If the COVID scare were true science, why do we not use Ivermectine?
Mercola.com, August 16, 2021
Ivermectin is a safe antiparasitic, so why is the FDA acting like it’s poison? A mainstream media opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal asks why the FDA is disparaging a safe, effective drug that they approved in 1996. Authors David R. Henderson and Charles L. Hopper cite an FDA warning letter against ivermectin, which states “you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19.”
The article points out that ivermectin is on the World Health Organization’s “List of Essential Medicines” and that the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance — a group of 10 doctors — says ivermectin is “one of the safest, low-cost, and widely available drugs in the history of medicine.”
Ivermectin fights 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of Covid-19. According to a June 2020 study, a single dose of ivermectin reduced the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in cells by 99.8% in 24 hours and 99.98% in 48 hours.
SOURCES:
Wall Street Journal July 28, 2021
Are Effective COVID Medications Like Ivermectin Being Suppressed Because Their Successful Treatments Could Cause Vaccines to Lose Government Funding?
By Joe Hoft
Published August 21, 2021
Source
Not very long after the pandemic lockdowns began last year, we heard of a potential treatment for COVID-19 involving the off-label use of an existing medication called Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ).
A French doctor published two studies which showed amazing results. Soon thereafter President Trump mentioned the drug in a press conference as a potential game changer. Dr. Fauci dismissed the studies as “anecdotal”.
Hospital trials and observational studies soon began but they quickly showed the medication to be ineffective as a prophylaxis or as a treatment. But in every study, there was something wrong. Either the dosage was way too high or too low, it was only given to patients in severe stages impossible to recover or without Zinc, which was imperative. It seemed as if only minutes later, HCQ and anyone who mentioned it were viciously attacked for promoting quacks and snake oil.
Then an observational study was published in prestigious medical journals that claimed HCQ was ineffective and dangerous, causing cardiac-related complications. Ongoing trials and testing were halted immediately, and the FDA issued a warning advising HCQ not be used to treat COVID. Then, for the first time in history, the FDA restricted doctors from prescribing an approved medication for off-label use. The WHO and the rest of the world immediately followed suit literally stopping all research and testing of HCQ overnight.
Months later we learn that same study was completely fabricated and fraudulent after an investigative journalist analyzed the data. The study was retracted, but the damage had already been done.
At the time, it defied logic for someone to sabotage such an effective and promising medication.
Then In December, Senator Ron Johnson (WI) held a hearing on potential treatment options for Covid-19. Dr. Pierre Kory was one of the first to testify and he explained that himself, and some of the country’s top practitioners in their field formed a group at the outset of the pandemic called Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, or FLCCC. Their sole objective was to find existing medications which could be repurposed to treat those with COVID. The doctor said they had discovered exactly that with Ivermectin. An FDA-approved medication introduced in 1981, it has been prescribed to over 3 billion people as an antiparasitic agent. Dr. Kory said the medication is proving to be a “wonder drug”, highly effective both as a prophylaxis and for early treatment of Covid-19.
8 months later we have witnessed the same disturbing pattern as we saw with HCQ. The group of doctors who brought news of the treatment to the public have been attacked, censored, and ridiculed. The video of the United States Senate hearing described above was even removed from YouTube. Studies and trials proving Ivermectin’s effectiveness were suppressed and marginalized. Clinical trials have been sabotaged using the same tactics as were used to affect the HCQ studies, and in one case, the conclusion of a study was rewritten after being submitted for peer review.
Through subterfuge and sabotage, censorship and subversion, reports of Ivermectin’s success have been stymied and contained in the United States.
But those powerful forces didn’t work everywhere.
Remember that it was not long ago when India was facing an overwhelming surge in cases and death. Remdesivir was widely administered and failed miserably.
Faced with an insurmountable humanitarian crisis of apocalyptic proportion, many areas of India were willing to try almost anything to stop the suffering and death. Ivermectin was introduced into the standard treatment protocol against WHO advisements. In those areas the virus was obliterated just as Dr. Kory described. Ivermectin stopped a raging surge of death in its tracks. The results were nothing short of miraculous.
With the successful results of India, the effectiveness of Ivermectin in treating COVID-19 is no longer debatable. Anyone can see that it is every bit of effective as Dr. Kory described during the senate hearing in December of last year. Yet the FDA warns against taking Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. While the WHO advises that Ivermectin only be used to treat COVID-19 within clinical trials, and the NIH recommends that there is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel.
We know Ivermectin works. We know Ivermectin is safe, cheap, approved by the FDA, and available now. The obvious question is:
Why are the FDA, CDC and WHO suppressing Ivermectin?
From the FDA website it may be related to Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)?
An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. Taking into consideration input from the FDA, manufacturers decide whether and when to submit an EUA request to FDA.
The Emergency Use Authorization for the COVID-19 vaccines is contingent upon “…no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”.
If the CDC, FDA or WHO acknowledge the existence of an effective treatment, such as Ivermectin, then the pharmaceutical companies lose their cash-cow vaccines and their immunity from liability. The vaccine would be subject to normal safety requirements with which the vaccines arguably could not meet. Under the EUA, the safety standard of a medication is extremely low. For instance:
“…FDA must determine that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks of the vaccine.”
In other words, the minimum safety threshold is that it only helps more people than those it hurts. The lesser of two evils, and something is better than nothing comes to mind. If there were another more effective treatment option available, those emergency-calibrated standards would no longer apply.
With the quick emergence of variants, waning effectiveness of the vaccine’s protection and the spike in number of hospitalizations, we have no effective therapy for those getting sick. Like before, even after testing positive for COVID-19, the standard treatment outpatient recommendations are nearly the same as last year. Go home, rest, drink lots of fluids and wait for your lips to turn blue before going to the hospital.
An effective therapeutic and prophylactic treatment like Ivermectin is exactly what is desperately needed and needed now.
It is just what the doctor would have ordered if the doctor wasn’t conditioned, pressured and threatened of being ostracized to ignore his medical training and only follow the CDC guidelines.
For more information on clinical trials and studies of Ivermectin, please visit:
WSJ Asks FDA ‘What’s wrong with Ivermectin?’
If we do a really great job on new vaccines and… reproductive health services, (i.e., abortion) we could lower the world population by perhaps 10% or 15%. —Bill Gates
The United Nation’s goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control of human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day. —Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1991
Robert Malone is spreading false claims about the importance of his own work, and about COVID. https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/07/13/is-mrna-vaccine-inventor-robert-malone-being-erased-for-his-claims-about-covid-19/
Doctor Robert Malone’s name is on the original patents for the mRNA technology. So, I find it comical when ignorant people try to smear Dr. Malone with defaming lies, as they try to argue against the messenger…instead of addressing his positions directly.
In this, and many other cases, the “fact-checkers” ARE the propagandists, not the seekers of the Truth.
Those daring to call out all the dire contradictions, the deliberate lies, and the absurdities of the Pandemic narratives and the toxic serums, which are fraudulently trotted out as “vaccines,” are all subjected to such personal smears and attacks, by those currently committing this on-going crime against all of Humanity.
If you are able to counter Dr. Malone’s posits, with rational information, please do so. If you cannot, your position is purely emotional in origin…which means you can be ignored out of hand, like any purely arbitrary claim may be.
The mRNA COVID vaccines are actually vaccines. Really. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-covid-vaccine-idUSKBN2AM0SS
More direct link to explanation that the mRNA COVID vaccines really are vaccines: https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/pfizer-and-moderna-covid-19-vaccines-are-not-vaccines-the-new-myth/
Just so you know….
This is how the CDC defines the term, “VACCINE”–
“A suspension of live (usually attenuated) or inactivated microorganisms (e.g. bacteria or viruses) or fractions thereof administered to induce immunity and prevent infectious diseases and their sequelae. Some vaccines contain highly defined antigens (e.g., the polysaccharide of Haemophilus influenzae type b or the surface antigen of hepatitis B); others have antigens that are complex or incompletely defined (e.g. Bordetella pertussis antigens or live attenuated viruses).”
Here is why no mRNA nucleotide serum is a “VACCINE”….
No mRNA serum, from Moderna, or Pfizer, contain live, attenuated, or inactivated microorganisms, or fractions thereof, of any pathogen, including the SARS COV 2 virus, and do not induce immunity, nor prevent any infectious disease, or their sequelae (a pathological condition resulting from a disease, injury, therapy, or other trauma.)
In fact, the mRNA serums are designed to attack healthy cells, insert synthetic RNA into them, and force them to create completely synthetic spike-proteins, which do NOT resemble the pathogen’s original spike-protein structure, save for their Prion Domains, which must be present to allow Humans to be infected by both the original SARS COV 2 virus, and the synthetic spike, via their ACE2 receptors.
The attacked cells are all killed as a result of the mRNA infecting it, and floods the vaccinated person’s body with TOXIC, synthetic spike-proteins, by the trillions (way in excess to just stimulate a immune system). These dangerous, synthetic, spike-proteins then travel throughout the body and are then found in every organ, tissue, and bodily fluid, while it penetrates the BBB to infest the entire brain.
We also know with certainty the mRNA captured cells can, and do, continue to produce the synthetic spike-proteins for several months (5) after the initial injection…not just two, or three, weeks.
We also know the effects of trillions of these synthetic spike-proteins invading a body, as they will attach themselves to the body’s ACE2 receptors and cause permanent injury and death, both in the short term…and in the long term, including every single symptom known and attributed to COVID19….all by itself…without the original viral pathogen being present.
The mRNA serums are all comprised of engineered medical devices housed in molecular sized packages, which are then used to infect, and kill, only healthy human cells(anywhere in the body) to force the production of an active toxin, which the afflicted inoculated immune system may, or may not, be able to cope with.
Erroneously referring to this intervention as a vaccine exploits the public’s ingrained trust of the vaccination program to solicit knee jerk response and action. It keeps us entrenched in needless debate in place of taking the necessary measures to investigate the impact on our health.
As current reports demonstrate, not only are these mRNA serums extremely dangerous, but they do not sterilize the body of the pathogen, do not prevent infection, do not prevent one from infecting others, do not prevent the onset of COVID19, or dying from it, do not provide “herd-immunity.” But, it will cause the original SARS COV 2 pathogen to mutate away from what small effect any of these, almost meaningless, serums might have had. It seems all the variants of the pathogen are spawned by the inoculated, not the control group, and mostly infect those same inoculated people.
Truly, the “Cure” is WORSE than Disease….
If we only look at the harm caused by just the mRNA serums…all by themselves…with all their disastrous health effects on healthy people…they would have already been banned and they would be considered to be one of the greatest health blunders in the history of Medical Science!
But, as you know….none of this has been about our health at all. In fact, it is exactly the opposite.
It does not matter that WEBSTERS has modified its definition of “Vaccine” to include the experimental mRNA serums. This is only the expected effect of the huge propaganda machine trying to support the Crimes Against Humanity…now underway.
Ision: Here is a link to the CDC’s definition:
“Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.”
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
My definition is the CDC entry, too. Yours is the short, abbreviated, version…as you can see.
I hope you can see your version is way too simple and not as specific as their full, or as formal, definition.
Found here in the CDC Glossary:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/terms/glossary.html
Ision: The spike protein that the body produces in response to the vaccine is not toxic. https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2021/05/04/spike-protein-behavior
The synthetic spike-protein, itself, is a pathogen…and is quite toxic. If you do not think so, you must explain all the thousands, who have directly died from it, and the tens of thousands, who have been injured by it.
Ision: No, spike proteins that are generated by the cells near the injection site in the upper arm do not flood the body. https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/where-mrna-vaccines-and-spike-proteins-go
Never mind. I cannot teach you everything about the mRNA serums…and what is known about them, currently.
Such a statement is entirely proven to be false….
Not only does the serum not stay at the injection site, it is documented to travel to any place within the body, including the brain. And, the spike-proteins are well documented to travel to every organ, and bodily location, plus are to be found in every bodily fluid…AND to be SHED by the body…and are capable of infecting others.
You are simply too far behind the ball….and need to really update your information. This could explain your initial position, too.
Tom,
If the vaccine is long lasting then why are they considering recommending another booster? How long do we have to continue to take these boosters? Wouldn’t natural immunity be a better alternative?
Stephen P Anderson: The vaccines do not need to last infinitely long for them to be useful. Gasoline is not useless just because a single tank does not last forever. Food is not useless just because you need to eat more periodically. Your objection is irrational.
Stephen P Anderson:
1. Reasons why COVID vaccines provide better immunity than infection by the virus: https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2021/06/22/how-immunity-generated-from-covid-19-vaccines-differs-from-an-infection/
2. Infected and recovered people are twice as likely to become reinfected if they are unvaccinated than if they are vaccinated: https://wgntv.com/news/coronavirus/study-unvaccinated-covid-19-survivors-more-than-twice-as-likely-to-get-reinfected/
Tom,
Stop linking propagandist sites. The AAAS promoted eugenics and racial cleansing in the 1920s. Propaganda in the name of science is abuse. If vaccination works then why all the propagandists’ links? If vaccines work, you need no propaganda. This notion that vaccines work better than natural immunity goes against 50 years of viral immunology. Natural immunity is long-lasting and more effective. Stop your propaganda!
Both of those statements are lies, Dayton, and you should be ashamed of yourself for spreading lies.
The article at the link below has brief summaries, and links to, 15 scientific studies to prove you wrong:
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-15-studies-that-indicate-natural-immunity-from-prior-infection-is-more-robust-than-the-covid-vaccines
Ision: No, the COVID vaccines have not caused thousands of deaths. https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/does-vaers-list-deaths-caused-by-covid-19-vaccines
You are joking, right?
I am beginning to suspect you have foolishly taken the jabb…
Oh, well. Live with the results…at least for as long as you can.
If you wish to extend your chances…there are a few methods you may use.
Be sure to have your doctor check you for pulmonary hypertension…and not just your normal blood pressure…even if you are without symptoms.
Ision: No, the vaccines do not cause pulmonary hypertension. https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-experimental-mrna-vaccine-causes-permanent-heart-damage-death-within-3-years-59248
More lies by Dayton:
The most favorable study of VAERS stated
that 90% of vaccine side effects are NOT reported.
99% NOT reported for the least favorable study.
Dead people can’t file a VAERS report,
and doctors rarely do.
There have been 13,068 deaths reported to VAERS
as of August 13, 2021.
Many of those deaths are not likely
to be caused by the vaccine.
A German pathologist who did autopsies
of patients dying after COVID shots in Germany,
claimed he was certain 30% to 40%
WERE caused by the vaccine.
I only know of one US autopsy
(why only one?)
and that one proved spike proteins
induced by the vaccine killed the patient.
Given the typical VAERS under counts\
of actual side effects, including deaths,
and the likelihood that many of those deaths,
if there ever was an autopsy, could not be
directly attributed on the vaccine,
what we have are inaccurate data.
The data are NOT even close
to supporting your conclusion that
“the COVID vaccines have not caused
thousands of deaths.”
Once again you start with a conclusion, and seek a “study”
to allegedly support that conclusion (confirmation bias).
There is no sign of a doing fair analysis and applying
independent thought.
Ision: No, COVID vaccines do not cause people to shed spike protein. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid19vaccine-reproductivepro/fact-check-covid-vaccines-do-not-shed-from-one-person-to-another-and-then-cause-reproductive-problems-idUSL1N2MG256
It is well known these experimental mRNA serums produce many trillions of spike proteins in their recipients, these vaccinated individuals can shed some of these (spike protein) particles to close contacts and causing disease in them. (Meaning the spikes can bind with ACE2 receptors in the contaminated, causing ill effects.)
A document from Pfizer’s own experimental mRNA trials “acknowledges this mechanism” (shedding) as being a potential problem.
As this document states, one can be “exposed to [the] spike-protein intervention due to environmental exposure,” including “by inhalation or skin contact” with someone who has been inoculated with the mRNA serum, or with another who has been exposed in the same way.
And this, as we now understand, is dangerous. As we know “the spike proteins are pathogenic (‘disease causing’) just like the full virus.” Furthermore, these “spike proteins bind more tightly than the fully intact virus” and thus cases of “pericarditis, shingles, pneumonia, blood clots in the extremities and brain, Bell’s Palsy, vaginal bleeding and miscarriages have been reported in persons, who are intimate with persons who have been vaccinated.”
Such shedding also “appears to be causing a wide variety of autoimmune diseases (where the body attacks its own tissue) in some persons.”
In addition, the unvaccinated can be effected by shed spike-proteins due to the fact that these “spike proteins can cross the blood brain barrier, unlike traditional vaccines.”
Remember, all the spike-protein need do…is merely bind with an ACE2 receptor..to result in damage to the infected. Once the spike-protein binds itself to a cell, it not only causes the chemistry of the cell to be disturbed, causing the cell to swell in size, causing blood circulation restrictions…such as in the capillaries…but also, attract platelets to itself, creating micro-clots..and further limiting blood flow to cells downstream ( a normal immune response mechanism). While the shed spikes cannot propagate themselves, like a full virus, or a nano-particle of mRNA from a serum, any shed spikes picked up by another will not be healthy for them. And, all forms of the spike-protein are toxic.
Ision: Apparently you are not reading anything I’m linking, nor anything from actual scientists. But for anybody else, here is a more technical explanation that the vaccines do not cause shedding of spike proteins: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-nonsense/
Ision: That Pfizer document does not say what you claim it does. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaccine-safe-idUSL2N2NX1J6
Dayton
Every link you provides is deceptive or wrong.
This link claims the Covid vaccines are extremely safe.
TRUTH: They are the least safe vaccines in US history, by far.
The reason COMIRNATY must not be used in the US are legal
( it doesn’t matter if COMIRNATY is exactly the same as BNT162B2 )
If the vial says Pfizer BioNtech, it’s under EUA,
and Pfizer is not subject to liability.
There are millions of BNT162B2 doses to get rid of.
If the vial says Comirnaty, It’s FDA approved,
and Pfizer can be sued (you’d have to lose your
case in “vaccine court” first, and then sue Pfizer.
But if you couldn’t win in “vaccine court” it’s
very unlikely that you could beat Pzizer in court)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Vaccine_Injury_Compensation_Program
A possible reason for this charade:
Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines
lose their Emergency Use Authorizations automatically,
according to the law, if there’s an FDA approved
vaccine alternative available.
So Pfizer “Comirnarty” is approved,
but not available in the US.
Ision: No, the COVID vaccines are not “experimental.” https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-vaccines-idUSL1N2M70MW
You are a troll…for propaganda efforts.
If creating the synthetic spike-protein is the goal of the mRNA serums…in order to stimulate an immune response to SARS COV 2…and, therefore, COVID19, I would think that any synthetic spike-proteins shed to another, non-vaccinated, person…would have the favorable effect of “spreading” the positive effects of the mRNA serum. The shed spike-proteins would have the SAME effect of provoking an immune response…and therefore…also result in the un-jabbed….having the same positive effect as the jabbed.
