edberry.com

this is the tagline

  • All
  • Books
    • The Story of the CSKT Compact
    • Montana’s Last Indian Water Compact
    • My Author Page
  • Climate
    • Climate Law
    • Climate Physics
    • Climate Politics
    • Why Climate Physics
  • Energy
    • Energy Blue
    • Energy Green
    • Energy Red
  • Life
    • Animals
    • Military
    • Music
    • Photos
    • People
    • Politics
    • Sports
  • PolyMontana
    • CSKT Chemtrail Club
    • CSKT Honor Roll
    • President Trump
    • Principles
  • About
    • Contact Dr. Ed
    • Gravatar
    • Aurora Forecast
  • EXB
    • Biosketch
    • CV
    • Detailed CV
    • Interests
    • Publications
    • Research Gate
    • Academia
    • Airborne Expedition to Yellowstone 1966

Today is Al Gore’s Global Warming Doomsday

by Dr. Ed Berry, also NewsWithViews

AlGorePredictionHere we are on January 26, 2016. Do you feel the heat? Do you see the clouds are gone and the sky is glowing red?

Ten years ago, on January 25, 2006, Al Gore stood before his Sundance audience at the screening of his “An Inconvenient Truth.”

Al Gore waved his quivering finger in the air and told his audience that unless the world takes drastic measures to reduce greenhouse gases within the next 10 years, we will reach a point of no return.

GGlobalWarming640ore said our CO2 emissions would cause Earth to go into a runaway heat death.

The Washington Post reported Al Gore “believes humans may have only 10 years left to save the planet from turning into a total frying pan.”

CBS News wrote Gore predicted the earth would be in “a true planetary emergency” within the next ten years unless drastic action is taken to reduce greenhouse gases.

Al Gore’s people have been singing like the Donkey in Schrek, “I believe, I believe.” Ecofreak groups have tried in vain to save the planet from our CO2. Don’t they know it’s too late? It’s over? We’re done for?

Nothing they can do now can save Earth. Al Gore said so. They can relax now and enjoy the heat before we all perish.

Could it be that Al Gore is mistaken? That cannot be.

If Al Gore is wrong then he has betrayed millions of global warmers. They have devoted their lives to Al Gore. Their devotion is their religion. Because global warming is their religion they cannot hear, see, or touch any evidence that might prove their religion is wrong.

But. But. But.

Unless there are no more clouds in the sky and no more snow on the ground, then Al Gore is wrong. You know what Richard Feynman said about the scientific method:

If your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong.

And if you reject the scientific method then you reject true science. Unless you reject your hypothesis that our CO2 causes global warming (or climate change) then your belief is a religion, not science.

You see, Al Gore believed the climate models. But climate models are not reality. Models are but an attempt to simulate reality. We must test models against reality. If the models’ predictions are wrong then the climate models are wrong.

ModelVsDataALook at the red line in the chart. That is the average climate model prediction. According to the average of climate model prediction, Earth’s global temperature has risen 0.7 C since 1980.

No wonder it’s so hot and there is no snow in Washington, D.C.

But wait. That is a model prediction, right? A model prediction is not reality, right?

Have you ever witnessed an incorrect weather prediction? Now you have witnessed an incorrect climate prediction.

The blue circles and green squares show the real data. They show the earth’s global temperature is only 0.2 C higher than in 1980. Al Gore is wrong. The climate models are wrong. The hypothesis that our CO2 causes global warming is wrong. Checkmate.

Isn’t it time the ecofreaks check their climate religion at the door and wake up to reality? If they did, they would save the world a lot of money.

Epilog

Aztecs priests cut out beating hearts, then rolled decapitated heads down the temple stairs to make rain. When rain came, the priests claimed their methods worked. The people believed the priests. So the priests stayed in business.

Today, global warming priests shut down coal-fired electric power plants, tax you to pay for electric cars and wind farms, and sic the EPA on your state to control your businesses and industry.

We think the Aztecs were delusional. But today, as a nation, we are just as delusional as the Aztecs.

Today’s ecofreaks waste time and money trying to “address” climate change when they don’t even understand what causes climate change. Today’s ecofreaks would have supported the Aztec priests in their day.

Today, our schools do not teach students how to think. They don’t teach students how to tell a bad hypothesis from a good hypothesis.

Can you tell me what is wrong with the Aztec hypothesis?

You know the Aztec hypothesis is wrong. But can you tell me the general method you would use to reject the Aztec hypothesis?

If not, then your schools have defrauded you of an education. You are ripe to believe in any wacko idea that comes along.

Just because you agree with me about global warming does not prove you have learned how to think.

Many rightwing folks agree with me about global warming because it is a part of their political “religion.” Well, the ecofreaks believe just the opposite because it’s a part of their religion.

We have many obstacles to overcome in order to learn how to think.

We have Pope Francis who preaches the climate cult religion. He should promote good science like Catholic schools taught when I went to high school.

We have a Montana governor who does not know how to appoint qualified people to a climate board. Our Montana climate board has no climate scientist. This is like a medical board with no medical doctor.

Our Montana climate board has medical doctors who “believe” our carbon dioxide emissions cause wildfire smoke. Is “belief” the qualification for a board? The board has no one to suggest the doctors have not properly diagnosed the cause-effect relationships of our atmosphere.

I don’t practice medicine but some medical doctors practice atmospheric physics. Does our governor not understand the difference between scientific disciplines?

Is there anything more important in life than to be able to tell the difference between a valid cause-effect relationship and a fraudulent one?

Look at some of the reasons ecofreaks “believe” in global warming. They say polar bears are dying, animals are going extinct, the seas are going acidic, the oceans are rising, and, yes, atmospheric CO2 is rising.

But for CO2, these claimed events are incorrect, but suppose they were correct. Would that prove our carbon dioxide emissions caused the events?

What is the fallacy of this reasoning?

The fallacy is consequences do not prove causation. Just because something happens does not prove what causes it to happen. The only way to determine causation is to use the scientific method.

There are three parts to the global warming hypothesis:

  1. Our carbon dioxide emissions cause the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide.
  2. Added atmospheric carbon dioxide increases global temperature.
  3. Therefore, our carbon dioxide emissions cause dangerous global warming.

As we will show, all three parts are wrong.

Our government has spent some $100 billion on climate models. These climate models were supposed to show the above three part hypothesis is correct.

The problem is the climate models have failed. Climate models failed because they do not include accurate atmospheric science. Today’s climate models are the premier example of garbage in, garbage out.

Our atmosphere and its interactions with our biosphere and oceans are vastly more complicated than Al Gore told you. Our atmosphere is as complicated as the human body. No simplistic hypothesis about how either of them work is acceptable.

If we really want to know what drives climate, we must throw out the Al Gore “science” and look to the real science.

Here’s are some highlights in the real science.

As I have previously outlined, there are major problems with the simplistic view that CO2 acts like a blanket that warms what is under it.

Dr. Murry Salby is the author of the 666-page, 2012 textbook “Physics of the Atmosphere and Climate.” He shows that the first part of global warming hypothesis is wrong. Our carbon dioxide emission do not cause the observed increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Salby uses advanced physics and math to analyze CO2 data. He proves mathematically that surface temperature, not human CO2 emissions, causes the change in atmospheric CO2.

Salby’s conclusion does not depend on theory. It results from proper data analysis and mathematics.

Watch Salby’s two presentations. If you do not follow Salby’s lecture then you do not understand atmospheric science.

Dr. Ferenc Miskolczi shows how part two of Al Gore’s global warming hypothesis is wrong. Added atmospheric carbon dioxide does not increase the greenhouse effect or global temperature.

Miskolczi’s peer-reviewed scientific papers show atmospheric water vapor and clouds adjust to changes in CO2 to keep Earth’s greenhouse effect constant. Miskolczi’s predictions match observations. Changes in atmospheric CO2 do not change the greenhouse effect and do not cause global warming.

Dr. Willie Soon is lead author of a 2015 peer-reviewed paper that shows our sun, not CO2, drives climate. He shows how CO2 and total solar irradiance correlate with temperature from 1880 to 2013.

