Tea Bags attack scientist over Chemtrails.

by Dr. Ed Berry

Yesterday, Jim White of Kalispell, Montana, and his friend, Dane Wigington, released a personal attack on my professional credibility.

Clearly, White and Wigington were not pleased with my article “Chemtrail Delusions vs Scientific Method” where I revealed their idiocy about chemtrails.

We climate scientists are used to personal attacks by leftwing wackos. Now, Jim White proves rightwing radical tea party wackos are as irrational as leftwing wackos.

White’s and Wigington’s mockery

White’s and Wigington’s ad hominem attack on me mocks America’s national defense. It mocks my past participation in America’s defense. It mocks true atmospheric science. It mocks your and my search for truth.

What their attack does not do is show my article about chemtrails is incorrect. No. They think their personal attack on me proves my article is wrong. They thereby reveal they are morons.

Wigington’s attack reveals nothing new about me. Everything he uses about me he stole from my website here and here. Wigington simply interjects and intertwines his own delusional beliefs about climate and America’s national defense with his extracts from my bio.

Wigington is not even clear about what parts of his page are his and what parts he stole from me. And, like all yellow-bellied, know-nothing radicals, Wigington is afraid to put his own name on his work. But for White’s email (below), no one would know who wrote this attack on me.

Why Jim White thinks Wigington is a climate expert.

Here is Jim White’s promo of Wigington’s utter nonsense about climate. It includes White’s reason to claim Wigington is a climate expert:

Dane Wigington-

Dane has a background in solar energy. He is a former employee of Bechtel Power Corp. and has a background in renewable energy. His personal residence was feature in a cover article on the world’s largest renewable energy magazine, Home Power.

He owns a large “wildlife preserve” next to Lake Shasta in northern California. Dane put all his focus, efforts and energy on the geoengineering issue when he began to lose very significant amounts of solar uptake due to the ever-increasing “solar obscuration” caused from jet aircraft spraying in the skies above his forest home. He also noted significant decline in forest health was occurring and appeared to be accelerating. Extensive testing and research into the geoengineering issue was commenced and has continued since 2002.

He is the lead researcher for HYPERLINK “http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org” www.geoengineeringwatch.org and has investigated all levels of geo engineering from stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG) to HAARP.

He has appeared numerous films, and radio interviews to educate the public on the extremely dire environmental and health dangers we face on a global level from geoengineering. Dane lives in Shasta County, California.

Wow! America’s Department of Defense should hire Wigington as their climate expert.

Here’s White’s email to his flock (forwarded to me by one of my friends):

From: J_White [mailto:jim@thelibertybrothers.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 6:25 PM
To: Jim
Subject: Thought you might like this Ed Berry Expose’

Good evening,

The link below will probably only be of interest to those of you who reside in Montana.  We told Dane Wigington about Ed Berry, and Dane created a page exposing him.



Jim White, Co-host – The Liberty Brothers Radio Show


 White’s link takes you to this:

Dr. Ed Berry-Purveyor of Weather Weaponry and Consulting Meteorologist for the AMS

Posted on May 3, 2015 by Jim White

Ed Berry spends his golden years perpetuating political division and attacking activists in his blog, but it comes as no surprise considering his extensive background in top secret military programs funded by the profiteers of weather and climate engineering. Making his tagline, “the truth shall make you free”, quite ironic.

White and Wigington claim I am an “accomplice to crimes against humanity.”

Following this post by me, Wigington has removed his article. It used to be here: Full Article. Here’s what the article said:

Berry’s own biography speaks volumes as to the reason he is a willing accomplice to crimes against humanity, for which he has been a part of since the Vietnam War and Operation Popeye.

Frankly, I am proud that Dr. Pierre St. Amand chose me as the only non-DOD employee to participate in Operation Popeye. I am proud the National Science Foundation chose me to lead America’s research in weather modification. I am happy I had the opportunity to help America.

A Republican Wake-up Call

Jim White has done good Republicans a service. He speaks for Montana’s Very Conservative Evangelicals tea party who constitute at most 20 percent of Republicans and 10 percent of voters.

Yet they elected 80 percent of the Republicans in the 2015 Montana House. They thereby almost defeated Montana’s CSKT Water Compact. They blocked Montana’s important SB 416 Infrastructure bill, leaving Montana with no infrastructure budget until 2017.

They do not understand that truth matters in politics, especially in nonpartisan decisions. They don’t understand the Compact and Infrastructure were nonpartisan bills.

They are a cancer in the Republican Party. They are not conservatives.

This should be a wake-up call to real Republicans to get active and defeat the tea bags in our Central Committees and the 2016 elections.

4 thoughts on “Tea Bags attack scientist over Chemtrails.”

  1. Wow, hell hath no furry like a scientist scorned. As for the attack on your 'professionalism', the first 2 words of your response spoke volumes. "Tea Bags"? Really…

    As for personal attacks, what about your scorched earth personal attacks on Bob Fanning's personal life? And more recently what about your attacks on Dr. Chuck Baldwin and Stewart Rhodes?

    As for truth, what untruth did the above-mentioned article put forth? And honestly Ed, how is it any different from your style and accusations?

  2. Dear Diane, Clearly you have no education or experience in logic and debate. You do not understand the difference between an ad hominem attack and a rebuttal to an ad hominem attack.

    You think I should ignore the ad hominem attack by White and Wignington … because I previously wrote articles about Fanning, Baldwin, and Rhodes. You make no sense at all.

    Read my articles about Fanning (now irrelevant), and Baldwin and Rhodes (very relevant). You will see I do not use ad hominem attacks. I write about important political facts and issues.

    For example, I wrote a rebuttal to Chuck Baldwin's irrational attack on Ryan Zinke where Baldwin told his mesmerized followers to vote for Democrat Lewis rather than for Zinke. You call my rebuttal to Baldwin's attack on Zinke an "attack on Baldwin." Get real.

    "Tea Bags" is my new term for those Tea Party folks who would not vote for Rick Hill for Governor, Denny Rehberg for US Senate, and Mitt Romney for US President. They are consistently negative. They see the glass as half empty rather than half full. They opposed the CSKT Compact. Not all Tea Party folks are "Tea Bags."

  3. The debate began with my criticism of "chemtrails." Jim White, Dane Wigington, and Rebel Siren (who finally revealed herself) did not address the debate. Therefore, my criticism of chemtrails stands unchallenged.

    Rebel Siren does not understand the difference between a subject-matter debate and a personal criticism of her opposition.

    Siren does not know the difference between ethical weather modification and unethical geo-engineering. She thinks a war should kill and injure people rather than miring them in mud so they cannot fight and no one dies.

    Project Popeye was not a "crime against humanity" or any violation of ethics. It saved people's lives.

    Siren is an eco-freak. She believes chemtrails are poisoning us. She believes our CO2 emissions will fry the planet. She believes "sustainable" energy will save the planet. As such, she is unethical because her desired attempt to restrict CO2 emissions kills poor people and birds.

    Would Siren, White, and Wigington like to discuss the truth about chemtrails, global warming, and climate change? Or does their interest in the truth begin and end with attacks on messengers?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.