It does not matter if the spike-protein one’s immune system is addressing was created by one’s personal jab…or another’s. Both spike-proteins will be identical in structure…and effect.
No need to flood the body with Trillions of pathogenic spikes…in any case. The fact that the doses we are injecting into small women…and giant men…are the same…and MASSIVE…and that the same huge dose will be injected into all ages…should alarm one…and give evidence to the malicious nature of the entire affair.
Ision: What you think is overruled by actual, real, empirical evidence. Read what I’ve linked to.
Sorry, Ed.
I will stop now.
Let me sum up the Dayton versus Ision “debate”
Dayton is a fool who has no idea what he is talking about
Ision knows what he is talking about.
On the definition of a “vaccine”
The mRNA is an experimental medicine used as a vaccine.
When approved by the FDA, it can be called a “vaccine”
The definition is not very important.
What is important:
— Unprecedented adverse side effects in VAERS
worst in US history by far
(assume no more than 10% reported — could be less)
— Unknown long term adverse side effects
(no animal testing, and only brief human testing
for two months, before emergency release)
— Short term effectiveness per Israeli data
requiring booster shots every 6 to 9 months
A patient could have 8 to 12 shots over three years,
BEFORE long term adverse side effects are known.
People claiming long term adverse side effects
will be mild, after short term adverse side effects
were at unprecedented levels, are doing wishful thinking.
— Moderate effectiveness with COVID variants
In summary, the vaccines are losers,
and should not get FDA approval,
but they will, because the decision
will be based on politics, not science.
I guess the good news is
the two Chinese vaccines
are much worse !
“Full vaccination is imperative to suppress SARS-CoV-2 delta variant mutation frequency.” Yen & Contreras, 2021, preprint, not yet peer reviewed:
https://www.medrxiv.org/con…/10.1101/2021.08.08.21261768v2
Idiom: No, vaccines are not driving the mutations. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/are-vaccines-driving-the-emergence-of-escape-mutant-variants-of-covid-19/
Stupid autocorrect
“Tom Dayton” is only paid to keep the false narrative going. No one can be as stupid and evil as this idiot displays.
“Tom Dayton” wants you dead, and your children dead, and the noble concept of the United
States dead, and actively works to promote propaganda, while playing “The Confusion Game” to harm people, and promote the Tyranny of his Masters.
No one can be as stupid as this guy…without deliberate intent. He must be evil to the core, and worthy of the worst fate, else his intellect is a mire of dire contradictions, and is unable of the recognition of any aspect of the greatest propaganda event in Human History.
Tom,
You keep linking to these suspect sites. AAAS has nothing to do with science. Like IPCC, it is a political entity. Do you have any links to the American Journal of Medicine or New England Journal of Medicine? There is no need to take the vaccine. There are cures for COVID. Why take the vaccine if you can cure it?
“Actual empirical evidence.”
This is leftist propaganda code, talking point. Science isn’t provable, it is only falsifiable. Like Einstein said, “Why do you line up one hundred scientists against me when it only takes one to prove me false?”
https://newsrescue.com/delta-variant-natural-immunity-700-greater-protection-than-shot-data-from-israeli-govt-shows/
I can link too Tom. Stop your stupid hysterical linking and think man.
Stephen P Anderson: Example: If the entire population of 100 people is vaccinated, then even if the vaccine is 95% effective, all 5 people who become infected will be vaccinated people. The statistic that 100% of infected people were vaccinated, does *not* mean the vaccine is 0% effective. The appropriate statistics are the percent of vaccinated who become infected, versus the percent of unvaccinated who become infected. https://m.jpost.com/health-science/anti-vaxxers-hijacking-israels-covid-data-heres-why-they-are-wrong-674444
Tom,
The appropriate statistics are vaccinated versus natural immunity. If you’re old and have comorbidities, get vaccinated. If you’re healthy, don’t get vaccinated and take treatments if you’re infected.
Stephen P Anderson: Exactly those statistics that you say are appropriate, are in these two new reports linked by the CDC. These are far from the only such studies, they are merely the most recent.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e4.htm
and
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e5.htm
Stephen P Anderson: Those new CDC studies, like all the other studies, show dramatic benefits of being vaccinated over being unvaccinated, for all age groups and all health conditions, save for a tiny fraction of people for whom vaccination is contraindicated.
Tom,
Here is a link to Dr. Zelenko’s interview regarding treatment of his patients. He has been consistent throughout this “pandemic” that could have been mostly avoided but not for politics. I know you have the “welovetrump” site but do yourself a favor and read the interview.
https://welovetrump.com/2021/07/10/watch-new-york-doctor-who-created-hydroxychloroquine-hcq-zinc-covid-19-treatment-bashes-u-s-doctors-experimental-jabs/
FDA APPROVAL OF PFIZER MRNA SERUM IS LIMITED ONLY TO “COMIRNATY” BAND.
Please understand.
The FDA approval is NOT for the currently supplied Pfizer serum “vaccines” in distribution, in the five dose vials.
ALL the existing mRNA “vaccines” from Pfizer, which are NOT labeled with the name, “Comirnaty,” are specifically NOT FDA APPROVED, but are still authorized under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).
ONLY the Pfizer mRNA serum vials displaying the Brand Name, “COMIRNATY,” have FDA approval.
Do not be fooled.
Pfizer will completely use up all its stock of non-labeled mRNA serums, before it begins to use its FDA approved “vaccine,” Comirnaty.
Why? Not only to preserve profits, but to continue to allow Pfizer to enjoy their “hold-harmless” protections, under the EUA.
When Pfizer does start injecting the FDA approved serums, which have been properly marked, they shall incur the standard liability for their product harming people.
It is probable that the existing doses of the unapproved, Pfizer mRNA serums, authorized by the EUA, is sufficient to inoculate everyone in the United States, and, also, most of the World.
If so, there would be no need for Pfizer to bother manufacturing NEW DOSES of their drug, which bare the “Comirnaty” brand name label on them, and for them to accept the liability for the product.
Nevertheless, the FDA approval given to “Comirnaty” will be deliberately confused with Pfizer’s existing EUA ONLY stockpile of mRNA injections…which are NOT FDA approved.
People will then be told vaccination is now required, because of the FDA approval, but will be injected with the non-approved, EUA, serums.
Have fun!
