Senator Jackson: CSKT Water Compact is flawed

[See my rebuttal to Senator Verdell Jackson’s post here. – Ed]

by Senator Verdell Jackson, Kalispell, Montana

VerdellJackson150The Confederated Salish Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) proposed Water Compact should protect existing uses of water both on and off the reservation. The existing human impact on the 8.4 million acre feet of water flowing down the Flathead River each year is so small that it cannot be measured.

There is not a water shortage. The reservation should be given all the surface water they can justify for additional irrigation, commercial, industrial, and municipal uses. There is ample deep ground water to meet residential needs.

Unfortunately, the proposed Compact does not do this. There are 3 major parts to the CSKT Water Compact: the proposed water use agreement, Unitary Water Management Board, and off reservation treaty water rights.

The proposed water use agreement on the reservation is somewhat complicated with a mixture of Montana state-based water rights and tribal water rights. The Compact transfers all irrigation water rights to the tribal government which issues a water allocation to each irrigator of 1.4 acre foot of water for each acre. In many cases this is much less than is needed. Most irrigators want their private property rights in land and water maintained in the Compact which would be in accord with the practice on other federally-owned irrigation projects in Montana. Also, they want the assurance that they will continue to receive at least the same volume of water as in the past.

It is a violation of Article II of the Montana Constitution and the US Constitution to take the state-based water rights without compensation from Indians and non-Indians and transfer them to the CSKT.

A Unitary Water Management Board to administer all water rights within the boundaries of the Flathead Indian Reservation is in the proposed Compact. There is no reason for the Compact to duplicate what the State of Montana is already doing and turn over the administration of water rights to an unelected board which would likely be controlled by the tribe.

There is the risk water users would be treated differently based on where they live. No other tribal compact negotiated in Montana has had a special administrative board proposed in their Compact. This is an equal protection issue and would violate the 14th Amendment, US Constitution and Article II of the Montana Constitution.

Off-reservation water rights negatively impact growth and development in 11 western Montana counties. No other compact has used a treaty right (right to catch fish off the reservation) to secure water rights to control the flows of rivers.

Water right abstracts that have a time immemorial priority date are in the proposed Compact; and are made out to the Federal Government in trust for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes. These are enforceable minimum flows that enable both the Federal Government and the tribes to make a call (stop irrigators from using water). The target low flows are based on an arbitrary standard for robust streams and rivers, not on survival of fish. In some cases, Fish, Wildlife and Parks also has low flow water rights.

Any of the 3 water right holders can make a call. There is no detail on how this would work, but the CSKT has a time immemorial priority date; so all other water rights are junior to their right, including the State of Montana. Also, surface water rights and irrigation wells in excess of 100 gallons per minute primarily on FlatheadLake and the main stems of the Flathead, North Fork, South Fork, Middle Fork and Swan can be called (shut off) by CSKT.

CSKT is a sovereign nation with its own constitution and laws. As such they would not be accountable to Montana citizens. These time immemorial water rights on our streams and rivers and irrigation water wells target those people who grow our food. The Montana Compact Commission and the Federal Government seeks to violate Montana’s state sovereignty and constitution.

An appropriation of 55 million dollars from Montana for CSKT is in the proposed Compact. Tribal members are US and Montana citizens. Montana has bestowed full constitutional rights and privileges on all citizens. If the money is there for a past injustice or for deferred maintenance on the Flathead Irrigation Project, it is the responsibility of the Federal Government, not Montana.

 

2 thoughts on “Senator Jackson: CSKT Water Compact is flawed”

  1. If we are going to hang on fortunes on both the Montana and US Constitutions (as we should) can someone explain the multitude of violations of the US Constitution that have taken place at the Federal level and while your at it, explain how it is that the appointees from the Montana Governors office was able to sit down with the CSKT and deliberately plan to disregard Montana's Constitution as its outlined in the CSKT proposed water compact? Time to call it like it truly is using words that do not require a dictionary to understand.

  2. Time to get ALL Constitutional Conservatives off the couch, and out there educating folks, and VOTING! It was the Federal Government that took lands from the Indians, it is therefore the FEDERAL Government that owes the 55 Million. Let's pay it up and be done with it. No more monthly 'welfare' checks. No more 'separate nation' BS. My sister in law is Osage, I love her, but she would also tell you they are ALL U S CITIZENS. Let the various 'nations' divide up the land among those living on it and be done with it. We can't let a 'separate nation' of folks that ALSO benefit GREATLY from the 'other nation… the U.S.' control our water resources. Why would we allow a 'separate nation' to cut our water, especially when that 'separate nation' depends on the U.S. That's no different than my water rights. I can't block the river water from going into my neighbors property for their use. This compact MUST be changed or better eliminated.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.