin Laden, putting the SEALS and their families in grave danger. Was that a gaffe or dementia? I don’t believe Biden is aware of what he says much of the time or their consequences. Whether gaffe or dementia, Biden told us the truth.  

The Washington and corporate establishment, or swamp, if you prefer, was not going to accept an outsider, someone they could not control. For Donald Trump to be President of the United States meant the end of their power base, a threat to their rice bowl. This establishment takes care of themselves, not the citizens of this country. Contingencies were probably discussed the moment Donald Trump rode down the escalator. The conspirators were not going to stoop to using third-world methods, storming the castle so to speak. They were going to use righteous indignation, fabricated stories of Russian collusion, protecting democracy, yada, yada.  

I have seen many election returns over the years, but I never saw returns like those I witnessed on Tuesday and into the weekend. Every one of them apparently had one thing in common…the craving to report a Trump loss. States that had a Trump lead of 5 or 6 points with 89% of the vote in were held back, not called, but states with 40 or 50% of the vote in with Biden with a lead of 1 or 2% were called. We are being led to believe that in an election where Democrats are getting a shellacking everywhere, Donald Trump is losing big?  

This coup was planned well in advance. Whether the Coronavirus was planned or just an opportunity, it makes no difference at this point. It was used. Pelosi and Schumer pushed hard to eliminate voting machines and move to paper ballots; it gave the Left ample opportunity to skew the election results. We’ve read everyday of ballots destroyed, not delivered, found in dumpsters, altered, held back during counting, back-dated, and harvested. For any criminal organization, it was a field day.  

The polls were purposely falsified to show Biden winning the election by a healthy margin, to give a sense of expectation. How could the polling be so wrong twice in a row? Never mind that Biden couldn’t draw flies, attracting maybe a few dozen people to a typical rally while Trump drew tens of thousands of dedicated fans at every rally. It is important to realize that these polls were not projections, but quotas.  

Red states were apparently left alone since they couldn’t be contained, but battleground states or states that Democrats controlled or had Democrat governors were the main targets. When the voting showed Biden losing or not meeting the quota, they either introduced more mail-in ballots or stopped the counting for the day so ballots could be delivered overnight under the cover of darkness. The media did their part by purposely delaying the calling of some states to give them more time to manipulate the vote tallies.

It was never more obvious than in Michigan where tens of thousands of mail-in ballots suddenly appeared overnight after the election. Some wards in Milwaukee reported more votes than registered voters, with a state turnout of more than 85%, something that has never occurred in their history.

In Wisconsin, 112,000 Biden ballots appeared between 3:30am – 4:30am. In 6 Blue states where Trump had a healthy lead, they suddenly stopped counting.

Philadelphia, the birthplace of our constitutional republic, had one area with 23,777 ballots for Biden and none for Trump. Pennsylvania changed counting procedures and regulations just prior to the election that enabled them to accept votes days after the election with many of them with no clear postmark.

In South Carolina, a federal judge ruled that signatures on ballots did not have to match. North Carolina had 100% of their precincts reporting with Trump in the lead and it wasn’t called.  

The Trump team needs to show that the USPS did not and could not deliver the mail-in ballots to a point where depending on them was a reasonable expectation. In addition, the mail-only voting in many states, due to differences in state laws, was either not possible or illegal.

The legislators of the states of AZ, GA, PA, MI, NC, NV, and WI need to get involved and push for either an investigation or deem the elections in their states as invalid beyond correction and require new voting by machines and/or traditional absentee ballot.  

The Democrat Party leadership has become an organized crime syndicate. It is filled with corruption and hatred for our country. They have caused our great nation to enter the realm of the third world.  

As a nation, we cannot allow this corruption, this coup, to stand. Our nation will be changed forever in the eyes of the world. The honor, dignity, and prestige of our country is on the line.  

Much of this nation has sinned greatly and will reap what it has sown, but for the rest of us…In God We Trust.


  1. The joker in the deck is the invisible Trump support, voters who do not participate in and therefore skew public polls – towards Biden.

    After 4 years of unscrupulous conduct by the Democrat Party and their accessories (the media, DOJ, and FBI), this support is almost surely greater than it was in 2016, when it “trumped” the pollsters, media, and talking heads. But no one, not even Trafalgar, which attempts to account for it, knows how much greater is the invisible Trump support.

    If it’s much greater than it was in 2016 (for example, if it’s reflected in the huge crowds greeting Trump daily), then the media, pollsters, and talking heads will again be wearing egg. What a nice image. Time will tell.