Ision: “ The FDA-approved Pfizer-BioNTech product Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and the FDA-authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine under EUA have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. Therefore, providers can use doses distributed under EUA to administer the vaccination series as if the doses were the licensed vaccine. For purposes of administration, doses distributed under the EUA are interchangeable with the licensed doses.”
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna
TOM:
This is exactly what I was informing people about and is perfectly consistent with what I have cautioned about.
However, the ACTUAL, controlling, document for the FDA approval of Comirnaty, and the continued use of the EUA serums is the following document:
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
Both Pfizer serums are authorized to be given to people:
1) Comirnaty is the newly FDA approved serum, which has labeling requirements.
2) Existing stocks of Pfizer mRNA serums permitted under the existing EUA, as they are now labeled.
The Comirnaty brand operates under full FDA approval and permissions, like any normal approved drug.
The existing stocks of Pfizer mRNA serums, operate under permissions provided by an extension of the EUA.
Since the EUA has not been revoked, and all of its protections are still in place, Pfizer shall continue to use its existing stocks of the serum, until they are depleted… using the FDA approval for Comirnaty… to enhance the speed of this depletion.
In effect, the actual drug, which has received full-approval…is only Comirnaty….and this brand is not even available to be used.
So, until it is available… and Pfizer actually decides to provide and use it… people will get the EUA clot-shots…only.
If everyone is vaccinated with the EUA shots…there will not be a need to ever use Comirnaty, nor to alter the protections of the hold-harmless agreements of the EUA… or abandon these for the normal risks incurred from marketing a fully licensed, fully FDA approved drug.
We do not even know if the drug Comirnaty will enjoy ANY of the special protections afforded to other types and kinds of vaccines, outside of the normal liability for their product.
Ision: There is no “both” serums . There is only one serum formulation, one set of laws relevant to it.
Today’s CDC reports showing dramatic benefits of vaccination:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e4.htm
and
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e5.htm
Tom,
So it’s your contention that if I manufacture one batch of widgets under a set of conditions and then manufacture another completely different batch of widgets under the same set of conditions, they are the same?
Stephen P Anderson: There is only one set of conditions for the manufacture of the Pfizer vaccine. It is *the* Pfizer vaccine. Nothing about its formula or manufacture have changed.
Tom,
You don’t know that. You’re taking their word.
Your problem, Mr. Dayton, is an enormous trust
in government officials, and the inability to do
independent thinking.
You seem to be a believer in the “Rule by Experts”,
like nearly all leftists. How many wrong Covid predictions,
wrong Covid advice, censoring and Covid scaremongering
by the “experts” is required before you stop
believing everything they claim?
Respiratory diseases have a strong seasonal trend.
Viruses also mutate, usually into milder, less deadly variants.
As a result of those two facts, the EXPECTED number
of COVID deaths this summer would be much lowe
than last winter ( even with no vaccines).
That has happened.
That trend also happened in Summer 2020.
Are the lower death rates this Summer caused by
the seasonal trend (yes), the less deadly
Delta variant (yes), and the vaccines (yes).
There is no way to determine exactly what the
vaccines have accomplished except, they have
caused over 600,000 reports of adverse short
term side effects reported to VAERS.
And those reported side effects
are likely to be no more than 10%
of all adverse short-term side effects.
The worst virus in history, the 1918 to 1920 flu,
had two large death spikes, just like COVID so far.
Then that 1918-1920 flu mutated into a milder,
less deadly variant, just like Covid has done,
but with no vaccines or medicines.
If Covid deaths do NOT ramp up much
this winter, that could be caused
by the vaccines, but we won’t be sure.
If COVID deaths ramp up a lot this winter,
that would be evidence the vaccines
have not been very effective.
When you listen to government “experts”,
they tend to jump to conclusions, and those
conclusions are almost always that they are
doing a good job.
The truth is often different, and sometimes
unknown until more data are collected.
The effectiveness of the COVID vaccines is unknown.
They are definitely much more effective in the first two weeks.
than they are six months after taking the shots.
The recent rise of Delta variant cases in many nations
with a high percentage of vaccinated citizens is disappointing.
But “cases” are determined by an unreliable
PCR test, so the numbers can be deceptive.
Hospitalizations and deaths are much more
accurate counts.
Don’t jump to the conclusion
that Covid vaccines are a big success.
It’s too soon to know.
But I would suggest the huge number of adverse
shirt term side effects, unknown long terrn side effects,
and the surprisingly fast call for booster shots
… are NOT signs of success.
The delta variant is not milder. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/delta-variant.html
The current Covid variants, whether they are are called Delta, or something else, are less deadly than the Covid that existed in Spring 2020. The COVID variants spread more easily, but kill less often. Mutations that are less deadly are common in the history of viruses, so can not automatically be attributed to vaccines. That is a fact. Once again you merely assume everything stated by the CDC is a fact, and you are wrong.
Tom,
I’ve had COVID twice. The first time I took Quercetin and Zinc twice a day and the COVID lasted for about a week. This time it lasted for about two days. It is milder, at least in my case.
I think it is milder for people who’ve had the vaccine or who have already had COVID. It was milder for me.
Ireland and Israel are reporting that 50% of those hospitalized with COVID are vaccinated.
Stephen P Anderson: Example: If the entire population of 100 people is vaccinated, then even if the vaccine is 95% effective, all 5 people who become infected will be vaccinated people. The statistic that 100% of infected people were vaccinated, does *not* mean the vaccine is 0% effective. The appropriate statistics are the percent of vaccinated who become infected, versus the percent of unvaccinated who become infected. https://m.jpost.com/health-science/anti-vaxxers-hijacking-israels-covid-data-heres-why-they-are-wrong-674444
The UK is reporting:
“From the 1st of February to the 2nd of August, the UK recorded 742 Delta deaths (yes, the dreaded Delta has not taken that much life).
Out of the 742 deaths, 402 were fully vaccinated. 79 had received one shot. Only 253 were unvaccinated.”
https://electioncircus.blogspot.com/2021/08/two-thirds-of-delta-deaths-in-uk-are-in.html
Stephen P Anderson: It’s just basic math. Here is another explanation: https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-644288348135
Stephen P Anderson: An additional factor that must be accounted for in computing the statistics, is the differing proportions of older versus younger people. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-delta-vaccinated-idUSL2N2OD2CJ
Stephen P Anderson: See Figure 1 for *proportions* of infections and hospitalizations broken down by vaccinated versus unvaccinated, in this CDC report: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e5.htm?s_cid=mm7034e5_w#F1_down
Here is a detailed explanation of why the large number of vaccinated people getting infected, does not mean that vaccine efficacy is low: https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/israeli-data-how-can-efficacy-vs-severe-disease-be-strong-when-60-of-hospitalized-are-vaccinated
Tom:
The FDA licensing is only for COMIRNATY, and vials containing it must be labeled as dictated. The vials of existing EUA mRNA serums may be labeled as they originally had been, and such serums are allowed to be used under the guidelines of the original EUA.
“Conditions With Respect to Use of Licensed Product
AA. COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is now licensed for individuals
16 years of age and older. There remains, however, a significant amount of Pfizer-
BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine that was manufactured and labeled in accordance with
this emergency use authorization. This authorization thus remains in place with
respect to that product for the previously-authorized indication and uses (i.e., for use
to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 12 years of age and older with a two-dose
regimen, and to provide a third dose to individuals 12 years of age or older who have
undergone solid organ transplantation, or who are diagnosed with conditions that are
considered to have an equivalent level of immunocompromise).
BB. This authorization also covers the use of the licensed COMIRNATY (COVID-19
Vaccine, mRNA) product when used to provide a two-dose regimen for individuals
aged 12 through 15 years, or to provide a third dose to individuals 12 years of age or
older who have undergone solid organ transplantation or who are diagnosed with
conditions that are considered to have an equivalent level of immunocompromise.
Conditions A through W in this letter apply when COMIRNATY (COVID-19
Vaccine, mRNA) is provided for the uses described in this subsection III.BB, except
that product manufactured and labeled in accordance with the approved BLA is
deemed to satisfy the manufacturing, labeling, and distribution requirements of this
authorization. “
Ision: “ Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine contains a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 formulated in lipid particles. COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is the same formulation as the Pfizer- BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and can be used interchangeably with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.8”
And that footnote 8 says: “ 8 The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”
https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
Tom…
Read carefully;
The formulation is not the issue. The issue is the liability differences between the licensed and approved Comirnaty brand serum…and the existing EUA serum..by Pfizer.
While we cannot know if all the serums being produced by Pfizer are actually the same formula..or not. There are TWO legally different Pfizer serums…with different permissions..and different handling of liability.
Comirnaty brand is not covered by any existing EUA.
In fact, the existence of an FDA approved and licensed treatment for COVID19, given the name “Comirnaty” means that ALL existing EUA drugs for this disease are now invalid. The Pfizer drug EUA has been extended, until this stock is gone.
However, all other EUAs related to COVID19, can be invalidated at any time.
They will not be…as this would mean Pfizer would need to produce ALL of the serum needed by the planet…being the ONLY approved treatment in existence. Plus, they would become liable for the effects of this approved drug, which is something they do not want. There is no liability protection via any of the current government vaccine programs for this new drug..for Pfizer to shield itself with.
The approval is just a propaganda ploy…as, most likely, no one shall ever be injected with any serum from a vial labeled: “Comirnaty.”
Ision: You are incorrect. Here is a more detailed and comprehensive explanation: https://respectfulinsolence.com/2021/08/25/after-fda-approval-of-comirnaty-antivaxxers-claim-its-still-experimental/
Ision: You are wrong. Dorit Reiss has pointed out that the liability situation has not changed at all:
“As far as I can tell the PREP declaration also covers licensed products. In fact, it says so:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/03/17/2020-05484/declaration-under-the-public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-for-medical-countermeasures
“A qualified pandemic or epidemic product means a drug or device, as defined in the FD&C Act or a biological product, as defined in the PHS Act that is (i) manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a pandemic or epidemic or limit the harm such a pandemic or epidemic might otherwise cause; (ii) manufactured, used, designed, developed, modified, licensed, or procured to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat, or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by such a drug, biological product, or device; (iii) or a product or technology intended to enhance the use or effect of such a drug, biological product, or device.”
The liability situation has not changed.”
Notice I added a new section to this post before the comment section. It talks about the known medical cures for Covid-19 that are prohibited by government, like Ivermectine.
If this Covid-19 scare were true science, then Ivermectine would be readily available to doctors and patients. Yet it is not. That is evidence of a fraud, just like the climate fraud. It is all about money and the desire to control the people.
Vaccines are nice but they should never be forced on people. Everyone should have the right to make his or her own decision about vaccinations and masks. Those who feel they want the feeling of protection of masks or vaccinations should be free to make that choice. But it is wrong to force anyone to get “vaccinations” and wear masks.
I don’t wear a mask and I won’t take any Covid-19 vaccine because I believe they will do nothing to protect me from Covid-19 and, in fact, make it more likely that I may catch Covid-19.
We can debate the science, but we must first recognize that all people must have the right to decide for themselves about how to best avoid catching Covid-19.
Until I can freely obtain and get treated with Ivermectin should I wish, this proves the whole Covid pandemic is one big government authoritarian scam.
I agree 100%.
There are very successful vaccines, such as the polio vaccine,
and “leaky” vaccines with enormous adverse side effects,
and unknown long tern side effects, such as the Covid vaccines.
Like night and day.
After following the constant (and always wrong)
“a climate crisis is coming” predictions
since the IPCC was formed in 1988,
I have no faith in any government bureaucrat
“scientists”, on any subject. Especially about Covid,
and especially the blathering of Grouchy Fauci.
Vaccines should be voluntary.
All medical care should be voluntary.
Covid deaths were low in summer 2020, as expected
with a seasonal disease. They were expected to
be much lower this Summer, with the vaccines,
but reality is not as good as expected.
To me it is clear that Google is the propaganda spreader ( besides Tom Dayton ).
When I google shedding, the first link I get says that shedding is false.
When I duckduckgo the same question I get a link to Pfizer that tells there is shedding.
Also FactCheck.org is funded by the same $1.9 billion vaccine lobby group that it is supposedly independently checking. This is a MAJOR FRAUD, and on top of that, this site is a Facebook partner whose articles are used to censor critical voices on the social media platform. They are instrumental in having people canceled on Facebook.
All I can say is, be very careful what you believe what you read on the internet.
Don’t use Facebook
I never have.
Don’t use Twitter.
I never have
Use DuckDuck Go, and
avoid Google whenever possible.
If you use Google once in a while,
skip the first page of results,
and maybe the second page too.
Those are the “propaganda pages”.
If you use online services that censor,
you are part of the problem,
not part of the solution.
