this is the tagline
David Appell says
July 6, 2017 at 9:47 pm
Ivar Giaever is your typical ancient physicist, way out of his league, who anyone knowledgeable can see is just flat-out wrong.
How is it Ed can’t see that?
It’s very sad to see, frankly.
Dr. Ed says
July 8, 2017 at 5:07 am
David, Ivar Giaever understands physics and you do not. He addresses the physics of climate and you cannot find anything wrong with what he says.
But you, a typical climate alarmist moron, attack him personally. You think in attacking him personally, you have debated climate. You are one of the pseudoscientists he talks about.
Frank Hilder says
August 9, 2017 at 10:31 pm
Interesting how defensive you are. Calling people names like “..typical climate alarmist moron” is usually the preferred strategy of propagandists.
And curious how you take issue with David’s comment on the basis that “He addresses the physics of climate and you cannot find anything wrong with what he says….You think in attacking him personally, you have debated climate. Yet Giaever himself attacks Nobel laureate Dr. Steven Chu, making the outrageous suggestion that that “he has been bought” — without providing any evidence.
August 10, 2017 at 5:31 am
Dear Frank, Really! Did you read David’s comment? Did David say anything about the science that Giaever talked about? No.
Given David’s comment, I responded on behalf of Giaever and stand by my comment. David IS “a typical climate alarmist moron.” Have your read the other comments by David on this website?
My comment is not “defensive” as you incorrectly assume. My comment does not need to “provide evidence,” as you also incorrectly assume. David’s comment need’s evidence, and has none.
Follow the information: Giaever provides information. Apple attacks Giaever personally and provides no evidence to defend his position. Apple broke the information chain.
You added one new piece of information to this discussion. You noted that Giaever commented about Chu. But then you said, “without prividing any evidence.” Giaever’s “evidence” is clearly the physics he presents and which Chu denies. There are only two possibilities, from Giaever’s viewpoint: either Chu does not understand physics or “he has been bought.” Take your choice.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *