A vote for Flint is a vote against Trump

By Dr. Ed Berry, PhD, Theoretical Physics

Montana is a WEF Path to control America.

As a result of an insider conspiracy, the World Economic Forum’s puppets now control Montana’s Republican leadership in the Congress, Governor’s, and Attorney General’s offices. WEF puppets also hold a minor but significant number of seats among Montana’s Republican legislators.

On June 2, Montana Republicans will vote on who will replace WEF-puppet Congressman Ryan Zinke. (Former Seal Commander Zinke was not always a WEF puppet, but he became one in late 2022.)
Zinke unethically and secretly chose his successor, another WEF puppet, Aaron Flint.
Montana Republicans who value their freedom will vote for Dr. Al Olszewski in this critical election.

Aaron Flint’s endorsers – Governor Gianforte, US Senators Daines and Sheehy, and Congressmen Zinke and Downing – have one thing in common. They all supported AG Knudsen’s deliberate loss of the Held v Montana climate lawsuit (HvM) in June 2023.

The positions taken by Republican elected officials and candidates on Montana’s deliberate loss of HvM may be the strongest evidence of who is and who is not a WEF puppet. By their works we will know them.

Flint’s claim that Trump endorses him is dishonest. That endorsement is by Zinke and Daines, who have Trump’s ear.

Knudsen’s deliberate loss of HvM completed the fracture in Montana’s Republican Party. The World Economic Forum needed Montana to lose HvM so that WEF could continue its plan to control America by 2030.

Daines and Sheehy lied to you when they told you that Knudsen lost because the judge was a “liberal.” The judge properly ruled on the evidence presented in court. Montana lost because Knudsen presented no evidence on the defense’s behalf.

Flint’s endorsers are Republican traitors. Cicero wrote, “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.”

Knudsen stipulated at the start of the HvM trial, on June 12, 2023, that Montana agreed with the plaintiffs’ “consensus” claim that our carbon dioxide emissions caused the plaintiffs’ claimed damages.

Knudsen’s stipulation contradicts the scientific method, which is taught even in law schools. Its relevant principles include (a) consensus does not prove truth, (b) it is impossible to prove an assumption is true, and (c) one proof that an assumption is false is conclusive.

Knudsen did not challenge any of the plaintiff’s witnesses. Knudsen did not identify, as he should have, the three core assumptions that underpin HvM and all climate laws, regulations, taxes, and beliefs. They are:

  1. Human CO2 causes the dominant increase in atmospheric CO2.
  2. The CO2 increase causes global warming.
  3. Global warming causes bad stuff to happen.

Other scientists and I have proved that assumptions (1) and (2) are false. This checkmates the scientific case for human-caused climate change.

In April 2022, Knudsen’s team invited other climate scientists to serve as expert witnesses. One replied by recommending that they hire me instead and cc’d me on his email.

This led to a phone call from Knudsen’s contract attorney, who told me that Montana did not allow her to contract with me or pay me. Montana had secretly censored me to prevent me from helping Montana defeat HvM.

Nevertheless, she gave me the opportunity to review and comment on the lawsuit. HvM is a word-for-word copy of the 2011 climate lawsuit that I defeated in the Montana Supreme Court.

In May 2022, an assistant AG, who had not received the memo that I was censored, liked what I wrote and began signing me up as an expert.

However, at the Pachyderm meeting on June 3, 2022, a person I thought was my friend learned of my participation and became very angry. When I returned to my office, I found that AG Knudsen had cut off all my communications with his office.

Flint’s profession is speaking, so he is good at that. But he is not good at making critical decisions. He has aligned himself with elected officials who, like the Democrats, believe assumptions (1) and(2) are true.

Flint’s endorsers also pose a threat to President Trump’s climate agenda.

Trump’s DOE climate report assumes (1) and (2) are true. But Trump must prove in a pending climate lawsuit that (1) and (2) are false.

Trump’s DOE hired globalist Koonin, Obama’s Undersecretary of Science, to lead the DOE report and other “Fauci” scientists to help write it. To save his climate policies, Trump must reject his DOE report, fire its scientists, and hire scientists who have published proof that these two assumptions are false.

Dr. Al Olszewski is a physician who knows how to make critical decisions, including climate decisions. He bought a copy of my book in 2020, and he supports climate truth.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

My wife and I won national and world championships in US 7485

Subscribe to Dr. Ed Berry's free emails

The Science of the People who want to be FREE ™