You lived a perfectly happy life
before Facebook, Twitter and Google
existed, so you can live a happy life
without them. Maybe a happier life.
Richard, you are absolutely right.
I never been on facebook.
I was on twitter until they don’t liked what I had to say.
That was years ago. I deleted twitter and never looked back.
Google, right don’t believe them.
For the people that think, its not so bad, watch this documentary. It will open your eyes. Both!!
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/bigtech/the-social-dilemma/
I used the Quercetin and Zinc. Quercetin is a zinc ionophore like hydroxychloroquine that you can order from Amazon. I took 600mg twice per day and 45mg of zinc. The Quercetin will not do anything by itself. However, my friend went to Tractor Supply and bought Ivermectin. It knocked his COVID out in about 5 days. He swears by it. I don’t know what dosage he used.
A GUIDE TO HOME-BASED COVID TREATMENT
https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/
The PREP Act certainly and obviously does cover the Pfizer vaccine regardless of whether it is fully approved or only under EUA: https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/covid-19-vaccine-liability-new-information-after-fda-approval/
A new Israeli study on COVID is being misued by some people, to falsely claim that vaccination is not needed.
Falsehood #1 is that ”natural” immunity in uninfected people is better than vaccine-induced immunity in uninfected people. The study actually showed evidence of strength of immunity gotten naturally *by*infection.* The goal is to avoid infection. Therefore this study is irrelevant to the decision of whether *un*infected people should be vaccinated. (The answer to that question remains a resounding ”yes!”)
Falsehood #2 is that this study showed that previously infected people need not get vaccinated. In fact this study showed the opposite—vaccination helps a lot to prevent reinfection in people who were infected. This study does raise the possibility that the second dose of two-dose vaccines might be unnecessary in previously infected people, because infection serves the role of one of the two doses.
The paper is ”Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections,” by Gazit et al. Its preprint (not yet peer reviewed) was posted on Aug. 27, 2021. Here is an accurate lay person description in Science magazine: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/08/having-sars-cov-2-once-confers-much-greater-immunity-vaccine-no-infection-parties
Dayton, you are brainwashed on COVID19,
as a result of severe confirmation bias.
Correcting your comments would be a full time job.
People misinterpret studies all the time — so what?
It is too soon to know if the vaccines are a big success,
a moderate success, or a failure. One possible test
would be the number of COVID deaths this Fall and
Winter, when respiratory diseases are most deadly.
But then … the 1918 – 1920 flu had two large “death spikes”
and then mutated into a milder variant with NO VACCINES.
There have been two large COVID “death spikes” in the US so far.
If there is another large “death spike” later this year,
that probably means the vaccines are losers.
If there is no large death spike, the vaccines may be
the reason, but who knows for sure. Because that
hapened with the 1918 – 1920 flu with NO VACCINES.
The effectiveness of the COVID vaccines is pure speculation.
They appear to be moderately effective, with early data,
because the antibodies they induce are not long term,
and they are far from 95% effective with COVID21 (Delta)
There are too many variables that affect COVID deaths,
to know exactly what the vaccines are accomplishing.
We DO know vaccines ARE causing
an unprecedented number
of adverse short term side effects.
The vaccines are definitely NOT
accomplishing everything
that had been claimed for them.
Variables that effect COVID deaths:
– A strong seasonal trend of COVID deaths
– The most vulnerable people have already died
– Natural immunity from recovering from a COVID infection
— COVID19 is not the same as COVID21 (COVID in 2021)
– Doctors have improved treatments, from experience
– Vitamin D use and ivermectin use
– Some unknown positive effect of vaccines
Not only are natural antibodies more effective,
and longer lasting, for COVID19 than
vaccine induced antibodies, but the two
are not even close, and there are over
15 studies to prove that.
https://electioncircus.blogspot.com/2021/08/15-studies-that-indicate-natural.html
That fact about natural immunity is generally true
for vaccines in the past, so is not news.
The COVID vaccines are SOOOOOOOOO effective …
that Israel is advising booster shots in six months,
and is now recommending ivermectin use !
“The chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, Haruo Ozaki, held a press conference this week announcing that the anti-parasite medicine Ivermectin seems to be effective at stopping COVID-19 and publicly recommending that all doctors in Japan immediately begin using Ivermectin to treat COVID.”
https://electioncircus.blogspot.com/2021/08/japanese-medical-association-chairman.html
Robert Malone retracted his claim that vaccines labeled COMIRNATY have different liability protection than vaccines labeled Pfizer-BioNTech: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/30/false-claim-that-fully-approved-pfizer-vaccine-lacks-liability-protection/
A portion of vaccine sales revenue goes to the “vaccine court” fund
for lawsuits. It used to be 75 cents per vaccine, and payouts
averaged about 72 cents per shot.
Of course those payouts were
for relatively safe vaccines.
Thar standard procedure
for an FDA-approved vaccine
is to use the “vaccine court”, and
if you lose, you can sue Pfizer.
But if you lose in vaccine court,
the chances of beating Pfizer are slim.
It would not surprise me if Pfizer got a special deal
with the goobermint, but I’ve just described the standard
procedure with vaccine lawsuits prior to 2021.
The name of the vaccine is irrelevant,
but whether it is an EUA, or FDA approved,
makes a difference.
Clear explanation, with empirical evidence, that long-term bad side effects of the COVID vaccines are very unlikely: https://thelogicofscience.com/2021/08/30/future-long-term-side-effects-from-covid-vaccines-are-extremely-unlikely
If the long-term negative effects of the serums are as “very unlikely,” as their short-term negative effects, then I definitely would avoid them.
If one knows what is going on…the article will amuse and surprise you with its nativity.
I have yet to meet anyone with any empirical evidence, or direct observations, of any future unknown event, or combination of events, with which they may use to create the “odds” of some future event, or events, from happening. If one uses past direct observations to create the odds of a future event, but observe a completely different event, in which the acting agents are different in “kind,” as well as in effect, I doubt such odds making would be very reliable.
Much of the confusion is related to the conflated use of the term “vaccine” and equating all use of this term. Another is the article’s dated information and assumptions. It is quite startling in the face of current, uncontested, data…and events.
I imagine one has no idea of what ADE is, or how this has shown up in actual studies of the serums…and the existence of PRION DOMAINS on every spike-protein created by the serums…are NOT LIKE the S1/S2 spikes on the actual SARS COV 2 virus…nor, how none of the serum doses are “small”…and similar to actual vaccines…but absolutely MASSIVE….
