Climate truth for you who seek truth
Chuck Wiese is the best meteorologist I know. Last year, he retired from flying the big jets for Delta Airlines. – Ed by Chuck Wiese, Meteorologist With the continued and terrible politicization of atmospheric science and climate, I thought I would take a look at the true cause of this historic Pacific Northwest heat…
July 15, 2021: I invite readers to read Jerry Elwood’s comment and my reply of this date. Jerry’s excellent comment shows how science is supposed to work. Think of this as a chess game. Now, it is my turn to reply which may take me a week. Meanwhile, this is a tremendous opportunity for other…
by Tom V. Segalstad (1998) A number of lifetimes and timescales are being used in both scientific and policy context to describe the behavior of heat-absorbing gases in the atmosphere. These concepts are very important for the discussion on whether anthropogenic CO2 will be accumulated in the atmosphere and exert an additional global “Greenhouse Effect”…
by Richard S. Courtney New plot to compare with Figure 1 Compare Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 with the figure below that I (Ed) plotted using IPCC-approved data with monthly resolution with the bonus that the data extend to 2015. The plot shows that Richard Courtney’s Figure 1 is correct. The annual change in the Mauna…
Note: The described excellent calculations by Happer and Wijngaarden are independent from the question of how much nature or humans caused the increase in carbon dioxide. – Ed Slight, beneficial warming from more carbon dioxide! by David Wojick, Ph.D. Precision research by physicists William Happer and Willem van Wijngaarden has determined that the current levels…
The Glacier Country Pachyderm club invited me to speak at its luncheon on Friday, November 20. Their meeting is in the Red Lion Ball Room, 20 North Main Street, Kalispell, Montana. Please arrive about 10 minutes before noon. You will not be surprised that I will talk about climate. You will be surprised at what…
(Edit and send this to your local newspaper. 284 words to climate sanity. – Ed) All climate alarmism is based upon the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) invalid core theory of climate change: human CO2 emissions caused all the increase in atmospheric CO2 above 280 ppm and since 1750. Here’s why IPCC’s…
By Ed Berry, PhD, Atmospheric Physics, CCM IPCC’s invalid theory Get over it. You are not causing global warming. Those who tell you otherwise are lying to you. Here is new, powerful evidence that the climate alarmists are wrong. They flunk science. They have caused the greatest scam in human history. The United Nations IPCC…
Below are the first two sections of the Introduction to my definitive paper on why IPCC’s core hypothesis is invalid. All the math and physics are done, but I am expanding the Introduction because too many people with PhD degrees still get confused. They don’t understand the basics of science because they have little or…
by Dr. Ed Berry Abstract The above-ground atomic bomb tests in the 1950s and 1960s almost doubled the level of 14C, in the form of CO2, in the atmosphere. The D14C data show how the 14CO2 returned to its natural level after the termination of the bomb tests in 1963. A simple physics model accurately…
by Ed Berry, Ph.D., Physics Permission granted to republish with link to this original. Climate Truth New calculations prove all human CO2 emitted since 1750 has added only 31 ppm (parts per million) of CO2 to the atmosphere, and natural CO2 has added 100 ppm. All human carbon has added only one percent to the…
“Trump pulls out of the UN Paris Climate Agreement” vs “More than 11,000 scientists from around the world declare a ‘climate emergency’” In a moment, I will to show you a simple proof that President Trump is a better climate scientist than all 11,000 climate science imposters who claim we have a “climate emergency.” Those…
by Edwin X Berry, Ph.D., Physics October 11, 2019: I posted the first draft of this Preprint for your comments. June 20, 2020: Thanks to all your comments, I have replaced this Preprint #2 with my much updated Preprint #3. I am preserving your comments and closing the discussions on this post.
Berry (2019) plus 55 comments by John Nielsen-Gammon and 55 replies by Ed Berry Good science needs good critique and defense. This report lets you read both sides of the discussion on Berry (2019). read & Join The conversation topics Covered The Science Problem Are the values in IPCC AR5 Fig. 6.1 valid? The Physics…
[Updated 8/26/2020 – Ed] On July 4, 2019, the International Journal of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences published my scientific paper, “Human CO2 Emissions have little Effect on Atmospheric CO2.“ Because it is easy to read even for non-scientists, I encourage you to download the free PDF of my paper here. My paper’s 9000 plus words…
Note: The International Journal of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences published its online version of this paper on July 4, 2019, here. Edwin X Berry, Climate Physics LLC, Bigfork, Montana, USA Abstract The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) agrees human CO2 is only 5 percent and natural CO2 is 95 percent of the…
by Edwin Berry, Ph.D., Physics Human CO2 does not cause climate change. High-school level science shows why human CO2 has an insignificant effect on atmospheric CO2. Therefore nature, not human CO2 emissions, is the true cause of climate change. Climate alarmists predict disasters that never happen. They produce endless lists of bad things they claim…