SoonACY

In the figure, the blue temperature lines in each plot are the same. Only the red line is different.

In the first plot, the red line represents CO2. It shows CO2 is not similar to temperature. Therefore, CO2 does not drive temperature.

In the second plot, the red line represents total solar irradiance. The good match shows total solar irradiance is a major driver of earth’s temperature.

Dr. David Evans is an expert mathematician. He found a serious error in climate models. When Evans corrects for this model error alone, climate model temperature predictions decrease by 80 to 90 percent.

Climate models use the old Arrhenius assumption that Earth responds to CO2 change like it responds to change in solar radiation. The Arrhenius assumption is incorrect. Climate responds much differently to changes in CO2 than it does to changes in solar radiation.

Dr. Ivar Giaever won the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physics. He is a Democrat who puts scientific truth above partisanship. He is not an ecofreak.

Giaever explains why Al Gore’s global warming hypothesis is pseudoscience. He says climate alarmists have made their idea a new religion and therefore can’t question it. He shows many conflicts of the alarmist climate idea with the real world of physics.

Conclusions

The choice is yours. You can either accept true science or reject it. If you reject it, you will live in a world of delusion. You will be like the Aztecs who believed their human sacrifices really caused rain.

Of course, you will not believe in the same delusions the Aztecs did. But you will believe in delusions that are just as irrational. You will not know your belief is wrong. If your belief is like a religion, you will refuse to consider evidence your belief is wrong.

So, here’s your homework:

If you had a time machine to transport back to an Aztec community, what argument would you use before an impartial court to show their human sacrifices did not cause the subsequent rain?

 

 

Share2K
Tweet
+1
Shares 2K

January 26, 2016 By Dr. Ed 15 Comments Filed Under: Climate Deception

Comments

  1. Angelo Campanella says

    January 26, 2016 at 9:21 pm

    Silly AGW alarmists.
    See my write-up on AGW being only 0.011 degrees C (0.02F):
    http://campanellaacoustics.com/InfraredAlbedo.pdf

    Reply
  2. Laser Shield Earth says

    January 26, 2016 at 11:06 pm

    f. Dean’s of the International Space University proposal for Earth Shield!!!

    “CREATE a solar shield mechanism that can screen out the most energetic solar storms in the form of coronal mass ejections that could wipe out a significant number of electrical power grids, application satellites and other electronic devices that might be destroyed or incapacitated by coronal mass ejections (CMEs)”.  January 13, 2016 

    Joseph N. Pelton, PhD, is the former Dean of the International Space University, and Executive Board, International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety (IAASS) http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-hazards/space-weather/protecting-earth-and-a-better-way-to-mars/

    Boeing proposed a Laser Plasma Shield* that can REPEL the excessive deadly plasma from space superstorms that may blow up all nukes: http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/images/u33/final_shibata_SWW_2015.pdf
    * http://LaserEarthShield.info

    Reply
  3. MJH says

    January 27, 2016 at 9:54 am

    I did hear Al Gore say that by 2013 the oceans would rise by 6 ft. Why is he so wrong?

    Reply
    • Dr. Ed says

      January 27, 2016 at 6:07 pm

      Dear MJH, Because Al Gore believes in fantasy predictions rather than in real data.

      Reply
  4. sanjay gupta says

    January 27, 2016 at 8:50 pm

    How else would you explain…
    1) The recent floods in chennai that has crossed the 100 year high.
    2) The bilzzerd in NE USA.
    3) The floods in UK.
    4) The smog in Bejing n New Delhi.

    Reply
    • David says

      January 28, 2016 at 12:13 pm

      It’s all as unprecedented and predictable within the context of Earth’s distant, forensically studied history as well as Earth’s recent, observed history.

      Study Earth’s earlier geological history: proceed to the hills of Tennessee where man’s great effort has carved highways through the mountains and rolling hills. There you will see (whether you recognize it or not) the geological history displayed in the many millions of years, testifying to an atmosphere that has often been much richer in carbon dioxide.