  2. Love your website Dr. Berry…….While I agree with your optimism, I suspect there will be a landslide victory for President Trump, equaling the Electoral College votes of 2016. Pollsters are showing a narrow gap of Trump over Biden here in Michigan but they have no access to the actual turn out of flash Trump rallies on highways and the overwhelming numbers of Trump yard signs, and flags all over the state.

    I have never before witnessed such a groundswell of open support for any political candidate in my lifetime……….And from my online conservative friends scattered across the fruited plains, the same goes for their communities……….

    P.S. Thank you for responding to a question I posed to you a couple of weeks ago……

      1. This morning after, I’m not so certain…..Democrats wrote the book on ballot harvesting and voter fraud and we are now witnessing it in action. They’ve had months to plan for it and now they are implementing it. Michigan should have been a no brainer for Trump but mysteriously there was a huge jump in votes for Biden early this morning that launched him ahead of Trump.
        This news info just came out a short while ago: “Tens of thousands of absentee ballots arrived in large U.S. Postal Service boxes at the TCF Center in Detroit, Mich. on Wednesday morning at 3:30 am. The TCF Center, formerly Cobo Hall, is where the absentee ballots are counted for Wayne County, which is the home of Detroit.” Former Michigan state senator Patrick Colbeck wrote that the total number of ballots dumped on the counting board totaled 38,000.
        Here is the link: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/tens-of-thousands-of-ballots-dropped-off-in-usps-boxes-at-detroit-absentee-ballot-processing-center-at-330-am-after-election/

  3. We will be spending a day watching the debate analysis and results. But our ‘day’ will be in UK so 4th November. I have my T shirt and mug. We will watch everything we can but not the disgraceful BBC or CNN. If only the media was nuetral and actions were the measuring stick for opinion and support. We want truth. From what we can see there is more chance of honesty from Trump than from Biden. Trump supports the American people where social responsibility is important and socialism is a scam.
    Get it right over there, please.

  4. It will only be able to be stolen IF it is a close race. If DJT starts to run away with it… it is game over, especially if he gets PA. What Sleepy Joe said about doing away with oil production puts PA in the mix. The ONLY problem is that MANY have already voted and CANNOT change their votes. PLUS they are desperately trying to steal Texas and the southwest. If they get Texas it will be a toss-up. I see this going into the second week of November before he can declare re-election. Then the fireworks begin in the cities. Keep your powder dry all……

  5. I hope you are correct. A possible problem with PA is the PA Supreme Court allowing the counting of ballots received for 3 days after November 3 and SCOTUS not overturning that decision. PA is ripe for fraud. IMO, there are several factors in play. 1) the enthusiasm gap for Trump is huge 2) despite the enthusiasm gap, Trump’s personality has alienated some number of people (including some republicans) who can’t get past his personality to recognize his accomplishments 3) Gen Z – how many will actually go out and vote and will those who have been brainwashed vote in greater numbers that those who have not. 4 ) the black and hispanic vote – have enough people in the minority community come to realize that they are no more than useful pawns to the democratic party. I pray for a landslide.

  6. If it’s a close race, I think voter fraud will give it to Biden. So, Trump needs to win by a large margin.

  7. Absent planned voter fraud and other criminal actions, I agree with your prognostication. I would like to see a large margin of victory for Trump in order to stem some of marxist tide that has been so supported by the institutionalized media. Only then will real change be able to be accomplished in the District of Criminals. Many federal agencies need to be sanitized.

  8. Dr. Ed,

    We have learned from you great education efforts about climate science and Americana – from Ishi to Biden and Trump. You explain why you think Trump will win in 2020.

    Do you have advice what we should do for a better world if Trump doesn’t win?

  9. Dear Dr. Ed:
    Unfortunately I accessed the PredictIt website after the Biden vs. Trump investment option had closed since I would have invested in Trump.
    With that being said, I live in S.E. Michigan and the enthusiasm for Trump has been off the charts. There is no question in my mind that Trump is going to win Michigan and if he does, James will win the senate since there is no way a Trump voter would split their ticket and vote for Peters………..Had the same number of Republicans who voted for Trump in 2016 gone to the polls in 2018, James would have defeated Stabenow. But they stayed home and gave her the election when she garnered the same number of votes that Hillary lost with……..

    Even Congresswoman Debbie Dingell, whose husband John always had the support of the UAW, is now worried following conversations she had last week with auto workers who say they are now voting for Trump…….

    So my suggestion to you Dr. Ed, look closely at the prices being offered for a John James win and think about what I stated above…………

    Good luck Dr. Ed and MAGA

  10. George Soros’ money and Trump hate
    (As opposed to Biden’s love) got the election for Trump.
    The swamp is too deep .
    I am afraid that your book about climate change did not do the job .

