Two new replies to this letter added on January 30, 2020 by Ed Berry The Daily Inter Lake, Kalispell, Montana, published my opinion letter today here. I post it below. The international meeting in Madrid that was supposed to finalize the rules for the Paris agreement on climate change should never have occurred. The idea …
Climate alarmists have abandoned the scientific method Read More »
I was 4 years old when they told me. It scared me. It really scared me. It must have been in the news that day because the adults were talking about it. The sun was going to flame out! I was old enough to understand the sun was very important to my life. “When is …
by Dr. Ed Berry In the late 1960s, I traveled to South Africa. I saw children with their legs bound to purposely turn them into cripples for life, presumably so they would make money from donations. Today, I see children in America and other countries with their minds bound to purposely turn them into mental …
by Dr. Ed Berry, PhD, Physics The Associated Press reports “Democratic governors are being squeezed by the mandate in President Obama’s climate change plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions.” Governor Bullock is in a hot seat. On the one hand, he is supposed to support the Democrat Party’s irrational, partisan claim that human carbon dioxide emissions …
Open Letter to Gov. Bullock on the Clean Power Plan Read More »
by Dr. Ed Berry 97 percent of the people who claim our carbon dioxide emissions cause climate change haven’t a clue as to what they are talking about. They might as well claim the most important medical remedy is to use leaches to suck blood. Yes, they are that far away from physical reality. They also …
University of Montana removes Professor Running’s claim to 2007 Nobel Prize Read More »
Montana Professor Steve Running is not a Nobel Laureate
Ryan Zinke is a better scientist than Professor Steve Running
“I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and …
by Marita Noon A few months ago, in his State of the Union address, President Obama proudly pledged to tackle climate change—despite opposition from Republicans. To date, precious little action to combat climate change has been seen from the White House—which pleases most Republicans and angers the left. Environmental activists are some of Obama’s most …
by Klaus-Eckart Puls and Sebastian Lüning (translated, edited by P Gosselin, No Tricks Zone) Currently this 2012/13 winter in Germany and over large parts of Europe we’ve been finding lots of cold, snow and ice – the fifth winter of this type in a row. Who can still recall the prognoses and claims of some alarmists …
We, the undersigned scientists, maintain that the case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated. Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a decade now. After controlling for population growth and property values, there has been no increase in damages from severe …
115 Scientists: There is no basis for Climate Alarm Read More »
by The Right Climate Stuff Research Team January 23, 2013 There are competing points of view regarding the causes of climate change in our current environment. One group has concluded that human activities in the burning of fossil fuels have increased the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere which has caused a recent acceleration of a …
Apollo Era NASA Retirees say Climate Science not settled Read More »
Published by Financial Post (and also here since I am a signer – Ed) Policy actions that aim to reduce CO2 emissions are unlikely to influence future climate. Policies need to focus on preparation for, and adaptation to, all dangerous climatic events, however caused. Open Letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations H.E. Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary-General, …
Open Letter to UN Secretary-General: No reason to restrict CO2, Climate models are wrong Read More »
Open Letter to the United States Senate You have recently received a letter from the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), purporting to convey a “consensus” of the scientific community that immediate and drastic action is needed to avert a climatic catastrophe. We do not seek to make the scientific arguments here (we …
Regarding the National Policy Statement on Climate Change of the APS Council: As physicists who are familiar with the science issues, and as current and past members of the American Physical Society, we the undersigned urge the Council to revise its current statement* on climate change as follows, so as to more accurately represent the …
HOUSTON, TX – April 10, 2012 Leighton Steward’s lectures to ex-NASA scientists at the Space Center in Houston resulted in this joint letter from 50 former NASA scientists and astronauts. Steward found 90 percent of the scientists disagree with the NASA-GISS global warming position, so he suggested they write a letter to NASA.
by Harrison H. Schmitt, Apollo 17 Moonwalker, AmericasUncommonSense.com The Constitution of the United States of America sets clear limits on the powers of the Federal Government and permits exercise of those powers only in specifically enumerated activities that relate to providing for the “common defence“, promoting the “general Welfare“, and securing “the Blessings of Liberty” …
Major Constitutional Limits on Climate Change Policy Read More »
by Edwin X Berry, PhD I first published this letter on October 27, 2010. It has been republished by many websites and it continues to be relevant, especially in the current American elections. We are partying on the train to Auschwitz Spokane signed on to the United Nations ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) …
Open Letter from scientists, Wall Street Journal [Open Letter #4: Authors of Open Letter #1 reply to Open Letters #2 and #3.] The interest generated by our Wall Street Journal op-ed of Jan. 27, “No Need to Panic about Global Warming,” is gratifying but so extensive that we will limit our response to the letter …
Open Letter #3 from APS President, Wall Street Journal [This letter also responds to Open Letter #1] The Jan. 27 op-ed “No Need to Panic About Global Warming” is inaccurate in its characterization of the Climate Change Statement of the American Physical Society (APS), the nation’s leading organization of physicists with more than 50,000 members.