      Frankly, the AGW context is really about social science, human behavior; about using fear as an exploitative tool against to masses; about determining winners and losers by way of government force. Same old stupid game humans have played against other humans throughout history (another observable fact that goes ignored among AGW believers).

      Now, run along child. Tell the world you still believe, and you’ll always be the marginalized, exploited little tool the ambitious and greedy want you to be.

      Reply
      • Paul says

        January 29, 2016 at 8:12 pm

        Yes the atmosphere has been much richer? in CO2, but there weren’t any humans there either. Check it out.

        Reply
  5. Collin says

    January 27, 2016 at 10:58 pm

    SANJAY
    easily explained by;
    1) religion
    2) dogma
    3) politics
    4) myopia

    In Invercargill NZ they had 3 floods that passed a 100 year high – yawn!

    Reply
  6. Amber says

    January 28, 2016 at 9:21 pm

    A point of no return is not the same as “this is doomsday”. In the same way “peak oil” doesn’t mean “there’s no oil left”.

    Reply
    • Dr. Ed says

      January 29, 2016 at 6:10 am

      Dear Amber, If you were on a slipperly slope that kept getting steeper and then dropped you off a cliff, at what point would you call it “doomsday”?

      Would it be where you could no longer stop yourself from slipping? Or would it be where you actually fall off the cliff?

      Climate “runaway” or “doomsday” means the point where we could no longer stop the Earth from going into a heat death like Venus. Of course, that cannot happen with the Earth.

      Reply
    • Peter Easton says

      January 29, 2016 at 1:24 pm

      And, Amber, it appears that there is a lot of oil left. I notice that the oil doomsters are now talking about “peak demand”.

      Reply
  7. Fredrik says

    January 29, 2016 at 7:10 am

    Like other natural sciences, climate science must use an inductive method, which involves establishing an hypothesis and verifying (or falsifying) it by experiments. Obviously there is no possiblity to conduct the needed planetary scale experiments, so there is no hope to have any predictive power at all from this science. And no, computer models of climate can’t be used since they themselves must have been shown to correspond to reality in the aspects which they model, which in turn would require the same planetary scale experiments. The question about dangerous human induced climate change remains in the realm of uncertainty and should be subject to democratic processes regarding measures taken.

    The only honest answer about the issue is that we don’t know what will happen in the future. And that Al Gore and others have been wrong is to be expected, if not guaranteed. The same goes for the people arguing that we can expect the same cyclical behaviors from earth in the future and that we somehow are safe from any unexpected life threatening climate change or any other kind of nasty surprise from nature, human induced or not. The issue which plagues the environmentalist’s reasoning is the idea that we somehow can guarantee a safe habitat on earth by human actions. Sustainability etc. means nothing when the next big meteorite or similar natural disaster strikes. We need to keep evolving technology and science towards a “sci-fi” future where we ultimately may be masters of our own destiny as a human race.

    Reply
  8. Dr Tim Ball - Climatologist says

    March 1, 2016 at 12:32 pm

    I would like to tell you of my latest book and documentary.
    ‘The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science’.
    My latest documentary and video of my presentation.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPzpPXuASY8
    My website is
    Thank you.
    Tim

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPzpPXuASY8
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO08Hhjes_0
    http://www.drtimball.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

  • ►Climate Authors (143)
    • Al Tekhasski (1)
    • Alan Caruba (4)
    • Berthold Klein (1)
    • Bryce Johnson (2)
    • Chuck Wiese (2)
    • Daniel Nebert (1)
    • David Evans (2)
    • Don Easterbrook (2)
    • Eric Grimsrud (6)
    • Ferenc Miskolczi (7)
    • Fred Singer (1)
    • Gordon Fulks (2)
    • Harrison Schmitt (9)
    • Henrik Svensmark (1)
    • Howard Hayden (2)
    • Ivar Giaever (3)
    • James Hansen (2)
    • Jay Lehr (1)
    • Jim Hollingsworth (1)
    • Jo-Shing Yang (1)
    • Joe Bast (3)
    • John Christy (2)
    • John Sununu (1)
    • Kyoji Kimoto (7)
    • Larry Bell (1)
    • Leonard Weinstein (2)
    • Miklos Zagoni (6)
    • Murry Salby (4)
    • Myron Ebell (1)
    • Nils-Axel Mörner (1)
    • Paul Taylor (1)
    • Peter MacLachlan (1)
    • Quentin Rhoades (1)
    • Raymond Pierrehumbert (1)
    • Richard Feynman (3)
    • Richard Lindzen (5)
    • Richard Petschauer (3)
    • Roy Spencer (1)
    • Steve Goreham (16)
    • Syun-Ichi Akasofu (1)
    • Tim Ball (10)
    • Tom McClintock (1)
    • Tony Darnell (3)
    • Tony Heller (1)
    • Vaclav Klaus (8)
    • Viv Forbes (1)
    • Walter Williams (1)
    • William Happer (5)
    • Willie Soon (1)
  • ►Climate Law (28)
    • Barhaugh v Montana (20)
    • Cruz Senate Hearing (4)
    • Montana HJ 10 (4)
  • ►Climate Physics (147)
    • AGW Hypothesis (98)
    • Climate Clash (16)
    • CO2-Temp-Sun (5)
    • Cosmology (13)
    • Meteorology (7)
    • Ozone (2)
    • Sea Ice (2)
  • ▼Climate Politics (148)
    • Chemtrail Delusions (2)
    • Climate Deception (98)
    • Comics (6)
    • Drought Politics (6)
    • Open Letters (28)
    • President Trump (2)
    • Steve Running (6)
  • ►Energy (89)
    • Energy Blue (13)
    • Energy Green (43)
    • Energy Red (33)
  • ►Life (67)
    • Animals (6)
    • Military (14)
    • Music (10)
    • People (14)
    • Photos (1)
    • Politics (8)
    • Sports (13)
  • ►PolyMontana (551)
    • 9/11 (16)
    • Agenda 21 (24)
    • Article V (10)
    • Constitution (20)
    • CSKT (73)
    • Defense (13)
    • Democrat (32)
    • Education (12)
    • Elections (9)
    • Eligible (7)
    • EPA-ESA (3)
    • Guns (4)
    • Illegal Immigration (5)
    • Islam (11)
    • Land (14)
    • President Trump (113)
    • Principles (45)
    • Republican (79)
    • Space (12)
    • Tea Party Radicals (49)
  • ►PolyMontana Authors-People (452)
    • Alex Jones (1)
    • Andrew Gavin Marshall (1)
    • Ben Carson (2)
    • Chuck Baldwin (13)
    • Colleen Coyle (1)
    • Dan Cox (6)
    • Dan Happel (4)
    • David Johnson (1)
    • David Ray Griffin (1)
    • Denny Rehberg (22)
    • Derek Skees (2)
    • Dinesh D’Souza (4)
    • F. Swemson (2)
    • Frank Schaeffer (2)
    • Frosty Wooldridge (2)
    • Gary DeMar (2)
    • Gary Marbut (1)
    • George Soros (2)
    • Governor Racicot (1)
    • Greg Gianforte (3)
    • Harrison Schmitt – Politics (50)
    • Hertha Lund (2)
    • Hillary Clinton (11)
    • Idiot (2)
    • James G. Shockley (1)
    • Jay Scott Berry (2)
    • Jerry Molen (5)
    • John F. Kennedy (2)
    • John Grady (7)
    • John Kozy (1)
    • Jon Tester (7)
    • Keith Regier (1)
    • Kelvin Kemm (1)
    • Ken Miller (3)
    • Marco Rubio (2)
    • Marita Noon (52)
    • Mark Dice (1)
    • Mary Kay Barton (1)
    • Matt Rosendale (5)
    • Michael Savage (3)
    • Michael Trigoboff (1)
    • Michel Chossudovsky (1)
    • Mitt Romney (9)
    • Neil Livingstone (11)
    • Obama (42)
    • Pat Buchanan (9)
    • Paul Craig Roberts (4)
    • Paul Driessen (1)
    • Paul Walter (1)
    • Randy Vogel (1)
    • Rebekah Mercer (1)
    • Richard Lamm (2)
    • Rick Hill (12)
    • Robert Rohrer (1)
    • Roger Koopman (9)
    • Ron Arnold (1)
    • Rosa Koire (1)
    • Ryan Zinke (32)
    • Sandy Welch (4)
    • Sorcha Faal (1)
    • Steve Daines (4)
    • Stewart Rhodes (9)
    • Ted Cruz (14)
    • Tim Baldwin (12)
    • Tim Fox (1)
    • Tom DeWeese (16)
    • Trevor Loudon (1)
    • Verdell Jackson (5)
    • Victor Davis Hanson (1)
    • Wayne Allyn Root (13)

Tags

ed-climateed-polyed-sportsvideo musicvideo voice


Recent Comments

  • Dr. Ed on David Appell, PhD, punches Tar Baby: “Thank you for your comment. I have read your paper. Harde (2017) is correct, as is…” Apr 24, 06:57
  • ...and Then There's Physics on David Appell, PhD, punches Tar Baby: “Here's a thought experiment for you to consider. Imagine we have a reservoir with some amount of some element…” Apr 24, 05:10
  • DMA on David Appell, PhD, punches Tar Baby: “Tom I fully agree with your points. In addition to the IPCC making your presumption no. 1…” Apr 15, 09:54
  • tom0mason on David Appell, PhD, punches Tar Baby: “Your paper is excellent and follows logical rational lines. You've fingered the very nub of the problem with the…” Apr 14, 18:03
  • George on Would Einstein be a global warming skeptic if alive today?: “DMA, I agree wholeheartedly.” Mar 30, 09:57
  • DMA on Would Einstein be a global warming skeptic if alive today?: “I sent a link to Happers article to my CO2 consensus accepting friend. He was somewhat appalled by the last…” Mar 26, 17:55
  • DMA on These Researchers have a Political Agenda: “Mr Morner's knowledge of sea level is unsurpassed and it is good to get his views out to the public…” Mar 21, 12:42
  • Dr. Ed on David Appell, PhD, punches Tar Baby: “Dear Bob, Thank you. Here are links for the books you suggest: Fritz Vahrenholt and Sebastian Luning:…” Mar 8, 08:14

 

Recent Posts

  • Would Einstein be a global warming skeptic if alive today?
    2 Comments
  • What the Democrats wanted for President
    No Comments
  • David Appell, PhD, punches Tar Baby
    19 Comments
  • These Researchers have a Political Agenda
    1 Comment
  • A Belief Statement by Rebekah Mercer
    No Comments
  • Can Climate Models Predict Climate Change?
    No Comments

Archives

Click image to read book

In my front yard. The Swan Mountains are behind me. Glacier National Park is to your left.

Edwin X Berry, PhD, Physics
ed@edberry.com

Climate Physics LLC
439 Grand Ave #147
Bigfork, MT 59911

Atmospheric Physicist
AMS Certified Consulting Meteorologist
Expertise: Climate Physics, Meteorology, Numerical Models, Philosophy of Science

Award-winning programmer, pilot with glider, power and instrument ratings, world-class sailor, national caliber athlete, teacher and author.

 

Rowing a Concept 2 Rower

Now for indoor rowing, which I find is the best fitness exercise for busy people (like me) who have no time to hang out in a gym.

I now hold two Concept 2 world records:

Check here to see Concept 2 latest Rankings.

February 16, 2018: I lowered my above World Record for 100 meters from 0:18.5 to 0:18.4.

February 16, 2018: I increased my above World Record for 1 minute from 308 to 309 meters.

For 500 meters (the most challenging race):

  • June 21, 2017: I lowered my PR from 1:46.4 to 1:46.1
  • August 9, 2017: I lowered my PR to 1:45.4
  • November 12, 2017: I lowered my PR to 1:43.8
  • March 21, 2018: I lowered my PR to 1:41.5

I am now only 0.4 seconds behind the lightweight world record set by Dean Smith in 2008, and 0.9 seconds behind the heavyweight world record set by Marinus Boon in 2009.

How do I get faster as I get older?

The common view is people fall apart when they are 80 years old. I am proving you can improve your fitness after you are 80 years old.

