“My name is Angel Leydig and I wrote this song in support of the Trump Campaign. This song goes out to Donald Trump and all of his supporters. I believe in this campaign, message, and that he truly is the one that can make America great again! Join me in supporting the Trump Train 2016 by viewing, liking, and sharing this song/video to all of our fellow Trump supporters. We Love You Donald Trump and Let’s Make America Great Again!! Let us join together and sing this song all the way to the White House!”
Archives for August 2016
We should throw out all voting machines because criminals can change machine’s vote counts. It would be easy to use laptop computers with simple open-source software to properly count votes and send the counts to three independent servers. All three servers that add the precinct votes should get the same results. – Ed
by Dr. Ed Berry
We all know Democrats and Republicans differ on partisan politics. But there are bipartisan issues where everyone should agree. We should all agree on what facts and science tell us.
Democrats, in general, claim scientists like me “deny climate change.” The truth is these Democrats deny science.
Anyone who has an open mind to scientific truth will understand there is no evidence that our carbon dioxide emissions cause dangerous climate change.
Facts prove our carbon dioxide emissions are not dangerous. If anything, facts show we should try to increase the carbon dioxide in our atmosphere. [Read more…]
by John R. Christy, University of Alabama in Huntsville, February 2, 2016
I am John R. Christy, Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science, Alabama’s State Climatologist and Director of the Earth System Science Center at The University of Alabama in Huntsville. I have served as Lead Author, Contributing Author and Reviewer of United Nations IPCC assessments, have been awarded NASA’s Medal for Exceptional Scientific Achievement, and in 2002 was elected a Fellow of the American Meteorological Society.
It is a privilege for me to offer my analysis of the current situation regarding (1) the temperature datasets used to study climate, (2) our basic understanding of climate change and (3) the effect that regulations, such as the Paris agreement, might have on climate. I have also attached an extract from my Senate Testimony last December in which I address (1) the popular notion that extreme climate events are increasing due to human- induced climate change (they are not), and (2) the unfortunate direction research in this area has taken.
My research area might be best described as building datasets from scratch to advance our understanding of what the climate is doing and why – an activity I began as a teenager over 50 years ago. I have used traditional surface observations as well as measurements from balloons and satellites to document the climate story. Many of our UAH datasets are used to test hypotheses of climate variability and change. [Read more…]
“Now I’m going to discuss how we would look for a new law. In general, we look for a new law by the following process.
“First, we guess it (audience laughter), no, don’t laugh, that’s the truth. Then we compute the consequences of the guess, to see if this law we guess is right, to see what it would imply.
“Then we compare the computation results to nature, or we say compare to experiment or experience, compare it directly with observations to see if it works.
“If it disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. In that simple statement is the key to science.
“It doesn’t make any difference how beautiful your guess is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are, or who made the guess, or what his name is…
“If it disagrees with experiment, it’s WRONG. That’s all there is to it.”
Climate models disagree with experiment, therefore they are wrong. Therefore, the hypothesis that our CO2 emissions cause significant global warming is wrong.