Oh, and forget that all the serums being injected cannot address the primary way, by which, people become infected with SARS COV 2, which is via inhaling the virus into the lungs and nasal cavity…where they land on body surfaces, which are not addressed by ANY of the antibodies resulting from the mRNA injections, as they cannot come into contact with the actual infection…at all.
The existing immune system of the vaxxed must address the actual infections of the SARS COV 2 virus in their lungs…alone, as the jab does not cause the manufacture of any effective macrophages and lymphocites to address lung surface infections. This is why none of the serums will protect you from becoming infected with the SARS COV 2 virus, but are said only to reduce the severity of COVID19.
Covid19 is not so dangerous one must accept the additional risks of harm and death, from a known, toxic, dangerous, permanent harm inducing, death dealing, and basically useless….serum… whose long-term negative effects are already beginning to be seen in the earliest vaxxed…and shall not be fully realized for a few more years down the line. The Prion Domains have been proven to be RT into the DNA, and the “short duration” of the serums have also been proven NOT TO BE SHORT…nor to be restricted to the injection site… or to be restrained by the BBB.
Baloney
Wishful thinking
The long term adverse effects are unknown.
Believing the worst short term adverse effects in the history of US vaccines
is NOT a leading indicator of worse than average adverse long term
side effects = wishful thinking.
J. D. Powers does an Initial Quality Survey
of recently purchased automobiles.
By your leftist non-logic,
an automobile that does poorly
in that three months in service survey
can still be expected to do well
in the three years in service
Vehicle Dependability Survey.
But that is very rare !
Two doses of mRNA COVID vaccines protect as well against Delta variant as against Alpha. First dose alone does not protect as much, but still does protect. Aug. 12 article, peer reviewed, New England Journal of Medicine:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108891
So, no need for the “third” jab? Great news!
Now all we need do is tell Israel not to bother mandating the 3rd clot-shot for their Nation…and, maybe, the ADE monster will stay away, too….
lol.
Ision: The need for a third dose of vaccine is a separate topic not addressed by that NEJM paper. Please actually read that NEJM paper. Really. Read. It.
The term “third dose” is used to mean something different from “booster dose.” Here is one explanation: https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/third-doses-and-covid-booster-shots
Here is an explanation of what is known as of a week ago, about booster doses: https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-booster
Getting a paper published does not automatically create truth.
You leftists need to learn that.
You are victims of the appeal to authority logical fallacy/
Tom “wrong” Dayton
The vaccine’s effectiveness for “COVID21”
is significantly lower than for COVID19
The vaccine-induced antibodies are short term,
“wearing off”, and needing a booster shot
at least every six months.
Long term adverse side effects remain unknown.
Stop burying your head in the sand !
No one is happy that vaccines are delivering less than promised.
Please try to return to “realityland”
It just cannot be….we need boosters for the boosters for the boosters…
A failed serum…is a failed serum. The continued use of this failed serum is causing great harm to thousands, killing some on the spot, and creating permanent damage to thousands.
This horrible serum should have been removed from use after the first 1,000 or so deaths it caused.
The continued promotion of this terrible injection is criminal….as is the deliberate denial of treatments to patients for their illnesses…as is the propaganda supporting this abuse.
People should hang.
“People who experience breakthrough infections of the coronavirus after being fully vaccinated are about 50 percent less likely to experience long Covid than are unvaccinated people who catch the virus.”
New paper in The Lancet: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00460-6/fulltext
First of all…The LANCET has already been forced to admit to fraud, and then forced to remove, a COVID19 propaganda article from its publication, caught in it efforts to spread false information of malicious intent.
Second… It is simply not possible to know the percentage of people who will experience long-term COVID19 effects, whether they have been vaccinated..or not.
Third……So, 50% will NOT BE LESS LIKELY…and will, in fact, be AS LIKELY, or MORE LIKELY, than the un-vaccinated?
***
I shall predict that 50% of all people on Earth will be less likely to experience long-term COVID19 effects, if they have ever eaten a Dill Pickle…anytime in their lives. Means nothing.
***
If one DOES suffer long-term COVID19, and they were vaccinated, how does one know their long-term illness was not caused by their having injected mRNA serums into themselves..which deliberately create toxic S1 spike-proteins by the trillions, which are themselves fully capable of causing EVERY known symptom of COVID19, including permanent serious damage, and death?
It is a simple matter to tell any vaccinated person, who suffers symptoms of COVID19, which are caused by their injection, they are suffering from a SARS COV 2 infection, and any long-term sickness they are suffering, just means they are NOT part of the lucky 50%, and are told, “How unfortunate for you!”
If the vaccinated person never, ever, suffers from any infection of SARS COV 2, and never gets sick…they will be told they are part of the lucky 50%, and, “Aren’t you glad you were vaccinated?”
50% is just flipping a coin. 50% is a nice, safe, guess…which has absolutely NO RISK in making, as no one will hold anyone liable for making it…and it allows the propaganda to service the desired narrative.
###
However, who do the un-vaccinated persons blame for their not getting infected…and not suffering from COVID19, while NEVER facing the additional risks of sickness, injury, and death, caused by the toxic, mRNA, serums?
Who do the un-vaccinated persons blame for the deliberate withholding of effective and safe treatments for COVID19, which are proven to radically lower the impact of this illness…but, also, to prevent it, which are so safe they are sold over the counter..for a few dollars?
Why is it…those countries using these safe treatments and preventatives…have the lowest COVID19 rates in the world….and the fewest deaths?
Why is it that the highest percentages of the new COVID19 patients are all from those countries with the highest rates of vaccinations with mRNA serums?
Why did Japan just authorize Ivermectin for everyone for use against SARS COV 2 infections and COVID19?
How do we know we are seeing contamination in a batch of mRNA serum, and not a deliberate formulation, one of several different formulations, of an mRNA serum? Exactly how does one know what a serum bottle actually contains… what the coded instructions of the mRNA actually are in a serum bottle… how does one know if one is being injected with an inert saline solution, or a malformed mRNA sequence?
There is absolutely NO REASON to inject oneself with ANY mRNA serum. NO REASON to prevent doctors from treating their patients with proven drugs and therapies, which both treat displayed symptoms and mitigate, or prevent, the disease.
You cannot undo the jab, and there is NO REASON to accept its additional risks…at all.