    1. Dear Mojesmu,

      The swamp is indeed deep. My book is sufficient to do the job.

      However, the Republican gatekeepers, with access to the President, refused to tell President Trump about my book. If President had my book before his last debate, he could have blasted Biden on climate and picked up at least 5 percent more votes.

      It was an opportunity lost.

  11. Dr. Ed,

    Thanks for your outstanding efforts on your website: edberry.com and your book, “Climate Miracle.”

    It looks like Joe Biden is moving to the White House and Kamala Harris will be one heart beat away. The two biggest reasons why this is happening in my opinion are:

    1) The massive, half-century long efforts by the Democrats (Jimmy Carter, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and his Science Advisor, John Holdren) to instill fear in American citizens about catastrophic man-made global warming that aims to shutdown use of fossil fuels and nuclear power AND the corollary themes that go with it. The Democrats have succeeded. Enough Americans accept the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, CAGW, hoax to hand control of the United States government to Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Democrat State Governors and Legislatures. Only the Republican controlled Senate will prevent a total runaway destruction of America’s governing institutions.

    2) Trump’s public performance. The President of the United States needs to be a Statesman to the world and personal inspiration to a majority of Americans. That didn’t happen. He is different that George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy and Robert E. Lee. Trump is different than Ed Berry. Many of his programs and changes he worked for were necessary and good. If he only had been more like any of the people I just named, he would still be president in 2021.

    There is a bright side. If Trump spends the next four years analyzing the things he did that caused him to lose, he might become President again in 2024, possibly for two terms.

    Finally, the Party Platform of the Democrats, some 90 pages, is full of wild generalizations that not even the Creator of the Universe has accomplished in five billion years. Democrats tell me emphatically that NO Democrat expects or demands Biden to fulfill it.

    The Party Platform of the Republicans, less than 10 pages, contains specific ideas that can be accomplished.

    For the sake of the free world, economic prosperity, sound education, and peace the principles of the Republican Party MUST prevail over the wild, empty promises of the Democrats.

  12. Fred Hammel
    We the public who voted to keep out socialism must start pushing the Oath to the Constitution, every elected official, every cop, military, all judges, FBI, and many more. Ginsbeg never followed her Oath to the Constitution. Most democrats never almost never their Oath. They took that Oath to protect this country from foreign and domestic enemies. The democrats are domestic enemies. They should be in jail or at least kick out of office. If the Oath was followed, I would not care what party you belong to.

  13. Dr. Ed,
    Maybe you could start a red wave by persuading the Libertarians in Montana to cease running Senatorial candidates and put an end to the reign of Jon Tester. They’ve handed him the brass ring in his last 2 elections by withholding just a few thousand otherwise Republican votes. All he has to do is to blather regularly on select Montana issues, supported by Coastal money, and he survives. Alternatively, how about replacing district judges who regularly block petitions to put the Green Party on the primary ballot.

  14. These stupid libertarians! Diverting marginal votes and wrecking the alternative most in line with there own free choice platform. Suicide, committed also by many climate sceptics (not you) using a technical vocabulary impossible for ordinary voters to understand.

  15. Well Ed, despite your excellent work dealing with the global warming hype unfortunately you seem to be a poor looser. The fact that you are shouting fraud as a wrong doing against the 45th president, who was a master liar, distorting facts, etc. makes your views very questionable. So I suggest you return to what you seem to know best, i.e. the IPCC hype surrounding the grave errors relating to so-called manmade global warming. Join with your knowledge to fight the stupidity disseminated by the believers in the role given by IPCC to the CO2, which we all know is just a minor greenhous gas compared to water vapour and actually the Sun combined with the thermodynamics controlling the three phases of water.


  16. Let the Supreme Court decide the winner. I just hope that the verdict won’t trigger another civil war. I always believed that the truth ultimately will win.

  17. The United States Constitution makes no provision for the popular vote for President. The state legislatures are empowered to select a slate of electors to cast their ballots for President. WHY aren’t the Republican majority legislatures in the states where the result is questionable taking action? They are legally allowed to do so!!!

  18. Dr. Ed
    Thank you for this info. Can the Biden voting data failure to pass Benford’s law prove the extent of the fraud or just indicate a problem. Do you think it can be used in court to argue for election invalidation? Can it be used to “spot” the fraudulent numbers?

    1. Dear DMA,
      I changed my comment to agree with the red text paragraph above.

      Benford’s Law deviations in voting would not be a good approach in court. The math is too complicated and the challenges would waste time. It would be much better to use the direct statistical proof of a fraud.