I do rowing workouts for about 30 minutes every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday mornings.

My secret is how I workout, my simple diet, and healthy supplements that you can purchase. I take no steroids or other unhealthy drugs.

If you want to learn my secret, go to my (still under construction) rowtribe.com and sign up on my email list. I will send you an email when my rowtribe.com is ready.

Climate Links

  • Climate
    • America’s Uncommon Sense by Harrison Schmitt
    • Carlin Economics and Science
    • Climate Audit
    • Climate Depot
    • Climate Depot Senate Report
    • Climate of Sophistry
    • Climate Quotes
    • Climate Science Coalition
    • Climate Science Coalition of America
    • Climate Sense
    • CO2 Coalition
    • CO2 is Green
    • Cornwall Alliance
    • Dr. David Evans
    • Dr. Roy Spencer
    • Dr. Tim Ball
    • Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy – USA
    • Fusion 4 Freedom
    • Go Nuclear
    • Heartland Institute
    • Issues on Climate Change
    • JoNova
    • Junk Science by Steve Milloy
    • No Tricks Zone
    • Real Climate Science
    • Science and Environmental Policy Project
    • Science Speak Climate
    • The Global Warming Policy Forum
    • The Global Warming Policy Foundation
    • Watts Up With That
    • SPPI
  • Weather
    • Flathead Lake Weather
    • NOAA Climate Data
    • NOAA NCDC
    • Weather Action
    • World Climate Report
  • Flight
    • Flight Radar
    • Flight Radar MT
  • Reports
    • Carlin: EPA Report
    • Chilingar: Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission
    • Gerlich: Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects
    • Hayden: EPA Letter
    • Joanne Nova: Skeptics Handbook 1
    • Joanne Nova: Skeptics Handbook 2
    • Plimer: Human Induced Climate Change – Hot Air
    • Kuhlman: Evaluation of Convective Wind Forecasting Methods During High Wind Events
    • Segalstad: The Distribution of CO2 – Influence on AGW
    • Segalstad: Carbon Cycle Modelling and Residence Time

PolyMontana Links

  • Elections
    • 2010 US Census Display
    • Ballot Pedia
    • Follow the Money
    • Montana Voting Results
    • Politico Voting Results
    • Politics 1
  • Laws
    • Montana Code Annotated
    • Montana Constitution
    • North American Law
    • US Declaration of Independence
    • US Constitution
  • Montana Private
    • Farmers & Ranchers for Montana
    • Flathead Memo by James Conner
    • Intelligent Discontent by Don Pogreba
    • Lund Law
    • Lysander Spooner University
    • Montana BASE
    • Tea Parties
    • Roger Roots bets $5000 on Glaciers
  • Montana Public
    • Attorney Gen Tim Fox
    • Comm of Political Practices
    • MEIC
      • MEIC Mission
      • MEIC Coal Insanity
      • MEIC Energy insanity
      • MEIC Global Warming
      • MEIC MEPA Insanity
    • Legislative Districts
    • Legislature
    • Montana Bill Search
    • Montana Border Crossings
    • Montana Border Crossings
    • Montana Facts
    • Montana Human Rights Network
    • Montana Ports of Entry
  • National
    • 911 Truth
    • Convention of States
    • Dems Against Agen 21
    • Stand Up America
    • US Government Printing Office
  • Platforms
    • Montana Democrat
    • Montana Green
    • Montana Green Sustainability
    • USA Communist
    • USA Green
    • USA Green Beliefs
    • USA Libertarian
    • USA GOP Resolutions
    • USA Republican 2012
    • USA Republican 1868
    • USA Republican 1856
    • Webster 1828 Dictionary
    • Why Third Parties don’t work
  • Politics
    • A Guide to the Political Left
    • Government Track – Bills
    • Three new facts about the Tea Party
    • Republican Factionalism and Tea Party Activists
  • Puzzles
    • Azulejos Trick
  • Search
    • Area Codes
    • Reverse Phone Book
    • ZIP Codes
    • Ham Radio Exam

Copyright © 2018 by Edwin X Berry - Log in