Cosmology | Video

Over 100 billion galaxies, 13 billion years old

ByDr. Ed December 18, 2013January 23, 2018 January 23, 2018

Post Views: 1,158

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, I am not a “shill” for anybody or anything. You on the other hand …? As for my…” Apr 10, 10:20
DAVID ANDREWS on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Richard I guess being a shill for the coal industry that employed you has made you sensitive. Dave” Apr 10, 06:40
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, I answered your long ( and erroneous) diatribe which you addressed to Ed and me. For the benefit…” Apr 10, 02:25
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, Your long (and erroneous) diatribe addressed to Ed and me yet again ignores all you have been told…” Apr 10, 01:22
David Andrews on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Ed and Richard, So Ed and I are both able to reproduce something like Richard’s Figure 1 with Mauna Loa…” Apr 9, 21:05
Richard S Courtney on PREPRINT #1: Human CO2 has little effect on atmospheric CO2: “Don, Berry’s Figure 5 (above) is about the IPCC’s Bern Model which Berry says is wrong. So, What explains the…” Apr 8, 23:19
Dr. Ed on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Richard, I agree with your comment. David Andrews is having a difficult time moving from basic physics to atmospheric…” Apr 8, 11:10
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Ed, Thanks for your posting of the graph which “supports [my] Figure 1. I do appreciate your effort. However,…” Apr 8, 10:42
Dr. Ed on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Dave, To respond to your continued nagging of Richard over his Figure 1, please see the plot that I…” Apr 8, 10:25
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Ed, I have received an email comment on my last response to David Andrews. I copy it to here…” Apr 8, 03:30
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews: You say to me, “True, data is unimportant in your world. You said it, I didn’t.” I SAID…” Apr 8, 00:30
Don on PREPRINT #1: Human CO2 has little effect on atmospheric CO2: “Figure 5 of the paper suggests that once CO2 reaches 410 ppm, outflows will equal inflows, and balance will be…” Apr 7, 15:33
Dr. Ed on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear David, Your recent comments have departed from science and evolved into baseless attacks on Richard’s paper and even the…” Apr 7, 10:14
David Andrews on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “True, data is unimportant in your world. You said it, I didn’t.” Apr 7, 09:24
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, You say to me, “Perhaps you think I am being pedantic.” No! I think you are being obnoxious,…” Apr 7, 00:37
David Andrews on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Richard, As you know, my focus is on Figure 1 of your paper. I suspect that the reason you have…” Apr 6, 20:03
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, This is a deliberately separate response to your comment because it does not address anything I have written.…” Apr 6, 01:06
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, You say to me “There is absolutely no doubt that a central theme of your paper, the one…” Apr 6, 00:46
DAVID ANDREWS on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Richard and Ed, It is ludicrous to suggest, Richard, that you are barred from elucidating a key part of a…” Apr 5, 10:20
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Ed, You are correct and I am now a Member of the Editorial Board of E&E so I can’t…” Apr 5, 00:13