Publications

Airborne Expedition to Yellowstone 1966

ByDr. Ed November 5, 2017April 6, 2021 April 6, 2021

Download Report (20MB)

Airborne Expedition to Yellowstone 1966

by E.X Berry and K.W. Nielsen

Desert Research Institute

Technical Report Series P

Physical Sciences Publications No. 1

Reno, August 1966

Prepared in Cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation

Contract Number 14-06-D-5995

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the talented aid of the other members of the crew: W. Carver, a graduate student in electrical engineering, who built and operated the airborne electronic system; and T. A. Wells, DRI’s all-weather pilot, who capably assured that this team’s story could later be told.

See more photos here:

http://www.kimberry.com/ARCHIVES/edwin_x_berry/DRI/index.html

Post Views: 30

Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, I am not a “shill” for anybody or anything. You on the other hand …? As for my…” Apr 10, 10:20
DAVID ANDREWS on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Richard I guess being a shill for the coal industry that employed you has made you sensitive. Dave” Apr 10, 06:40
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, I answered your long ( and erroneous) diatribe which you addressed to Ed and me. For the benefit…” Apr 10, 02:25
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, Your long (and erroneous) diatribe addressed to Ed and me yet again ignores all you have been told…” Apr 10, 01:22
David Andrews on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Ed and Richard, So Ed and I are both able to reproduce something like Richard’s Figure 1 with Mauna Loa…” Apr 9, 21:05
Richard S Courtney on PREPRINT #1: Human CO2 has little effect on atmospheric CO2: “Don, Berry’s Figure 5 (above) is about the IPCC’s Bern Model which Berry says is wrong. So, What explains the…” Apr 8, 23:19
Dr. Ed on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Richard, I agree with your comment. David Andrews is having a difficult time moving from basic physics to atmospheric…” Apr 8, 11:10
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Ed, Thanks for your posting of the graph which “supports [my] Figure 1. I do appreciate your effort. However,…” Apr 8, 10:42
Dr. Ed on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Dave, To respond to your continued nagging of Richard over his Figure 1, please see the plot that I…” Apr 8, 10:25
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Ed, I have received an email comment on my last response to David Andrews. I copy it to here…” Apr 8, 03:30
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews: You say to me, “True, data is unimportant in your world. You said it, I didn’t.” I SAID…” Apr 8, 00:30
Don on PREPRINT #1: Human CO2 has little effect on atmospheric CO2: “Figure 5 of the paper suggests that once CO2 reaches 410 ppm, outflows will equal inflows, and balance will be…” Apr 7, 15:33
Dr. Ed on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear David, Your recent comments have departed from science and evolved into baseless attacks on Richard’s paper and even the…” Apr 7, 10:14
David Andrews on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “True, data is unimportant in your world. You said it, I didn’t.” Apr 7, 09:24
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, You say to me, “Perhaps you think I am being pedantic.” No! I think you are being obnoxious,…” Apr 7, 00:37
David Andrews on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Richard, As you know, my focus is on Figure 1 of your paper. I suspect that the reason you have…” Apr 6, 20:03
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, This is a deliberately separate response to your comment because it does not address anything I have written.…” Apr 6, 01:06
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “David Andrews, You say to me “There is absolutely no doubt that a central theme of your paper, the one…” Apr 6, 00:46
DAVID ANDREWS on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Richard and Ed, It is ludicrous to suggest, Richard, that you are barred from elucidating a key part of a…” Apr 5, 10:20
Richard S Courtney on Limits to existing quantitative understanding of past, present, and future changes to atmospheric carbon dioxide concentation: “Dear Ed, You are correct and I am now a Member of the Editorial Board of E&E so I can’t…” Apr 5, 00:13