      For example, look at the left chart for Chicago. The bars are the counts of votes for many precincts. If the vote count for Biden from a precinct begin with a 1, then this adds one count to column 1. Etc.

      The plot of Biden’s data should look something like the plot of Trump’s data which is close to the normal curve. Clearly, Biden’s data is fraudulent according to Benford’s Law.

      To find the precincts responsible for the deviation from the normal curve, assuming we had the data, we would select the precincts that had turned in vote counts that began with 3 and 4. Of course, that would give some false positives but it would narrow our search. Then, what if we found that many of these precincts were all close together in a certain county?

      Notice the data for Trump are low in 3 and 4 while Biden’s are high in 3 and 4. I am not sure what to make of this but I guess a specialist in Benford’s Law might see more in the data than I do.

      1. Thank you again. I just watched a real eye-opener video referenced on Jo Nova’s site in one of the comments–https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=emb_logo
        It is by a security group and they detail several catches in the data coming out and their deep dive into the voting machines, software, and methods that looks to be pure evidence of the fraud.

      2. Dr. Ed, did you review the underlying data before you posted this? OF COURSE Benford’s Law isn’t holding in Democratic Chicago.

        This is a heavily democratic area and 95% of the ward sizes are between 218 and 776. Benford’s Law depends on an unbounded set (or one that spans multiple orders of magnitude) to have a chance of being. The ONLY wards where a strong majority candidate is EVER going to get a leading 1 in the nubmers (predicted 30% of the time by Benford’s Law) is if the ward size is between 100 and 250, or 1000+. That’s about 100 or the wards out of 2054, or 5%. Biden got a leading 1 in 114 of the wards, almost exactly what you would predict based on the ward sizes.

        The data is EXACTLY what you would expect, given the distribution of ward sizes in Chicago and a strongly favored candidate.

        1. Dear Rob,
          Thank you very much for your explanation. You presented the best explanation I have read about Benford’s Law. I am not an expert in Benford’s Law so I accept your explanation. To me, the key part of your explanation is this sentence:

          “Benford’s Law depends on an unbounded set (or one that spans multiple orders of magnitude) to have a chance of being.”

          To further enlighten me and the readers, you can expand your explanation to show why this argument is wrong:

          “Data for Trump are close enough to Benford’s Law to suggest the data are random. So, how can the results for Biden not also be random because each vote is binary, either for Biden or for Trump?”

        2. Dr. Ed, the apparent agreement of Trump’s Chicago numbers is a function of the different ranges that Biden’s and Trump’s vote counts fall in. In a heavily partisan city, if the votes split 75% Biden and 25% Trump, Biden’s data will naturally span about 3 times the range of Trump, so their numbers will be grouped in different areas.

          Whether the numbers appear to follow Benford’s Law when the numbers come from a relatively narrow band (the case for both candidates) is driven by the size of the range more than anything. If you draw random numbers from 10-99, you’ll get about 1/9 in each group – “violating” Benford’s Law. Here it is complicated a bit because each precinct is a different size, but let’s look at where Trump’s numbers fall:

          In 90% of the 2054 precincts, Trump got between 9 and 240 votes. So basically all of his numbers will fall between 10-99 (66% of precincts), 100-199 (19%), or 200-240 (6%). So most of the time, we would expect to see his digits spread evenly from 1-9. That’s what we see in Trump’s Chicago graph for numbers 3-9: about 150 in each. But he also got 100-199 votes in 19% of the precincts: that pushes his 1 count much higher than the Benford’s Law prediction. Finally, there were some places he got over 200 votes, which coincidentally pushes his 2 count about in line with Benford. But, really, when you look at the Trump Chicago graph, it isn’t following Benford’s Law, either – it’s basically uniform, with some extra 2’s and a lot of extra 1’s.

          Since Biden usually got 200-600 votes in each district, he isn’t going to get nearly as many 1’s as Benford’s Law would predict, which is what the graph showed. But that’s all really a function of the precinct sizes, and not an indication of fraud at all. If turnout had dropped by half for some reason, Biden’s votes would have been in the 100-300 s and they would have fallen much more like Trump’s.

        3. Dear Rob,
          Thank you again for your explanation. Here is another question.

          Using your data for Chicago, suppose we were to combine the smaller precincts into larger fictitious precincts by adding their total votes. Our goal would be to produce a group of larger precincts that approximate the sizes of the larger precincts in the 700 range.

          How would that affect the resulting Benford’s Law calculations?
          Would this produce a valid Benford comparison of the votes for each candidate?

        4. Dear Dr. Berry,

          Rob’s analysis is a very good demonstration of why Benford’s law does not apply in this situation. To answer your further questions, we can speak more generally about Benford’s law.

          The vote total in each precinct is essentially a sample of the voting preference of a larger population (in this case the city of Chicago). Therefore the precinct votes should follow a normal distribution by the central limit theorem. This is strictly only true if the precincts in Chicago are relatively homogeneous, which isn’t the case, but it will be pretty close.

          Benford’s law is a statement that applies to certain kinds of probability distributions, but not all. Specifically, it is true for probability distributions that are distributed evenly over a logarithmic scale. Equivalently, the probability density function must be proportional to 1/x over several orders of magnitude of x. This is never true for the normal distribution. So generally I would not expect precinct vote totals to follow Benford’s law.

  19. If this result is allowed to stand it means the end of democracy in the US as from now on the ‘s wamp’ will engineer the result they support for ever more. There must be a public review and voting investigation or history will show that the USA has no moral superiority over other nations when it comes to their elections. God bless Trump and God help us if the climate fraudsters enact their ridiculous plans.

  20. I think there is an interesting angle to explore in that the federal entity, USPS, is well, a federal entity.

  21. Hi Ed,

    It’s ALL a Democrat scam – the enviro false scare including the climate and green-energy nonsense, the full-Gulag lockdown for Covid-19, paid-and-planned protests by Antifa and BLM, AND NOW the mail-in ballot election fraud – it’s all false.

    We published that the Climate-and-Green-Energy scare was a false narrative in 2002, and by 2009 I wrote that there was a covert agenda, Now the radical greens are admitting that “Global Warming aka Climate Change and Green Energy” was false propaganda, a smokescreen for their Marxist objectives.

    I called Covid-19 correctly on 21March2020 – NO LOCKDOWN! Covid-19 was a relatively mild flu except for the very elderly and infirm. Covid-19 is less dangerous to the general public than seasonal flu’s of recent decades that nobody remembers – the full-Gulag lockdown was not just a huge over-reaction, it was a scam to steal the election.

    Sweden correctly did not impose the full-Gulag lockdown and had low death rates and has now achieved herd immunity – forget a vaccine, all flu’s die because herd immunity is reached.

    The Covid-19 lockdown was used to enable the huge mail-in vote, where the Dems were able to produce hundreds of thousands of false ballots. All the pieces of the puzzle are now in place.

    The radical green objective is to destroy prosperity and move the USA into a planned economy – with a few rich at the top looking down on the many poor peasants – that now describes most countries, and the USA is next if Biden wins.

    We stand at the abyss. If Biden wins, it will be one man, one vote, once – the end of freedom. Europe and Canada have already fallen far down that “road to Venezuela”. If America falls, there will be nowhere left to run to.

    Best personal regards, Allan MacRae

  22. In 1995, when I was in charged with conducting elections for a statewide (California) labor union I was treated to a visit from a sales representative for the Sequoia Voting Systems company.

    His pitch included a comment indicating that we could alter a close vote, “any which way.”

    I asked him what he meant. He replied that Sequoia machines had a “back door,” which would allow a knowlegeable person to change the outcome of an election.

    He didn’t understand that our union represented members in multiple locations statewide, and due to geography we used the Department of Labor’s approved delegate system to elect our officers. We had 30,000+ members at the time, and it would have been extremely cumbersome to have dozens of polling locations throughout the state.

    Thus, the members would elect delegates in the prior year, and those delegates would vote for statewide candidates, similar to a state voting for an electoral college. That meant our district had a total of just 34 delegates, and that low number negated the need for voting machines. So the Sequoia sales rep left empty handed, but every time I hear about Sequoia I recall his sales pitch.

    Sequoia is one of the biggest companies in the state and national voting machine business — but they aren’t the only company, which means competition. With a wink and a nod, sales reps can dangle the prospect of immense power in front of the officials charged with conducting elections, and others.

    That doesn’t mean they’re corrupt, of course. But the ease with which they could change the outcome of an election provides a powerful sales pitch for anyone selling Sequoia’s voting machines.

    The fact that Sequoia’s machines can be hacked can be confirmed with a simple search, using keywords such as, “voting + Sequoia.”

    This link provides an example of the information available online:


    Draw your own conclusions…

  23. You reference “former” CIA director Gin Haspel as “probably already fired. There are persistent rumors she was wounded during a CIA vs military fire fight in Frankfort, Germany; she possibly dies from injuries. Do you have any information regards these rumors?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.